Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

2024-07-19 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 7:37 PM kefu chai wrote: > > > > On Fri, Jul 19, 2024 at 2:22 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >> On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 4:51 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel >> wrote: >> > >> > On 18/07/2024 08:27, Adam Williamson wrot

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

2024-07-18 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 4:51 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 18/07/2024 08:27, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I guess the fmt10 compat package needs to be imported to ELN (or > > everything patched/rebuilt to so.11). > > You're right, a compatibility version is required to unbreak Koji/dnf5

Re: aarch64 iso images - can we link the Everything installer?

2024-07-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 5:41 AM Peter Robinson wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 08:28, Adam Samalik wrote: > > > > I noticed we're no longer link to aarch64 isos: > > https://fedoraproject.org/spins/kde/download > > Not even for Workstation: https://fedoraproject.org/workstation/download > > >

Re: The future Fedora Copr "rolling" chroot cleanup policy

2024-07-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 3:44 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On pondělí 15. července 2024 16:32:45, SELČ Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:21 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > > > > Dne 15. 07. 24 v 2:57 odp. Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > &g

Re: the sad state of installability tests

2024-07-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 4:06 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:55:03AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > This seems like overkill. Wouldn't the simplest valid installability > > test just be to test whether each subpackage *individually* coul

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

2024-07-16 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Tue, 16 Jul 2024 at 07:30, Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Tue, Jul 16, 2024 at 05:24:55AM -0400, Stephen Smoogen napsal(a): > > So you are running into modularity issue there and I am guessing it is from > > mock versus koji because koji gets around modularity with a hack. In

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

2024-07-16 Thread Stephen Smoogen
So you are running into modularity issue there and I am guessing it is from mock versus koji because koji gets around modularity with a hack. In mock you have to tell it to enable the module there are in. I don’t know the syntax off hand but it is probably a command line flag. Stephen Smoogen

Re: Epel8 build with python > 3.6?

2024-07-15 Thread Stephen Smoogen
f-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat A

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Enable Drm Panic (system-wide)

2024-07-15 Thread Stephen Smoogen
to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@l

Re: The future Fedora Copr "rolling" chroot cleanup policy

2024-07-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:21 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 15. 07. 24 v 2:57 odp. Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > > Instead of always keeping "Rawhide" around as a separate buildroot, > why not just rename it at Branching and then create a NEW Rawhide > chroo

Re: Fedora 41 Mass Rebuild Notification - Scheduled for 2024-07-17

2024-07-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 9:43 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > Dne 15. 07. 24 v 3:38 odp. samyak.j...@gmail.com napsal(a): > > The content of this message was lost. It was probably cross-posted to > > multiple lists and previously handled on another list. > > This is not first time I see this. First I

Re: The future Fedora Copr "rolling" chroot cleanup policy

2024-07-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 4:25 AM Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > Hello maintainers. > > This is a gentle heads-up (at least a year in advance) that we plan to > address Fedora Copr storage consumption related to Fedora Rawhide > builds. Currently, Rawhide build results are kept indefinitely, but > this

Re: the sad state of installability tests

2024-07-15 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 8:03 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 01:26:09PM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 08:45:53AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > napsal(a): > > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 10:31:06AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > > > I

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-09)

2024-07-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 3:18 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 09:11:49AM GMT, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > Well, one thing that we ALSO lost in the conversion to Matrix was that > > the minutes used to include links to the full text (in both t

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-07-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 3:24 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:01 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2024-07-12 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-m

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-09)

2024-07-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, Jul 12, 2024 at 7:38 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 01:46:04PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > I'm saying the thing they > > are doing today is not really valuable for a consumer base that wasn't > > in the meeting. If they want to make it better, AI is a

Re: whatcanidoforfedora.org is stale

2024-07-12 Thread Stephen Smoogen
/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Le

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-07-11 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 8:01 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-07-12 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: Converting away from ODCS for ELN composes. --

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-09)

2024-07-11 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 13:47, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 12:08 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 11:34, Josh Boyer wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 12:46 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > > > wrote: >

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-09)

2024-07-11 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Thu, 11 Jul 2024 at 11:34, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 12:46 PM Daniel P. Berrangé > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 09:36:35AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > I'm guessing Josh's response was an attempt to use AI to generate

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2024-07-09)

2024-07-10 Thread Stephen Gallagher
I'm guessing Josh's response was an attempt to use AI to generate a summary. In the future, please label it as such, so people will read it with a critical eye. It has some flaws which I will address inline: On Wed, Jul 10, 2024 at 6:56 AM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 3:14 PM

