On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:24:33AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 10/08/2013 08:02 AM, David Tardon wrote:
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 03:29:57AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Shall we talk about how Red Hat employees have been granted all
kinds of privileges within our community without as
On Sat, Oct 05, 2013 at 03:29:57AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Shall we talk about how Red Hat employees have been granted all
kinds of privileges within our community without as even bother to
introduce themselves to the community even to the extent that fesco
is now judging people if
On 10/05/2013 05:34 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 10/04/2013 06:23 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:14:27PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Why should the community participate in this when it turns out that
the the whole WG and the next proposal is nothing but an
On 10/08/2013 06:02 AM, David Tardon wrote:
I respectfully suggest that you be silent if you do not know the facts.
Your credibility is diminishing rapidly with every untrue statement you
put forth.
You did comprehend I was not only talking about PP right?
JBG
--
devel mailing list
On 2013-10-07 13:56, Christian Fredrik Kalager Schaller wrote:
Hi Jóhann,
I do agree with you that the interaction between Red Hat and Fedora
needs to be clearer, and that currently it is a bit vaguely defined and
thus it gives ground to conspiracy theories and feelings of
disenfranchisement.
On 10/08/2013 07:00 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
Hi Johann,
you use the word *the community* in your emails a lot, but I don't see
many others supporting your opinion,
Hi Jiri
There are other ways to than being visible to show support and sometimes
it's not the best strategy to do so.
When
That said, please don't top-post: [1]
Also, please trim irrelevant material [1]
[1]
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#If_You_Are_Replying_to_a_Message
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
On Oct 8, 2013, at 3:24 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com wrote:
People are supporting me plenty privately
This answer does not hold up to scrutiny as a response to Jirka's inquiry. Such
an arrangement requires publicly visible proxies to be credible. An alternative
arrangement
On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 08:27:18AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 10/08/2013 06:02 AM, David Tardon wrote:
I respectfully suggest that you be silent if you do not know the facts.
Your credibility is diminishing rapidly with every untrue statement you
put forth.
You did comprehend I
- Original Message -
On 10/05/2013 07:08 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
So every time you say that, I can't help thinking you're just jealous
they took someone « outside the community » instead of you.
It might not be what you're thinking, but it's really how you sound.
Maybe
On 10/07/2013 08:20 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
- Original Message -
On 10/05/2013 07:08 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
I'd say most of Fedora (and even most of Red Hatters) would quit immediately
in case the company starts behave like you think it behaves. And I'm saying
it as a guy who
2013/10/7 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson johan...@gmail.com
Or people turn a blind eye to the facts on what's actually taking place.
- It places distrust in the community ( as came completely clear on last
FESCO meeting )
Fesco members are all elected by contributors (no nominated members by Red
Hi Jóhann,
I do agree with you that the interaction between Red Hat and Fedora
needs to be clearer, and that currently it is a bit vaguely defined and
thus it gives ground to conspiracy theories and feelings of
disenfranchisement.
That said I think you too need to be open to that Red Hat, like
Quoting Jóhann B. Guðmundsson (2013-10-05 05:29:57)
Shall we talk about how Red Hat employees have been granted all kinds of
privileges within our community without as even bother to introduce
themselves to the community even to the extent that fesco is now judging
people if they are
Am 06.10.2013 22:18, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
On 10/05/2013 07:08 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
So every time you say that, I can't help thinking you're just jealous they
took someone « outside the community »
instead of you.
It might not be what you're thinking, but it's really how you
On 10/05/2013 07:08 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
So every time you say that, I can't help thinking you're just jealous
they took someone « outside the community » instead of you.
It might not be what you're thinking, but it's really how you sound.
Maybe those « individuals » are just more
Le 06/10/2013 22:18, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson a écrit :
You are making the assumption that Red Hat has not already offered me
a job as well as the fact that I would associate my name to a company
when behaves like this.
Good for you...
JBG
I don't think that's what Mathieu meant here and I
On Saturday, October 05, 2013 11:29 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Did you look at the history who signed up to the WG page before it even
got announced to the community?
Who? People who were at Flock and/or had read the meeting logs and knew
about the WG about to be announced.
I knew
On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 8:08 AM, Mathieu Bridon
boche...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Saturday, October 05, 2013 11:29 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Did you look at the history who signed up to the WG page before it even
got announced to the community?
Who? People who were at Flock and/or
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.orgwrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:14:27PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Why should the community participate in this when it turns out that
the the whole WG and the next proposal is nothing but an utter and
total
On 10/04/2013 09:50 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Matthew Miller
mat...@fedoraproject.org mailto:mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
I'm sorry Jóhann, but I can't sit here and watch you make those kinds
of accusations without sharing what I saw and experienced while I
On 10/04/2013 06:23 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Oct 04, 2013 at 03:14:27PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Why should the community participate in this when it turns out that
the the whole WG and the next proposal is nothing but an utter and
total sheninagan on RH behalf as came
22 matches
Mail list logo
