Hello fellow package maintainers,
we had multiple reports over the last weeks that the fedora-review feature
in Copr produces empty review.txt templates for F40 and Fedora Rawhide. And
as a consequence the Fedora Review Service points to empty review.txt files.
The issue is in the fedora-review
Many thanks Jakub. It is a helpful tool. Hopefully it will also
encourage more community contributions to help improve and update Fedora
Review as well.
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Thanks for working on this Jakub. I think it's quite useful. :)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code
> a year ago I announced
> > <
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/E4TT2PEOSITJ4PJP44L2GQUU4CA6R6B3/#ZJGYOMU6I7LEETQ4YEH6ZJBSC5VEM653
> >
> > and
> > launched the Fedora Review Service
> > <https:
On Saturday, 09 December 2023 at 19:32, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> Hello,
> a year ago I announced
> <https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/E4TT2PEOSITJ4PJP44L2GQUU4CA6R6B3/#ZJGYOMU6I7LEETQ4YEH6ZJBSC5VEM653>
> and
> launched the
Hello,
a year ago I announced
<https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/E4TT2PEOSITJ4PJP44L2GQUU4CA6R6B3/#ZJGYOMU6I7LEETQ4YEH6ZJBSC5VEM653>
and
launched the Fedora Review Service
<https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service>.
Nobod
Once this is
> > > released, I can parse its contents and generate much helpful
> > > comments
> > > for the contributors.
> > >
> > > The end goal is to let contributors go back and forth against the
> > > CI
> > > to fix the most obvious mist
l is to let contributors go back and forth against the
> > CI
> > to fix the most obvious mistakes and then let the reviewers take
> > only the final look.
> >
> > Hopefully, it will be a better experience for everyone.
> >
> >
> > [1] http://frostyx.c
only the final look.
Hopefully, it will be a better experience for everyone.
[1] http://frostyx.cz/posts/running-fedora-review-after-copr-build
[2] https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
[3] https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/463
Jakub, could this service be misbehaving?
See
I created the Fedora Infra ticket
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11028
Jakub
On Sat, Dec 3, 2022 at 1:00 PM Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
>
> > fedora-review require a lot of manual checks from reviewer (especially
> > licenses). It can't be fully automated.
>
> That's true but my goal
> fedora-review require a lot of manual checks from reviewer (especially
> licenses). It can't be fully automated.
That's true but my goal isn't to fully automate the process. A person
will always be required to take the final look and make sure the spec
is reasonably written and the package is
On 02/12/2022 18:20, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
I started working on a service [2] that listens to fedora-messaging
and for every new RHBZ review ticket or a new comment with updated
packages, it submits a build in Copr. Thanks to this [1] feature, Copr
automatically runs the fedora-review tool and
Hello,
> Where does this service currently run? If it's going to be used "in
> anger", perhaps it would be good to put it under fedora-infra control?
Currently running on my laptop. Unpackaged and with hardcoded configuration :-)
But I agree with you. I will soon create a Fedora infra issue and
On Fri, 2022-12-02 at 18:20 +0100, Jakub Kadlcik wrote:
> Hello folks,
>
> for a couple of years now, I've been interested in the Fedora package
> review process. Our queue is in hundreds of waiting packages for as
> long as I can remember. I believe the situation can be improved.
>
> Since
be a better experience for everyone.
>
>
> [1] http://frostyx.cz/posts/running-fedora-review-after-copr-build
> [2] https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
> [3] https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/463
>
> Jakub
> ___
, it will be a better experience for everyone.
[1] http://frostyx.cz/posts/running-fedora-review-after-copr-build
[2] https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
[3] https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-request/463
Jakub
___
devel mailing list -- devel
16 matches
Mail list logo