Re: discuss f41 schedule adjustment for branching

2024-07-09 Thread Stephen Smoogen
ist_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of

Re: PR for rebuild and autochangelog

2024-07-09 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 11:29 AM David Bold wrote: > > Sandro wrote: > > On 09-07-2024 17:01, David Bold wrote: > > > Is it possible to have a PR without any code changes? > > > Is there an alternative, recommended way to ask for rebuilds? > > Specifically in the case of %autorelease, you can bump

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Opt-In Metrics for Fedora Workstation (system-wide)

2024-07-02 Thread Stephen Smoogen
t/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren -- __

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Opt-In Metrics for Fedora Workstation (system-wide)

2024-07-02 Thread Stephen Smoogen
project.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren -- ___ devel mailing

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-06-28 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:17 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-06-28 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > Due to a lack of agenda topics, today's meeting is CANCELED --

Re: Strange error building on Rawhide

2024-06-27 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Thu, 27 Jun 2024 at 01:28, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On 6/26/24 20:03, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Jun 2024 at 10:32, Ron Olson wrote: > >> > >> Hey all- > >> > >> I’m trying to build Swift 6 on Rawhide and it looks like it get

Re: Strange error building on Rawhide

2024-06-26 Thread Stephen Smoogen
Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Re: [SPDX] Mass license change GPLv2 to GPL-2.0-only

2024-06-26 Thread Stephen Smoogen
e growing number of Fedora Containers and Fedora Cloud users. Various organizations ranging from Universities to small businesses will be needing to add various 'auditing' tools for Software Bills of Materials in the coming years for various regulatory reasons. Most of this tooling is less than 'robust'

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

2024-06-25 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 10:32 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 25/06/2024 15:06, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > I am not a lawyer, but I would assume that if Fedora offered to > > provide such a token, it would be reviewed by Legal and provide some > > form of l

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

2024-06-25 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Jun 25, 2024 at 4:48 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 24/06/2024 23:38, Gary Buhrmaster wrote: > > As I recall from a previous query, there are > > (around) 90 active proven packagers (and > > ~250 total who were in the PP group). > > I think most privacy/security focused

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

2024-06-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 1:30 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 24. 06. 24 19:13, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > tickets are valid for 24hours and can be renewed for 1 week. (Either via > > gnome online accounts or just 'kinit -R') > > How do I do that? > > $ fkinit > ... all good ... > > later: > > $ klist >

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

2024-06-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 1:30 PM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 05:11:07PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > > > Messaggio originale > > 24/06/24 18:21, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > > > > > > > > I personally don't see why entering a otp once a week

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

2024-06-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 1:11 PM Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > > Messaggio originale > 24/06/24 18:21, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > > > > > I personally don't see why entering a otp once a week is such a > > burden... but it does seem to be. ;( > > > > Once a week? When I get

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

2024-06-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 12:54 PM Leigh Scott wrote: > > > > I personally don't see why entering a otp once a week is such a > > burden... but it does seem to be. ;( > > > > kevin > > It isn't just once. > > 1. kerberos > 2. Web login on infra, bugzilla, bodhi, devel list and accounts Not really

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

2024-06-24 Thread Stephen Smoogen
an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/dev

Re: [Node.js] Stepping down as Node.js Maintainer in Fedora

2024-06-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 10:40 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 4:07 AM Jan Staněk wrote: > > > > Hi Stephen! > > > > Stephen Gallagher writes: > > > Just a reminder that I will be orphaning the nodejsXX packages in a > >

Re: [Node.js] Stepping down as Node.js Maintainer in Fedora

2024-06-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 4:07 AM Jan Staněk wrote: > > Hi Stephen! > > Stephen Gallagher writes: > > Just a reminder that I will be orphaning the nodejsXX packages in a > > little over a week. As of yet, no one has requested access to take it > > over. If anyone is g

Re: 2FA policy for provenpackagers is now active

2024-06-24 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 9:28 AM Michael J Gruber wrote: > > Guinevere Larsen venit, vidit, dixit 2024-06-24 13:53:37: > > On 6/24/24 5:08 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > > > Dne 24. 06. 24 v 9:48 dop. Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): > > >> IMO, having the token stored in your password manager means

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

2024-06-21 Thread Stephen Smoogen
packagers. Packagers will need to add yet another bug set to cover and determine "is it only on VX" or not. -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren --

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

2024-06-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 11:52 AM Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Stephen Gallagher said: > > three) and recommend creation of a Fedora "Hardware Life Extension" > > Remix that can provide rebuilds of (a subset of) Fedora that they want > > to run o

