Re: Pending ACLs

First of all sorry if i looks like rude on my answers, was not the intention. On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > On Monday, August 8, 2016 10:36:11 AM CDT Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: > > Not works. > > I do not understand what does not work > > > You

Re: Pending ACLs

t; > What I'd like to share with you all is the list of users that can > >>> > > > approve/deny ACL requests (older than 1 month) but have not done > >>> > > > it > >>> > > > yet (the number refers to the number of ACL pending). > >

Re: Pending ACLs

he number of ACL pending). >>> > > > >>> > > > I think that people should take care of the pending ACL they can >>> > > > approve/deny and actually approve or deny them ASAP. >>> > > >>> > > Your email needs a "call to

Re: Pending ACLs

;> Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know > >>> what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably: > >>> > >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/ > >>> > >>> However

Re: Pending ACLs

On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 09:45:57AM +0530, Parag Nemade wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 11:07 PM, wrote: > > Sometimes a maintainer doesn't want to approve ACLs for "reasons" but > > doesn't want to reject the request for various reasons including the > > requestor

Re: Pending ACLs

ngs here, 1) Why do we need such "Pending ACLs" weekly emails? The package owner already gets notifications when someone requests ACLs. Now if you say people forgets then why not implement something in pkgdb only which will keep sending weekly notification again to package owners that someon

Re: Pending ACLs

w >>> what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably: >>> >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/ >>> >>> However I visited the above URL, logged in, and it says: >>> >>> Pending ACLs >>

Re: Pending ACLs

>can >> > > > approve/deny and actually approve or deny them ASAP. >> > > >> > > Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will >know >> > > what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's >probably: >> &

Re: Pending ACLs

On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 17:23:31 +0100 Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 04:36:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > I've checked again just now, and I still don't see those ACLs. > > My guess is that it's a PkgDB bug and for this reason I'm trying to >

Re: Pending ACLs

On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 10:26:36AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Aug 6, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Fabio Alessandro Locati > wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: > >> I have a strong opinion over this > >> > >> All the ACL's should be

Re: Pending ACLs

On Sat, Aug 06, 2016 at 04:36:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > I've checked again just now, and I still don't see those ACLs. My guess is that it's a PkgDB bug and for this reason I'm trying to get in touch with Pingou. Cheers, Fale -- Fabio Alessandro Locati Red Hat - Senior Consultant

Re: Pending ACLs

n this case it's probably: > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/ > > > > However I visited the above URL, logged in, and it says: > > > > Pending ACLs > > No pending ACLs for you > > > > So I guess this is wrong or perhap

Re: Pending ACLs

> > However I visited the above URL, logged in, and it says: > > Pending ACLs > No pending ACLs for you > > So I guess this is wrong or perhaps refers to something else: > > ... > > 3 rjones > ... Hi Richard, It seems like pkgdb is hiding those ACL requests on

Re: Pending ACLs

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Helio Chissini de Castro wrote: > I have a strong opinion over this > > All the ACL's should be accepted, doesn't matter the level. > And why i think of this ? > > Two simple reasons: > - The packager abandoned the package, because several reasons, and

Re: Pending ACLs

pending). > > > > > > > > I think that people should take care of the pending ACL they can > > > > approve/deny and actually approve or deny them ASAP. > > > > > > Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know &

Re: Pending ACLs

On Fri, Aug 05, 2016 at 11:14:02AM +0200, Dan Horák wrote: > On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 20:41:56 +0100 > "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: > > Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know > > what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably: > > > >

Re: Pending ACLs

> approve/deny and actually approve or deny them ASAP. > > > > Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know > > what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably: > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgd

Re: Pending ACLs

w > what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably: > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/ > > However I visited the above URL, logged in, and it says: > > Pending ACLs > No pending ACLs for you also there should be no action r

Re: Pending ACLs

ny and actually approve or deny them ASAP. Your email needs a "call to action" link, otherwise no one will know what they are supposed to do about it. In this case it's probably: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/ However I visited the above URL, logged in, and it s

Pending ACLs

Hi all, This morning, during the automation workshop, I had the occasion of speaking about this with Pingou and Threebean. Thanks to Pingou hints, I've created a query to get pending ACL from pkgdb. What I'd like to share with you all is the list of users that can approve/deny ACL requests (older