First of all sorry if i looks like rude on my answers, was not the
intention.
On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> On Monday, August 8, 2016 10:36:11 AM CDT Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> > Not works.
>
> I do not understand what does not work
>
> > You need then talk with
h Pingou and Threebean.
> >>> > > > Thanks to Pingou hints, I've created a query to get pending ACL
> >>>
> >>> from
> >>>
> >>> > > > pkgdb.
> >>> > > > What I'd like to share with you al
pkgdb.
>>> > > > What I'd like to share with you all is the list of users that can
>>> > > > approve/deny ACL requests (older than 1 month) but have not done it
>>> > > > yet (the number refers to the number of ACL pending).
>>>
t; Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know
> >>> what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably:
> >>>
> >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/
> >>>
> >>> Ho
On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 09:45:57AM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, wrote:
> > Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but
> > doesn't want to reject the request for various reasons including the
> > requestor re-request of denied re
Hi,
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, wrote:
> Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but
> doesn't want to reject the request for various reasons including the
> requestor re-request of denied requests.
>
To add few things here,
1) W
gt;>> what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably:
>>>
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/
>>>
>>> However I visited the above URL, logged in, and it says:
>>>
>>> Pending ACLs
>
rove/deny ACL requests (older than 1 month) but have not
>done it
>> > > > yet (the number refers to the number of ACL pending).
>> > > >
>> > > > I think that people should take care of the pending ACL they
>can
>> > > > approve/d
On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:23:31 +0100
Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 04:36:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I've checked again just now, and I still don't see those ACLs.
>
> My guess is that it's a PkgDB bug and for this reason I'm trying to
> get in touch with
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 10:26:36AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati
> wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> >> I have a strong opinion over this
> >>
> >> All the ACL's should be accepted, doesn't m
On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 04:36:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I've checked again just now, and I still don't see those ACLs.
My guess is that it's a PkgDB bug and for this reason I'm trying to get
in touch with Pingou.
Cheers,
Fale
--
Fabio Alessandro Locati
Red Hat - Senior Consultant
n this case it's probably:
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/
> >
> > However I visited the above URL, logged in, and it says:
> >
> > Pending ACLs
> > No pending ACLs for you
> >
> > So I guess this is wrong or p
>
> However I visited the above URL, logged in, and it says:
>
> Pending ACLs
> No pending ACLs for you
>
> So I guess this is wrong or perhaps refers to something else:
>
> ...
> > 3 rjones
> ...
Hi Richard,
It seems like pkgdb is hiding those ACL reques
On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati
wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
>> I have a strong opinion over this
>>
>> All the ACL's should be accepted, doesn't matter the level.
>> And why i think of this ?
>>
>> Two simple reasons:
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote:
> I have a strong opinion over this
>
> All the ACL's should be accepted, doesn't matter the level.
> And why i think of this ?
>
> Two simple reasons:
> - The packager abandoned the package, because several reasons, and th
t; >
> > > > I think that people should take care of the pending ACL they can
> > > > approve/deny and actually approve or deny them ASAP.
> > >
> > > Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know
> > > what
On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:14:02AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:41:56 +0100
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
> > Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know
> > what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably:
> >
> > https://admin.fed
y and actually approve or deny them ASAP.
> >
> > Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know
> > what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably:
> >
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/
>
ey are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably:
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/
>
> However I visited the above URL, logged in, and it says:
>
> Pending ACLs
> No pending ACLs for you
also there should be no action required from
approve/deny and actually approve or deny them ASAP.
Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know
what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/
However I visited the above URL, logg
Hi all,
This morning, during the automation workshop, I had the occasion of
speaking about this with Pingou and Threebean.
Thanks to Pingou hints, I've created a query to get pending ACL from
pkgdb.
What I'd like to share with you all is the list of users that can
approve/deny ACL requests (older
21 matches
Mail list logo