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

2024-06-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 10:49 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 03:24:18PM +0100, Tom Hughes via devel wrote: > > On 20/06/2024 15:03, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > > Honestly, I'd like to pitch that we retarget Fedora at x86_64-v3 (yes,

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

2024-06-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Jun 20, 2024 at 8:49 AM Chris Adams wrote: > > Once upon a time, Stephen Smoogen said: > > I don't think Peter meant additional packages since with the i686 it > > didn't mean that. What it did mean was having to understand why two > > architectures might do th

Re: [Node.js] Stepping down as Node.js Maintainer in Fedora

2024-06-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 11:32 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > tl;dr: I'll be stepping down from maintaining the nodejs22, nodejs20 > and nodejs16 packages in Fedora, effective June 30, 2024. I will > continue to maintain libuv. > Just a reminder that I will be orphaning the no

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

2024-06-20 Thread Stephen Smoogen
t, and put into the repositories correctly, that images get made correctly and such. This is continual work because as has been seen any change to one tool in an update can make the others stop working in weird ways. I am not saying this is a 'can't be done'.. but this is not Free Work. The Fedora release

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-06-17)

2024-06-18 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 1:51 PM Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 8:25 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 03:20:07PM +0300, Otto Liljalaakso wrote: > > > Stephen Gallagher

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-06-17)

2024-06-17 Thread Stephen Gallagher
(1) Full meeting notes: https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/meeting_matrix_fedoraproject-org/2024-06-17/fesco.2024-06-17-19.00.log.html On Mon, Jun 17, 2024 at 8:21 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Monday at

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-06-17)

2024-06-17 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2024-06-17 19:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

2024-06-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 10:07 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 09:59:25AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 9:55 AM Daniel P. Berrangé > > wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 09:51:34AM -0400, Stephen

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

2024-06-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 9:55 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 09:51:34AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 8:41 AM Daniel P. Berrangé > > wrote: > > > IOW, if [when] we rebase Fedora to the next QEMU upstream rele

Re: Guidance on individual packages requiring x86_64-v2 baseline ?

2024-06-12 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 8:41 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > There have been various change proposals & associated mailing list threads > over the years about the possibility of moving Fedora compiler toolchain > to build with a newer x86_64 baseline ABI, which have ended up rejected, > with

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-05-31 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 1:22 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Fri, May 31, 2024 at 7:15 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > Looking forward to EPEL 10! More work for me, yay! > Just a few questions - I would have looked them up in the meeting log, > but i

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-05-31 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 2:10 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 8:02 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2024-05-31 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-m

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-05-30 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, May 30, 2024 at 8:02 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-05-31 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: Planning for EPEL 10, derived from ELN Extras. > > Source:

[Node.js] Stepping down as Node.js Maintainer in Fedora

2024-05-29 Thread Stephen Gallagher
tl;dr: I'll be stepping down from maintaining the nodejs22, nodejs20 and nodejs16 packages in Fedora, effective June 30, 2024. I will continue to maintain libuv. It's been a hard decision to come to, but I think this is the correct decision for me. I've been effectively the sole maintainer of

Re: Will there be a gnu/hurd spin when a 64bit hurd is released?

2024-05-27 Thread Stephen Smoogen
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us

Re: Node.js 22.x coming to Rawhide/F41

2024-05-21 Thread Stephen Gallagher
schei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-ejs > > > > > > https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/rubygem-execjs > > > > > > The former is using the latter, so the real issue is likely in the > > > latter. I don't have cycles to investigate more :( > >

Re: rpm-ostree, dnf and bootc in a bootable containers world

2024-05-21 Thread Stephen Smoogen
gt; List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Stephen Smoogen, Re

Re: Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-05-20)

2024-05-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
= # #meeting:fedoraproject.org: FESCO (2024-05-20) !meetingname fesco Chairs: @conan_kudo:matrix.org, @ngompa:fedora.im, @nirik:matrix.scrye.com, @humaton:fedora.im, @zbyszek:fedora.im, @sgallagh:fedora.im, @jistone:fedora.im, @dcantrell:fedora.im,

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-05-20)

2024-05-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2024-05-20 19:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-05-17 Thread Stephen Gallagher
This meeting is canceled due to lack of agenda. On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-05-17 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > > > > Source:

Node.js 22.x coming to Rawhide/F41

2024-05-17 Thread Stephen Gallagher
As of today, I have built Node.js 22.2.0 for Fedora Rawhide. It is currently available as a non-default package (Node.js 20 remains the default during this short transition period). If you maintain a package that depends on Node.js (either runtime or build-time), please take some time in the next

