Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-13 Thread Raphael Groner
Another problem package cicku has to react in reasonable short time for is now docky with FTBFS in rawhide cause of gcc6: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1307430 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Johannes Lips
Dear all, I would like to formally send a mail requesting some feedback from cicku regarding the maintenance of the backintime package. There is one open bug, which requests an update [1] and additionally a trac ticket [2] was also opened, not by me. I can see, that with an upgrade to later

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Richard Shaw
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Johannes Lips > wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I would like to formally send a mail requesting some feedback from cicku > regarding the maintenance of the

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Johannes Lips wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to formally send a mail requesting some feedback from cicku > regarding the maintenance of the backintime package. Did you actually email cicku directly? I don't see him on CC. josh --

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Johannes Lips
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Johannes Lips wrote: > > Did you actually email cicku directly? I don't see him on CC. > Well, apparently I didn't add him to this e-mail, but he should have received enough notifications from bugzilla already. Additionally from

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Josh Boyer > wrote: >> >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Johannes Lips >> wrote: >> > Dear all, >> > >> > I would like to formally

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Johannes Lips wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Johannes Lips >> > >> Did you actually email cicku directly? I don't see him on CC. >> > Well, apparently I didn't add him to this e-mail, but he

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Johannes Lips
> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Johannes Lips wrote: > > You make a lot of assumptions in that statement. People filter email > quite a bit and relying on bugzilla mail alone is not sufficient. > > I find it ironic that your original email said "I would like to

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Josh Boyer
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Johannes Lips wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:48 PM, Johannes Lips >> > >> You make a lot of assumptions in that statement. People filter email >> quite a bit and relying on bugzilla mail alone is

Re: Non-responsive package maintainer process - backintime

2016-02-12 Thread Jeff Backus
On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 5:04 AM, Johannes Lips wrote: > Dear all, > > I would like to formally send a mail requesting some feedback from cicku > regarding the maintenance of the backintime package. > There is one open bug, which requests an update [1] and additionally a