Re: Maintanenace of redhat-rpm-macros

2021-08-20 Thread Nick Clifton
Hi Guys, If it helps I would be happy to volunteer to be a co-maintainer, especially when it comes to assembler and linker command line options... Cheers Nick ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Maintanenace of redhat-rpm-macros

2021-08-20 Thread Florian Weimer
* Kevin Fenzi: > I'd also be happy to help, but that said... I wonder if we couldn't ask > the FPC to take it over? Or would that be too slow/too many people to > get things done? Just thinking that they should know the pending > guidelines and what macros make sense, etc. I have been unable to

Re: Maintanenace of redhat-rpm-macros

2021-08-20 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 8/19/21 10:59 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 08:35:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:53:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 03:37:01PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: It's also that redhat-rpm-config has come

Re: Maintanenace of redhat-rpm-macros

2021-08-20 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 12:59:39PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 08:35:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:53:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 03:37:01PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > > > It's

Re: Maintanenace of redhat-rpm-macros

2021-08-19 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 08:35:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:53:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 03:37:01PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > > It's also that redhat-rpm-config has come far from its humble > > > origins:

Re: Maintanenace of redhat-rpm-macros

2021-08-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 06:53:30PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 03:37:01PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > It's also that redhat-rpm-config has come far from its humble > > origins: it originated as a package where Red Hat build > > policy/configuration is set.

Re: Maintanenace of redhat-rpm-macros

2021-08-17 Thread Richard W.M. Jones
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 03:37:01PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > It's also that redhat-rpm-config has come far from its humble > origins: it originated as a package where Red Hat build > policy/configuration is set. Things like vendor name, payload > compression etc. But nowadays there are

Re: Maintanenace of redhat-rpm-macros

2021-08-17 Thread Neal Gompa
On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 12:47 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > > On 8/16/21 11:37 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > Hi Florian and Florian, Adam, Don, Jon, and Panu! > > > > It seems that the (quite fundamental) redhat-rpm-config config package > > could use more maintainer attention. Pull

Re: Maintanenace of redhat-rpm-macros

2021-08-17 Thread Tom Stellard
On 8/16/21 11:37 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Hi Florian and Florian, Adam, Don, Jon, and Panu! It seems that the (quite fundamental) redhat-rpm-config config package could use more maintainer attention. Pull requests tend not to get a reply from the maintainers, so in the end proven

Re: Maintanenace of redhat-rpm-macros

2021-08-17 Thread Panu Matilainen
On 8/17/21 9:37 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: Hi Florian and Florian, Adam, Don, Jon, and Panu! It seems that the (quite fundamental) redhat-rpm-config config package could use more maintainer attention. Pull requests tend not to get a reply from the maintainers, so in the end proven

Maintanenace of redhat-rpm-macros

2021-08-17 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
Hi Florian and Florian, Adam, Don, Jon, and Panu! It seems that the (quite fundamental) redhat-rpm-config config package could use more maintainer attention. Pull requests tend not to get a reply from the maintainers, so in the end proven packagers end up merging stuff [1,2], for better or worse,