Node.js 22.x coming to Rawhide/F41

2024-05-17 Thread Stephen Gallagher
As of today, I have built Node.js 22.2.0 for Fedora Rawhide. It is currently available as a non-default package (Node.js 20 remains the default during this short transition period). If you maintain a package that depends on Node.js (either runtime or build-time), please take some time in the next

Re: [Input Requested] Ending support for i686 builds of Node.js

2024-05-16 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 3:47 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 9:43 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > Do you think that's worth a separate Change from the Node.js 22 Change > > I already filed? I can amend that (and ask FESCo to re-vote based on >

Re: LLVM Packaging Ideas for Fedora 41

2024-05-15 Thread Stephen Smoogen
Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam,

Re: [Input Requested] Ending support for i686 builds of Node.js

2024-05-14 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 3:38 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 9:33 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 8:21 AM Fabio Valentini > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 2:02 PM Stephen Gallagher >

Re: [Input Requested] Ending support for i686 builds of Node.js

2024-05-14 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 8:21 AM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 2:02 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > > Upstream Node.js has not supported the i686 architecture officially > > since Node.js 10.x (released in 2018). As of Node.js 22, it appears > >

Re: Mass Package Change: Turn deprecated %patchN syntax into %patch -PN

2024-05-13 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 10:09 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 13. 05. 24 v 15:22 Panu Matilainen napsal(a): > > On 5/13/24 16:09, Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> > >> Dne 13. 05. 24 v 11:39 Florian Festi napsal(a): > >>> %patch otoh (now) is a regular (though internally implemented) macro > >>> that is

Re: GIMP 3.0 in F41?

2024-05-13 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 5:23 PM Nils Philippsen wrote: > > On Mon, 2024-05-13 at 14:58 +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: ... > > Why would you push Gimp 3 into Fedora <= 40? > > Why wouldn’t I? It’s technically feasible without really jumping > through hoops, and I don’t want to force users to upgrade

[Input Requested] Ending support for i686 builds of Node.js

2024-05-13 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Upstream Node.js has not supported the i686 architecture officially since Node.js 10.x (released in 2018). As of Node.js 22, it appears that v8 will no longer build at all on that architecture. I'm not particularly willing to go to any great lengths to keep it alive on i686, but I want to know if

Re: Intent to start ARC investigation git-forge replacement

2024-05-08 Thread Stephen Smoogen
ist_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most

Re: calendar.fp.o pointing to obsolete IRC for meetings

2024-05-03 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, May 3, 2024 at 5:18 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > Somehow the news that various (some ? all? ) Fedora meetings have > moved off IRC, to Matrix passed me by. This is not helped by the > official project meeting calendar: > >https://calendar.fedoraproject.org/ > > which continues to

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-05-03 Thread Stephen Gallagher
, 16:05:27) * INFO: Davide and Stephen will present on Fedora ELN at Red Hat Summit's Community Day on Monday in Denver, Colorado. (@sgallagh:fedora.im, 16:12:27) Meeting ended at 2024-05-03 16:18:12 Action items People Present (lines said

Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2024-04-29)

2024-04-29 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Monday at 19:00 UTC in #meeting:fedoraproject.org on Matrix. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2024-04-29 19:00 UTC' Links to all issues to be

Re: Fedora RISC-V port needs to put shared objects into /usr/lib64/lp64d

2024-04-29 Thread Stephen Smoogen
I guess we need to see what RPM owns that symlink and get it into the build root Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 08:22 Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard W. M. Jones: >

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-04-05 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-04-05 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: = #

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Fedora Plasma Workstation (System-Wide)

2024-04-04 Thread Stephen Smoogen
(where os_arch like > "s390x") as s390x, count(os_arch) filter (where os_arch like "armhfp") as > armhfp, count(os_arch) filter (where os_arch like "i386") as > i386,count(os_arch) filter (where os_arch like "arm") as arm, > count(os_arch) filter (wher

Re: Switching XZ for ZSTD?

2024-04-04 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Thu, 4 Apr 2024 at 12:21, Arnie T via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Hello Stephen, > > How a decision to drop xz for some other compression library for software > would be a fairly slow process. First a person who is willing to do the > work would co

Re: Switching XZ for ZSTD?

