On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 08:28, Adam Samalik wrote:
>
> I noticed we're no longer link to aarch64 isos:
> https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/download
> Not even for Workstation: https://fedoraproject.org/workstation/download
>
> I heard it failed to build. Fair enough.
We do link the Server
ould be) to make the OpenSSL devel package
conditionally define OPENSSL_NO_ENGINE if another package is
not installed. I can think of at least two ways to do that:
- alternatives (but maybe that's my Debian background talking)
- #include_next games
G'luck,
Peter
--
Peter Pentchev r...@r
t_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.
--
h the message "… authenticity of host … can't be established.“
2. Use optional functionality
- SSH CA
—- What do you achieve
—- How to configure
- dnssec
—- What do you achieve
—- How to configure
We could do that by creating a Quick Doc article or by adding a section to the
current Wiki
ll find itself on the orphan
list and up for grabs within the next few days.
Cheers,
Peter
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
htt
Hello!
I'll take care of erlang-hex_core shortly.
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 11:30 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
...
> erlang-hex_core @erlang-maint-sig, peter
...
> Depending on: erlang-hex_core (85)
> erlang-rebar3 (maintained by: @erlang-maint-s
> *nod* would you mind add clean-rpm-gpg-pubkey to Fedora? Then I can simply
> call it.
Here's a package review request for it:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2294337
--
Peter Oliver
--
___
devel mailing list --
On Mon, 24 Jun 2024 at 11:21, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 21. 06. 24 v 18:27 Stephen Smoogen napsal(a):
> > On Fri, 21 Jun 2024 at 07:27, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> So what is the reason to not treat x86_64_v2 as different arch then
> >> x86_64_v{1,3}. Why we keep having this discussion instead of
> Am 24.06.2024 um 17:23 schrieb Arnie T via devel
> :
>
>> I think, you should download from
>>
>> https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/
>>
>> and use FMW with the downloaded image or use balenaEtcher to write to the
>> USB stic
.
>
> Where can you get current F40 + KDE Spin isos?
>
> Arn
I think, you should download from
https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/
and use FMW with the downloaded image or use balenaEtcher to write to the USB
stick
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fed
On Thu, 20 Jun 2024 at 22:03, Jason Montleon wrote:
>
> It may be this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290482
Yep, that's it, an enforcing=0 in the kernel command line works.
> On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 5:00 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > Hi folks,
> &
--now" it comes
up, but I can't do that on devices that have no other access
available.
I'm wondering if this was intended for some reason, I'm not seeing
anything specific that would cause it but I suspect systemd?
Peter
--
___
devel mailing lis
traction, but it eventually did. There was a
i686 SIG which ultimately went nowhere.
To put this a different way, would you be prepared to do the work to
maintain the old v1 packages if maintainers don't want to maintain 2
versions?
Peter
--
___
devel mailin
On Thu, 13 Jun 2024 at 13:58, Chris Adams wrote:
>
> Once upon a time, Ben Cotton said:
> > For myself, I think it's reasonable to conclude there's a non-trivial
> > amount of people using QEMU on that hardware in some fashion. Much of
> > that is probably from podman as opposed to running large
and Runtime
dependency for some other libraries. Re-Review.
* https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2292962 erlang-ct_helper
- Helper modules for common_test suites. Requires for some other
packages to pass the unit-tests. Unstream doesn't provide any tests
yet.
--
With best regards, Peter
t-commander-client gofer
> golang-github-client9-gospell golang-github-elves-elvish gtypist
> jolokia-jvm-agent kanotf-fonts laf-plugin levien-museum-fonts
> libitl logserial mingw-cppunit mingw-freeimage mingw-sword
> neofetch nuntius oc-inject perl-Flickr-Upload php-doctrine-common3
>
> connect to the legacy machines, while maintaining general system
> security.
>
> Anyway, -1 from me.
>
> Rich.
