Re: question was: What do we think about always autoreconfing? was: Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

On Mon, 2021-04-19 at 09:27 +0200, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:30 PM David Cantrell > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:26:24AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > >Hijacking this thread originally about > > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > >

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing? (was: Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 3:30 PM David Cantrell wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:26:24AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >Hijacking this thread originally about > >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > > >What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running > >"autor

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing?

On Tuesday, April 13, 2021 3:50:18 PM CEST Florian Weimer wrote: > * Neal Gompa: > > > As I said previously[1], I think doing autoconf upgrades would be less > > painful if we always did that. > > > > [1]: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZZG

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing? (was: Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 11:26:24AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Hijacking this thread originally about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running "autoreconf -i" during builds that use autotools? I think we are likely to

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing?

* Neal Gompa: > As I said previously[1], I think doing autoconf upgrades would be less > painful if we always did that. > > [1]: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/ZZG3SNLFS7BSXQ3JFJDOWUS3WWGTGLR2/ I think that's not actually true: If we do not

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing?

On Tue, 2021-04-13 at 08:33 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:24 AM Florian Weimer > wrote: > > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > > > Hijacking this thread originally about > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > > > > > What is the current thinking in Fedora

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing?

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 02:24:20PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > Hijacking this thread originally about > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > > > What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running > > "autoreconf -i" during builds that

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing?

On Tue, Apr 13, 2021 at 8:24 AM Florian Weimer wrote: > > * Richard W. M. Jones: > > > Hijacking this thread originally about > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > > > What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running > > "autoreconf -i" during builds that use autot

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing?

* Richard W. M. Jones: > Hijacking this thread originally about > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running > "autoreconf -i" during builds that use autotools? I would prefer to do it because it aligns with Fedora's goal to

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing? (was: Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 at 11:27, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Hijacking this thread originally about > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 > > What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running > "autoreconf -i" during builds that use autotools? > 1) "autoreconf -i" is not e

Re: What do we think about always autoreconfing? (was: Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

On 4/13/21 12:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Hijacking this thread originally about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running "autoreconf -i" during builds that use autotools? IMO, it's naive wishful thinking, applicable t

What do we think about always autoreconfing? (was: Re: Fedora 35 Change: Autoconf-2.71 (Self-Contained Change proposal))

Hijacking this thread originally about https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Autoconf_271 What is the current thinking in Fedora about always running "autoreconf -i" during builds that use autotools? In Debian it's been recommended for a long time: https://wiki.debian.org/Autoreconf I maintain