2024-04-04 Thread Stephen Smoogen
://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard ba

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Fedora Plasma Workstation (System-Wide)

2024-04-04 Thread Stephen Smoogen
ose they should shoot for 100%. It just isn't easy for me to stay on the bus. -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fe

Re: F42 Change Proposal: Fedora Plasma Workstation (System-Wide)

2024-04-03 Thread Stephen Smoogen
t: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-

Re: Three steps we could take to make supply chain attacks a bit harder

2024-04-03 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 7:41 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2024 at 04:38:25PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:55 PM Steve Cossette wrote: > > > > > > I personally would very much agree with enforcing the use of 2fa on th

Re: Three steps we could take to make supply chain attacks a bit harder

2024-04-02 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 3:55 PM Steve Cossette wrote: > > I personally would very much agree with enforcing the use of 2fa on the > Fedora Account System. Maybe take that opportunity to make it a bit more user > friendly? (Such as the fkinit prompt requiring the 2fa code being added at > the

Re: Reminder: F40 final freeze starts next week (2024-04-02)

2024-04-02 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 12:18 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 2, 2024 at 6:08 PM Sandro wrote: > > > > On 26-03-2024 22:15, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 21:34 +0100, Sandro wrote: > > >> On 26-03-2024 16:25, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > >>> So, please take this time to

Re: xz backdoor

2024-04-02 Thread Stephen Smoogen
devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Three steps we could take to make supply chain attacks a bit harder

2024-04-01 Thread Stephen Smoogen
raproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure

Re: Three steps we could take to make supply chain attacks a bit harder

2024-03-30 Thread Stephen Smoogen
t; List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automo

Re: Three steps we could take to make supply chain attacks a bit harder

2024-03-30 Thread Stephen Smoogen
to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedor

Re: xz backdoor

2024-03-29 Thread Stephen Gallagher
Please add “Fedora ELN” as well. We have updates ready that should be composed by midnight tonight, but it should be mentioned in the announcements. On Fri, Mar 29, 2024 at 5:11 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Fri, Mar 29 2024 at 08:16:55 PM +00:00:00, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: > > These

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-03-22 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 9:50 AM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: > >ELN SIG on 2024-03-22 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern > >At fedora-m

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-03-22 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 8:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-03-22 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: * Schedule the "%{rhel} == 11" mass-rebuild --

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Change Compose Settings (system-wide)

2024-03-21 Thread Stephen Smoogen
t; List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Stephen Smoo

Re: Default NodeJS stream packages with versioned names are not available

2024-03-21 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Mar 21, 2024 at 6:28 AM Jan Staněk wrote: > Stephen Gallagher writes: > > That said, I agree that it's completely reasonable to have the default > > version also `Provides: nodejsXX` and I'll look into it. > > Provides is something I did not consider at a

Re: Default NodeJS stream packages with versioned names are not available

2024-03-20 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 12:35 PM Jan Staněk wrote: > > Hello all, > recently, when trying to spin up a CI for NodeJS in Fedora, I ran into a > slight problem: when a NodeJS stream is the default one, versioned > packages (i.e. nodejs20) are not generated and are not installable. > > For example,

[CANCELED] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

2024-03-08 Thread Stephen Gallagher
No agenda, no meeting. See you next time. On Thu, Mar 7, 2024 at 7:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2024-03-08 from 12:00:00 to 13:00:00 US/Eastern >At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat > > The meeting will be about: > > > > Source:

Re: reprodubible builds (re)introduction

2024-03-07 Thread Stephen Smoogen
Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Do not reply to spam, report it: > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue > -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fightin

Re: Flock 2 Fedora 2024 Rochester New York USA

2024-02-28 Thread Stephen Smoogen
28, 2024 at 08:36:19AM -0500, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > I had not seen any announcements on this so wanted to drop it here > > https://flocktofedora.org > > > Thanks for posting this! Can we get it out to devel-announce too? > > Best regards, > > -- > Michel Lind

Flock 2 Fedora 2024 Rochester New York USA

2024-02-28 Thread Stephen Smoogen
to attend Flock, the organizers will book your travel arrangements (e.g. flight, hotel, train, bus, etc.) for you, depending on your sponsorship package. -- Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle. -- Ian MacClaren

Re: SPDX Statistics - Please Please Me edition

2024-02-27 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 09:44, Richard Hughes wrote: > On Mon, 26 Feb 2024 at 15:44, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > I wonder if you have it from a group you are in or if it was the general > creep of time that has added you to a lot of packages? > > I'm a packager and a provenpack

Re: Current status of OSTree and its handling RPM scriptlets?

2024-02-26 Thread Stephen Gallagher
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 4:51 AM Zdenek Dohnal wrote: > > Hi Jonathan! > > On 2/13/24 16:47, Jonathan Lebon wrote: > > Has it got fixed during the time? Or is there a new technology which > would do the trick for Silverblue and Fedora Linux alike? > > Just a note: I would say "for Silverblue and

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >