I hope the package gets unretired, because the way things are now, even
dnf groupinstall "Audio Production" fails to work.
- Mehdi
On Sun, Jan 5, 2020, 15:11 Guido Aulisi wrote:
> Il giorno dom, 05/01/2020 alle 12.21 +0100, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
> > On 03. 01. 20 19:24, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Il giorno dom, 05/01/2020 alle 12.21 +0100, Miro Hrončok ha scritto:
> On 03. 01. 20 19:24, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > The dep was provided by non-ntk, which got retired about half a
> > > year
> > > ago [1] after FTBFSing since F29 [2].
> >
> > Isn't it
On 03. 01. 20 19:24, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
The dep was provided by non-ntk, which got retired about half a year
ago [1] after FTBFSing since F29 [2].
Isn't it great when the policy designed to remove
breakage from the distribution actually CREATES breakage?
On Sat, Jan 04, 2020 at 12:48:21AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Don't blame Miro for doing the necessary things, just because you don't
> > like the process.
>
> The issue is that I do not agree that this process is necessary to begin
> with.
>
> > We have asked you
Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Don't blame Miro for doing the necessary things, just because you don't
> like the process.
The issue is that I do not agree that this process is necessary to begin
with.
> We have asked you multiple times to suggest a policy that works for you
> too, but you haven't
On Fri, Jan 3, 2020, 19:25 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > The dep was provided by non-ntk, which got retired about half a year
> > ago [1] after FTBFSing since F29 [2].
>
> Isn't it great when the policy designed to remove
> breakage from the distribution actually
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> The dep was provided by non-ntk, which got retired about half a year
> ago [1] after FTBFSing since F29 [2].
Isn't it great when the policy designed to remove
breakage from the distribution actually CREATES breakage? Retiring packages
with no regards to
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 08:36:45AM -0500, Code Zombie wrote:
> Hi
>
> lv2-sorcer cannot be installed on Fedora 31. Seems like the libntk lib
> needed by the package is not provided by any packages. The full
> installation error is as follows:
Looks like non-ntk library failed to build for last
On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 08:36:45AM -0500, Code Zombie wrote:
> Hi
>
> lv2-sorcer cannot be installed on Fedora 31. Seems like the libntk lib
> needed by the package is not provided by any packages. The full
> installation error is as follows:
>
> ```
> sudo dnf install lv2-sorcer
> Last
Hi
lv2-sorcer cannot be installed on Fedora 31. Seems like the libntk lib
needed by the package is not provided by any packages. The full
installation error is as follows:
```
sudo dnf install lv2-sorcer
Last metadata expiration check: 0:32:35 ago on Fri 03 Jan 2020 08:00:41 AM
EST.
Error:
10 matches
Mail list logo