Anyway, -1 from me, too
For exactly that reason.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST
/developer/EPEL/x86_64/index.html
Here the latest available Version is 1.2.23 (2023-01-13) which is about 19
months old.
I want to know if there are plans to update the cacti version in the Oracle
EPEL repo and if yes what is the planned timeline to do so.
Best regards,
Peter Soppe
--
Peter S
On Tue, May 28, 2024 at 09:35:52AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Hello, Peter!
>
> On Tuesday, 28 May 2024 at 08:23, Peter Pentchev wrote:
> [...]
> > If my packager group application is accepted,
>
> Have you gone through the other st
Hi,
My name is Peter Pentchev. I am a software developer who has been
wrangling computers since 1986 and free/libre-software OS's and
distributions since 1997 (Slackware and RedHat (way before RHEL) at
first, then a decade or two of FreeBSD, then a decade or two of Debian).
I have maintained
months as well.
> Yes, this is only relevant for remote-upgrades, but Fedora is a very good
> server distribution and widely spread ;)
Wholehearted Agreement :-)
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)
Fedora
On Tue, 21 May 2024 at 23:51, Sandro wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I intend to unretire pyftpdlib [1] and rename the base package to
> python-pyftpdlib in line with current Python Packaging Guidelines. The
Why unretire? Why not just do a new package given the new name?
> package has been retired for more
On Thu, 16 May 2024 at 13:29, Sérgio Basto wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2024-04-23 at 12:06 +0200, Tomas Hrcka wrote:
> > 1. Suitability for dist-git and src.fedoraproject.org replacement
>
> Can someone explain me what is the problem of pagure ?
There's been a lot of discussions about it. I believe some
ely, not the complete disk). Most importantly you should preserver the
respective partition numbers. And find out what else to adjust (e.g. the
uuids). That will we a lot of work, I guess.
[a]
https://serverfault.com/questions/963178/how-do-i-convert-my-linux-disk-from-mbr-to-gpt-with-uefi
On Sun, 28 Apr 2024, 09:28 Julian Sikorski, wrote:
> Hello,
>
> is there a general recommendation regarding keeping git release branches
> separate vs merged? I have been keeping mine separate. Originally to
> avoid release and changelog conflicts when cherry-picking, but I got
> used to it and
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 12:32, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:49 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:33:51PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 3:26 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed,
manent use and that the
Unison project had been discontinued. This is obviously wrong, fortunately.
Even if the developer group is obviously very small.
I hope you are successful with this project. I would like to make Unison one of
the essential features of Fedora Server.
Peter
--
Pete
t-rust-embed | 2024-04-08 | 3 | decathorpe
> |
> | rust-bytes-cast | 2024-04-10 | 1 | alebastr
> |
> | rust-format-bytes| 2024-04-10 | 1 | alebastr
> |
> | rust-logging_timer
> > > Just for record, the removal of network-scripts was done because
> > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/dhclient_deprecation
> >
> > That page has Category:ChangePageIncomplete.
> > dhcp-client is present in F40, even though it has Provides:deprecated().
> >
> > > Network-scripts
> Am 05.04.2024 um 14:16 schrieb Kevin Kofler via devel
> :
>
> Peter Boy wrote:
>>>
>>> . . .
>>
>> This is an absolute no-go! It would break everyone’s usage of Fedora
>> Workstation
>
> It would be a major change, yes. Though n
u
would know that the numbers for Workstation were declining, whereas the numbers
for Server raised steeply and for CoreOS and IoT steadily up.
To put it in your (Kevin Kofler’s) words (it’s NOT my wording!):
Why should we see any relevance in a declining Workstation instead of all the
steadi
nd safeguarding criteria are a model for success and one of
our differentiation criteria.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora Docs team contributor and board member
r-own-
> adventure, …
And let's not forget that we set special requirements for an edition and an
edition working group behind it, which should (and does) ensure ongoing
maintenance and user orientation in the long term (even if the latter
unfortunately too often takes a back seat).
ounds pretty much like an April Fool's joke (and an abuse of the change
proposal process). A pity in a way, but perhaps better this way, given the
miserable debate about Wayland / X11 recently.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (
over their
tracks: scan a binary for a big power of two sized odd number followed
by a small prime number, and then filtering that with a more rigorous
prime test on the first number will detect RSA keys and probably very
little else. Might be worth grepping for "- BEGIN" as well.
> >>> I don't know how the assumption came up that F40 is only affected if
> >>> users opted in for testing, but that interpretation already ended up
> >>> in the Fedora Magazine and in the official linkedin post of Fedora (I
> >>> already asked to correct it).
> >>
> >> I believe that statement
On Wed, 20 Mar 2024 at 09:05, Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 9:50 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 08, 2024 at 08:37:19PM +, Aoife Moloney wrote:
>> > Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OpensslNoEngine
>> >
>> > This is a
ora?
Peter
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: ht
On Wed, 28 Feb 2024 at 13:38, Barry Scott wrote:
>
>
>
> On 28 Feb 2024, at 10:24, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> You can restore the original behavior by using:
>
># sysctl kernel.dmesg_restrict=0
>
> However, be aware of the security consequences ;-)
>
>
> Given I can get the same information from
On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 20:59, Gursewak Singh wrote:
>
> In Fedora 40, Podman has undergone a major version upgrade to v5 [1],
> introducing some breaking changes. Notably, CNI networking support has been
> discontinued in favor of Netavark, and cgroups v1 support has been deprecated
> in favor
On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 at 12:07, David Abdurachmanov
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 12:49 PM Dan Horák wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 14 Feb 2024 10:42:52 +
> > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:27:53A
properly mirror the builds
with all the appropriate NVR dependencies to properly mirror Fedora
primary builds?
Peter
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedor
> > In a german developer blog article was the topic raised, that with
> > uprobes enabled, userland apps can i.e. circumvent tls security(and
> > other protections),
> > by telling the kernel to probe the function calls with the uprobes api.
> > As this enables i.e. the hosting system of a vm or
(historical and political science) basis.
But this is way off-topic, sorry.
On-topic is how these discussions and decisions affect Fedora distribution as a
whole. And that worries me.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CE
another reason to think about appropriate strategies.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora Docs team contributor and board member
Java developer
On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:33:52AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 10:34:13AM +1000, Peter Hutterer wrote:
> > > And even before that, things were already only limping along. That was
> > > happening for over a decade and in that timefram
aproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam,
On Fri, Feb 02, 2024 at 11:08:15AM +, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 2, 2024 at 10:47 AM Peter Hutterer
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 01, 2024 at 03:40:24PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 15:31 +0100, Leon Fauster via devel wrote:
> >
o
step up and do them. Whether the releases get picked up immediately like in
the olden days is a different matter. But I doubt there'll be an X.org
statement of "we no longer support Xorg" anytime soon, even though that
is, to some extent functionally already true.
Cheers,
Peter
&
> Am 01.02.2024 um 16:47 schrieb Steve Cossette :
>
> On 2024-02-01 10:27 a.m., Peter Boy wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, a bit off-topic here, but nevertheless:
>>
>>> Am 01.02.2024 um 15:14 schrieb Steve Cossette :
>>>
>>
>>
> Will do!
Th
em to me to be in any way as
significant as the decision about KDE and Xorg. And does not represent a
disruption, but rather an evolution.
Would really like to discuss with you about recent 90 degree turns (I’m not
aware of any in the last 2-3 years) and how to avoid it.
--
Peter Boy
h
Hello,
I'll take the widelands package.
Sincerely
Peter
On 1/30/24 11:17, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
I used to do a lot of gaming related Fedora packaging and I still maintain
over 200 pkgs, but I really don't have much time for Fedora package
maintainership anymore.
