On Fri, 2017-10-20 at 14:41 +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:07 PM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
> > I do need sleep at some point ;)
>
> :-O
>
> > Ive pulled the commits and kicked off the build in the COPR
> >
> > It'll be there in a few
On 20 October 2017 at 12:41, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:07 PM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
>> I do need sleep at some point ;)
>
> :-O
>
>> Ive pulled the commits and kicked off the build in the COPR
>>
>> It'll be
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:07 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> I do need sleep at some point ;)
:-O
> Ive pulled the commits and kicked off the build in the COPR
>
> It'll be there in a few hours or so (however long it takes for the
> build in COPR).
I do want to thank both
On 20 October 2017 at 12:07, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 19 October 2017 at 19:17, Alexander Ploumistos
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Mátyás Selmeci
>> wrote:
>>> Where is the COPR? I searched for "firefox"
On 19 October 2017 at 19:17, Alexander Ploumistos
wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
>> Where is the COPR? I searched for "firefox" on copr.fedorainfracloud.org but
>> did not find it.
>
>
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 9:09 PM, Mátyás Selmeci wrote:
> Where is the COPR? I searched for "firefox" on copr.fedorainfracloud.org but
> did not find it.
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jhogarth/firefox57/
Also, firefox-57.0-0.5 just finished building in koji:
On 10/18/17 07:21, James Hogarth wrote:
On 17 Oct 2017 17:40, "Gerald B. Cox" > wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:33 AM, James Hogarth
> wrote:
And even if we hypothetically forked
On 19 Oct 2017 18:26, "James Hogarth" wrote:
On 18 Oct 2017 13:21, "James Hogarth" wrote:
On 17 Oct 2017 17:40, "Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:33 AM, James Hogarth
wrote:
>
>
On 18 Oct 2017 13:21, "James Hogarth" wrote:
On 17 Oct 2017 17:40, "Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:33 AM, James Hogarth
wrote:
>
> And even if we hypothetically forked Firefox (as that is what it would be)
>
On 17 Oct 2017 17:40, "Gerald B. Cox" wrote:
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:33 AM, James Hogarth
wrote:
>
> And even if we hypothetically forked Firefox (as that is what it would be)
> to add legacy extension capability back it would mark a significant
>
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 1:33 AM, James Hogarth
wrote:
>
> And even if we hypothetically forked Firefox (as that is what it would be)
> to add legacy extension capability back it would mark a significant
> divergence with upstream and I'm not sure if addons.mozilla.org
On 17 October 2017 at 01:19, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Adam Williamson <
> adamw...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>>
>> > According to my reading today that was disabled for the beta and only
>> > present in the developer version to assist in the
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 5:09 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> > According to my reading today that was disabled for the beta and only
> > present in the developer version to assist in the migration and porting
> etc
> >
> > As of FF57 beta WebExtension only is
On 10/16/2017 01:56 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Can you enable "extensions.legacy.enabled"? That would solve the main
> problem.
>
> I had a look at the RPM and grepped the FF sources but I couldn't work
> out how you are supposed to enable that setting, but I guess FF
> maintainers may have
On Tue, 2017-10-17 at 00:05 +0100, James Hogarth wrote:
> On 16 Oct 2017 9:57 pm, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 01:45:09PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26
> >
On 16 Oct 2017 9:57 pm, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 01:45:09PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26
> updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep
>
> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 01:45:09PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>
> Can you enable "extensions.legacy.enabled"? That would solve the main
> problem.
>
> I had a look at the RPM and grepped the FF sources but I couldn't work
> out how you are supposed to enable that setting, but I guess
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 01:45:09PM +0300, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26
> updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep
> getting new builds in koji for f25/f26? Judging by the feedback in
>
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 2:00 AM, Martin Stransky
wrote:
> On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos <
>> alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is
On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 11:00:05AM +0200, Martin Stransky wrote:
> Sure, out of box thinking is not expected here and Vogons could take
> lessons from our council members ;-)
Just wait until you see our poetry!
In seriousness, out-of-the-box thinking should be *encouraged* — but
please in the
On 16 October 2017 at 10:18, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 10/16/2017 11:10 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
>
>> On 16 October 2017 at 10:00, Martin Stransky wrote:
>>
>> On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM,
On 10/16/2017 11:10 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 16 October 2017 at 10:00, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Now that FESCo has ruled
On 16 October 2017 at 10:00, Martin Stransky wrote:
> On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos <
>> alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>>
>>> Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed
On 10/15/2017 03:58 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26
updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep
getting new
On 10/15/2017 11:04 PM, Greg Evenden wrote:
Hello,
Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26
updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep
getting new builds in koji for f25/f26? Judging by the feedback in
bodhi, the various threads here, rhbz and
> Hello,
>
> Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26
> updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep
> getting new builds in koji for f25/f26? Judging by the feedback in
> bodhi, the various threads here, rhbz and FESCo tickets, there is a
>
On Sun, Oct 15, 2017 at 3:45 AM, Alexander Ploumistos <
alex.ploumis...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Now that FESCo has ruled that "firefox 57beta is removed from f25/f26
> updates-testing but stays in f27/rawhide", could we at least keep
> getting new builds in koji for f25/f26? Judging by the
27 matches
Mail list logo