Thanks Jan,
I had subsequently discovered your COPR, which does work with the DWZ symbols
and allow debugging, however your version is missing Swift support, and so
doesn't support Swift function name demangling and variable display etc.
+1 for moving to -fdebug-types-section anyway.
Regards,
> I can provide an example or two, but I'd rather not waste time compiling a
> list. A good example, any server using iDRAC6,7,8 or 9, such as a PowerEdge
> R440. These are in the interesting edge case that I mentioned, where it
> supports USB boot if you physically connect a USB drive, but you
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, at 1:39 PM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> Please see the examples cited earlier in the thread, of systems that cannot
> be
> installed from USB.
Those are pretty vague references to old workstations and servers rather than
specific make/model. Can you not use a generic rescu
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019, at 1:29 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Chris Murphy wrote:
> > Three years ago I did a more involved search when looking for a new
> > laptop. Zero optical drives in new hardware. Only as external
> > accessory add-ons.
>
> Then you did not search well. The ThinkPad L440 my mother
I have found thermald unreliable on my Thinkpad X1 Yoga G4 (same mainboard as
the X1 Carbon 7) with an i7-8665U. The laptop is unable to cTDP up to 25W and
throttles at 80 degrees rather than 95 degrees as it does in Windows, even
after extracting the ACPI tables with dptfxtract as per the instr
GUI to Python 3, but as mentioned
there are some bugs with their config parser currently.
Regards,
Ryan
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019, at 3:44 PM, stan via devel wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 22:50:32 +0100
> "Ryan Walklin" wrote:
>
> > I built pulseaudio-equalizer directly from gi
I built pulseaudio-equalizer directly from github today and it doesn't seem to
be able to parse it's own config files? Which is a pain because I'd prefer
something lighter than pulseeffects for a simple EQ.
Regards,
Ryan
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019, at 4:10 PM, stan via devel wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2
> > On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 4:22 AM, John Harris
>
> That port numbers are now "technical details" is fairly concerning, and I
> can't imagine why you think users shouldn't be able to configure their
> firewall. You realize we have a GTK firewall configuration program?
>
> Right now, the ave
> That's all it takes: a small green/red switch, saying
> trusted/untrusted, and mapped to the proper firewalld zones. You don't
> need firewall-config, you don't even need to know there's such a thing
> as a "firewall" behind the scenes. You only know that home is trusted,
> other places are untr