The last few years
green
> erlang-jose bowlofeggs, erlang-maint-sig, jcline,
> peter
> fwtsbenzea
I worked around the build failure for ftbfs and updated this package,
it doesn't like parallel builds, there's upstream reports bu
Hi,
> Tried twice, same error, aarch64 build bails out with
There's at least one known ICE on aarch64 for gcc-14 so I suggest
checking if it looks related.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2259937
> | 34:29.97 *** WARNING *** there are active plugins, do not report this as a
> bug
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 13:04, Guinevere Larsen wrote:
>
> Hi Fedora list!
>
> I'm trying to upgrade a VM from fedora 39 to rawhide but running dnf
> system-upgrade download --releasever=rawhide fails. the offending
> package seems to be "grubby-8.40-73.fc39", which conflicts with
>
gt; == Summary ==
> > Build the Arm minimal image to be built using osbuild.
> >
> > == Owner ==
> > * Name: [[User:pbrobinson| Peter Robinson]]
> >
> > * Email:
> >
> >
> > == Detailed Description ==
> > The Fedora Arm Minimal image is widely used
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024 at 11:55, Barry Scott wrote:
>
> I have been changing from SSH RSA key to using ed25519 based keys.
> I cannot recall, or track down docs on where to upload my new ssh key to
> for my FAS account.
>
> Can you point me in the right direction please?
Login to
re() [1]:
req->drawable = (CARD32) drawable;
which means that (parts of) the pointer value is sent to the server as
XID and the server should return BadDrawable unless you're really
(un)lucky with your pointer value.
Cheers,
Peter
[1]
https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/xorg/lib/libxrende
On Wed, Jan 3, 2024 at 9:08 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2024 at 15:01, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>
>> Dne 03. 01. 24 v 14:46 Jarek Prokop napsal(a):
>>
>> 4. Why do koji and copr have CPU flag set that differs so much? Is our koji
>> infra OK?
>>
>> For convenience of readers:
nfidence in the reliability and usability of
our Fedora.
We should improve this and make reports of problems clearer.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST (UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora Docs team c
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:15 PM David Abdurachmanov
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 6:26 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:05 PM David Abdurachmanov
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:54 PM Florian Weimer wr
On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:05 PM David Abdurachmanov
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 3:54 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
> >
> > * David Abdurachmanov:
> >
> > > On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 1:09 PM Richard W.M. Jones
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> I'm not sure exactly the effect on RISC-V binaries,
ted tool
availability prone to errors.
I would like to go even further and also separate distribution default code and
locally installed code in the /usr tree. OpenSuse has developed a good proposal
for this some time ago.
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproj
ayed until F-41 so I
don't think we should be using it for this either until it's the
default in Fedora as well.
Peter
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Con
what to do with it next?
>
> Are there _actual_ problems there, i.e., something that doesn't work
> anymore?
Can I take that as „I had a look over the text and found no incorrect or
outdated information about dracut“?
In that case I would want to change the "last review“ date.
(FYI: Thi
be useful, I could that this idea upstream.
There's other pieces that initial-setup takes care of as well, it
gives the option when creating a user to add them as an "admin" AKA
added to the wheel group and I also believe if only a root pas
On Sat, Nov 25, 2023 at 12:21 AM Leslie Satenstein via devel
wrote:
>
>
>
> I am a devout anaconda bigot, and I exclusively use the Everything.iso with
> it.
> Of course, I use it via terminal mode.
>
> A feature I relish in anaconda, is the ability to manage disks and
> partitions.(using the
On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:39 PM Jiri Konecny wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I wonder, I thought that the server images are usually using Anaconda to
> create a user during installation. Am I missing something?
