On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 04:33, Nicolas Mailhot via devel
wrote:
>
> Le jeudi 16 janvier 2020 à 22:24 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit :
>
> Hi Neal,
>
> > I've also said that I don't think we can handle it as our
> > infrastructure currently stands. Our build system tooling has
> > suffered from a decade
Le jeudi 16 janvier 2020 à 22:24 -0500, Neal Gompa a écrit :
Hi Neal,
> I've also said that I don't think we can handle it as our
> infrastructure currently stands. Our build system tooling has
> suffered from a decade of neglect, and attempts to reinvent or
> improve that have been rebuffed or
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 9:30 PM Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 5:14 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:27:36AM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> > > One potential output of this change would be to have editions choose
> > > what buildroot they are based on.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 5:14 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:27:36AM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> > One potential output of this change would be to have editions choose
> > what buildroot they are based on. As an example, Fedora Server, which
> > has struggled to find its
On Thu, Jan 16, 2020 at 11:27:36AM -0800, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 8:31 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> [snip]
> > > ### Use cases ###
> > >
> > > The first example of such a buildroot is provided by the CPU baseline
> > > testing [1].
> > >
> > > There will be more, since we may
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 8:31 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
[snip]
> > ### Use cases ###
> >
> > The first example of such a buildroot is provided by the CPU baseline
> > testing [1].
> >
> > There will be more, since we may want to work on comps files for
> > Minimization Objective.
>
> Yeah, but comps
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 05:43:26PM +0100, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
...snip...
> --
> Note: The naming is hard here, and while I tend to call it
> “buildroot”, it actually needs to be called “alternative everything,
> except the srpms”.
>
> I think we shouldn’t use the word “variant”,
I really like this proposal. I feel like it's something we needed for a
long time.
More comments inline!
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 5:45 PM Aleksandra Fedorova
wrote:
> Hi, all,
>
> This topic goes along the lines of Matthew’s Operating System Factory
> discussion[1], but with a slightly different
I am chiming in with a slightly long form of +1 because of the lack of
comments.
I think this is HUGE. To be able to connect to new use cases and ideas and
have the bonus of helping a downstream stay more closely connected feels
like a big win!
regards,
bex
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 5:54 AM
Many of us deeply involved in RHEL's production are excited about this
idea. We are looking for ways to do more of the RHEL 9 creation
activities in public and this could help serve that purpose.
Something along these lines would be fantastic because identical
Fedora sources could be used to
Hi, all,
This topic goes along the lines of Matthew’s Operating System Factory
discussion[1], but with a slightly different angle. It also is the
generalization of the Change we have proposed recently [2]
So let me start with the problem:
In Fedora now we have a well known and established
11 matches
Mail list logo