For example there's cases where a vendor ships the OS pre-installed on
the device and they won't
On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 2:31 AM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Hey all-
>
> I’m still having a difficult time trying to figure out what to do about this
> issue I’m having. Swift 5.9 was released awhile ago and I’ve been able to
> build it for x864_64 on all versions of Fedora (Rawhide, 39, 38, 37) just
message:
** (process:2431): Warning **: 13:01:21-525: expected enumeration type void,
bit got PyBlockDevPlugin instead
The Installation works, but showing error messages before the user,
specifically new ones, hadn’t done anything, is a were bad show and is likely
to undermine confidence in our (
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 5:04 PM Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This update failed [1] due to a system timeout [2]
> not a test failure... Is there some way to override
> or wave the failure.
There should be a waive option on the right panel for the update in
bodhi, and you can also retest
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:05 AM Dmitry Belyavskiy wrote:
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:21 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
> >
> > V Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 08:55:12AM +0200, josef radinger via devel napsal(a):
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > openssl1.1 reached EOS on recently (11th September 2023 I assume)
> > >
eral avenues to find out (just grab a
> developer subscription for example).
>
> I just find that this is generally just a mental exercise, but not
> something people do or need to do on a regular basis, and does not
> prevent any use, study, sharing or enjoyment of the code.
>
&g
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:04 AM Alexander Sosedkin
wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 7:47 PM Peter Robinson wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:20 AM Alexander Sosedkin
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > 6 months ago
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 6:24 AM Remi Collet wrote:
>
> Le 26/09/2023 à 19:32, Carlos O'Donell a écrit :
>
> >> In version 8.3 (F40) we'll includes the UTC definition
> >> in our patch to use system tzdata, UTC being use
> >> as the fallback value.
> >
> > I'm curious; what does this patch look
On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 10:20 AM Alexander Sosedkin
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> 6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker: https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2960
> Long story short:
> RPM has moved to sequoia,
> sequoia has started respecting crypto-policies,
> Google repos have been signed with a 1024-bit
On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 6:23 PM Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
>
> On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 7:47 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 19, 2023 at 11:19:18AM +0200, Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > 6 months ago, there's been a F38 blocker:
> > >
On Thu, Sep 21, 2023 at 3:25 PM Ron Olson wrote:
>
> Hey all-
>
> I was trying to submit the released version of Swift 5.9 to Fedora but I get
> a build failure only for the aarch64 platform for Rawhide and F39:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2291751 (F39)
>
not had a response.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2239916
--
Peter Oliver___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https
> Am 14.09.2023 um 14:50 schrieb Fabio Valentini :
>
> Personally, I find the Pagure UI (and GitHub) to be much cleaner and
> easier to navigate than the UX mess that is GitLab …
+++1
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone
ot a python developer, but maybe I can help otherwise (testing,
documentation,…)
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1) / CEST /UTC+2)
Fedora Server Edition Working Group member
Fedora Docs team contributor and board member
Java dev
Hi Kenneth,
> I'm not 100% clear on the process. I have a .spec file that passes fedpkg
> mockbuild.
>
> I submitted the request to
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2238052.
>
> Is that all? What else should I do?
Well the package is already in Fedora with a maintainer [1] so you
On Wed, Sep 6, 2023 at 12:58 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 13:31, Richard Hughes wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 16:27, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>> > It depends on the scanning from ports open to unknown shared files to 'why
>> > did our network costs go up so
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:55 AM Martin Stransky wrote:
>
> On 8/30/23 10:51, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:48 AM Martin Stransky wrote:
> >>
> >> On 8/30/23 10:43, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:42 AM Mari
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:48 AM Martin Stransky wrote:
>
> On 8/30/23 10:43, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:42 AM Marius Schwarz
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> as mozilla released the updates notes for ff 117, the
On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 9:42 AM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> as mozilla released the updates notes for ff 117, there are a lot of
> high impact security fixes for ff 117.
>
> unfortunatly, the ff 117 builds on the farm seem stuck for 40+h ,
> according to koji.
>
> I informed Martin, but
On Mon, Aug 28, 2023 at 9:50 PM Simo Sorce wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2023-08-28 at 15:14 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> > Once upon a time, Richard Hughes said:
> > > On Mon, 28 Aug 2023 at 16:27, Leon Fauster via devel
> > > wrote:
> > > > whats the benefit of this "self-signed TLS certificate" (as it
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 7:35 PM Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> On Fri, 25 Aug 2023 at 19:26, Marcus Müller wrote:
> > I fully agree with that assessment. "Here's a knob you turn that has the
> > potential to make
> > your firmware update 2s faster and is generally good for the ecosystem, but
> >
On Fri, Aug 25, 2023 at 12:43 PM Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I was thinking of adding Passim as a default-installed and
> default-enabled dep of fwupd in the Fedora 40 release. Before I create
> lots of unnecessary drama, is there any early feedback on what's
> described in
On Fri, Aug 18, 2023 at 10:16 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Aug 14 2023 at 07:19:05 PM +0200, Jan Drögehoff
> > >
> > Unfortunately yes. There is more info here:
> >
> > https://www.hadess.net/2023/08/new-responsibilities.html
> >
> > Red Hat has instructed us to stop work on several core
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:41 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> V Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 12:09:34PM +0200, Vít Ondruch napsal(a):
> > Dne 14. 08. 23 v 19:30 Adam Williamson napsal(a):
> > > On Mon, 2023-08-14 at 16:59 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > > > $ sudo dnf update -x dnf
> > > > Updating and loading
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 9:13 AM Luna Jernberg wrote:
>
> I think so as there is Branched composes here atleast:
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/branched/
Builds of packages and composed are completely disconnnected. A
compose will just consume what ever packages are available in a
On Sun, Aug 6, 2023 at 5:35 AM Daniel Alley wrote:
>
> >In my test zlib-ng is about 40% faster.
>
> I did some testing with zlib-ng and createrepo-c a few months ago [0], and I
> also found that the compression portion of the workload was about 40% faster.
> So this matches my experience, too.
On Thu, Aug 3, 2023 at 4:11 PM Artur Frenszek-Iwicki
wrote:
>
> > I just discovered that the fontawesome-fonts package had no commit or
> > build either. I wonder if it has something to do with this error I
> > just encountered while preparing an update for the package:
> >
> > $ git push
> >
On Fri, Jul 28, 2023 at 9:47 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 27. 07. 23 v 22:23 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
> > On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 02:54:13PM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
> >> Samantha Bueno writes:
> >>> We've gone ahead and decided not to replace DNF with DNF05 in Fedora
> >>> 39 and, perhaps
On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 3:37 PM Ralf Corsépius wrote:
>
>
>
> Am 26.07.23 um 15:55 schrieb Solomon Peachy via devel:
> > On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 09:45:13AM +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
> >> It could be "my bubble", but for me, in all these fwupd is around, it has
> >> never, ever worked on any
On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 4:44 PM Florian Weimer wrote:
>
> * Josh Boyer:
>
> > On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 10:53 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >>
> >> On 25. 07. 23 16:42, Florian Weimer wrote:
> >> > * Miro Hrončok:
> >> >
> >> >> glibc32 codonell, fweimer, jakub,
> >>
of
>>> color bash prompt in gnome-terminal]
>>
>> I am overall in favor of this change, thanks for working on this Jens
>> and for keeping it simple!
>
> Me too!
And me too. :-)
And it would be nice to get some color issues fixed in one step, e.g. light
ye
Is there something wrong with the Java-Devel list?
I can send a message to the list and get no reject or error, but is never shows
up, at least it looks like that.
Or did I miss something?
--
Peter Boy
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Pboy
p...@fedoraproject.org
Timezone: CET (UTC+1
On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 10:46 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>
> Dne 20. 07. 23 v 10:08 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> > The dnf5 API has similar primitives (Base, Goal, Package, etc.), but it's
> >> not at all compatible.
>
> It may be worth to add the link to the API:
>
&g
1 - 100 of 3348 matches
Mail list logo
