Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 73.2

Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2023/07/12 7:35: On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 11:06 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Yes I think it's better if you could proceed with brltty. Note I pushed a commit earlier today which excludes %{ix86} from the OCaml subpackage. In OCaml 5 / Fedora 39 we are going to dro

Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 73.2

Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2023/07/12 17:18: On Wed, Jul 12, 2023 at 8:36 AM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: I am not the maintainer of brltty, but just adding "BR: gcc" makes brltty compile on all arches (against f39): https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=103255038 I am n

Re: RFC: Roadmap for DNF5 in Fedora 39 / invoking the Contingency Mechanism

DJ Delorie wrote on 2023/07/14 9:13: Fabio Valentini writes: in Fedora 39 - whether the switch still looks doable for this release, or whether it should be reverted for F39 and postponed to F40. I spent most of yesterday repairing a rawhide VM that had a bad upgrade, resulting in dnf segfault

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2023/07/25 21:24: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 39 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 2

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired this week

Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote on 2023/08/01 0:19: On Monday, 31 July 2023 at 12:13, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 39 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly remi

rawhide buildroot seems weird state, Child return code was: 255

Hello, all: Looks like currently rawhide buildroot seems weird state, mainly on ppc64le, but sometimes also on other arches: e.g. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105650426 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=105642860 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskin

Re: libxml2 2.12.0 (and 2.12.1) in rawhide, with some API breaks

Frederic Berat wrote on 2023/11/27 22:23: On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:07 PM David King wrote: The latest released versions of libxml2 have a couple of important changes in header files that have unintentionally caused some packages to fail to build without modification, including: * several fu

Re: [HEADS UP] Jasper update with .so name update

Orion Poplawski wrote on 2023/11/28 11:26: On 11/27/23 13:31, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2023-11-21 at 10:55 +0100, Josef Řídký wrote: Hi, there is a new jasper version (4.1.0) that will be available in Fedora 40+. As this version is bumping it's .so name, the rebuild of the dependent pack

Re: libxml2 2.12.0 (and 2.12.1) in rawhide, with some API breaks

Frederic Berat wrote on 2023/11/27 22:23: On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 12:07 PM David King wrote: The latest released versions of libxml2 have a couple of important changes in header files that have unintentionally caused some packages to fail to build without modification, including: * several fu

Re: Proven to be sickened

Sérgio Basto wrote on 2023/12/02 0:49: On Fri, 2023-12-01 at 16:26 +0100, Michael J Gruber wrote: So, due to me following my package (notmuch) upstream and testing early against upstream's git, reporting and working with upstream, I noticed a FTBFS and helped fixing it. Nothing urgent since it w

Re: Are package-owner mail addresses working?

Sergio Pascual wrote on 2024/01/01 21:36: Hello and happy new year. Are package-owner mail addresses working? I have send mails to several and they return a 550 error message, for example: 550 5.1.1 : Recipient address rejected: User unknown in local recipient table Best, Sergio -- Currently

Re: [Fedora-packaging] BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot ... see root.log ...

Brad Bell wrote on 2024/01/18 14:00: I got the Result in the subject above for the following build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=111912575 Looking at the corresponding root.log https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/2575/111912575/root.log does not indicate to me w

Re: HELP! What's up with OpenVDB?

Richard Shaw wrote on 2024/01/25 12:43: So with the tbb[1] update OpenVDB is one of the stragglers having issues that need to be addressed before I can build OpenImageIO. Looking at the releng rebuilt attempt it failed on ppc64le. I kicked off the build again[2] and this time it failed on s390x:

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2024/01/25 1:38: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 5 w

Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide soon

Sandro wrote on 2024/01/30 22:02: On 30-01-2024 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote: Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34: Hi, I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide before the branching tog

Re: Failure on fedora default backgrounds

Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2024/02/02 10:25: Hello team, It appears a change within %{_kde4_datadir} macro caused failures on Rawhide affecting default Fedora backgrounds starting from 21. Could someone from KDE SIG address that issue? Thanks. Here is an extract of failure[1]  on for f35-back

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2024/02/04 2:17: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 40 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 4 w

Re: help needed with failing eccodes build for f40

Petr Pisar wrote on 2024/02/29 18:35: V Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 10:02:32AM +0100, Jos de Kloe napsal(a): Dear all, while doing koji builds for the latest eccodes version 2.34.1 I ran in to an issue that is puzzling to me, and I have no idea to solve this. The build runs just fine for f38, f39 and

Follow up for bash-completion pkgconfig file packaging change

Hello, all: After investigating the recent Fedora-Security-Live livespin compose failure on F-41, it is found that this is caused because: - Recently on F-41, bash-completion packaging changed so that pkgconfig file is moved into -devel subpackage: (bash-completion-2.11-15.fc41) https://src

Re: gsl soversion bump

Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote on 2022/08/23 5:54: On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:08 PM Susi Lehtola wrote: Hello, gsl will be updated from version 2.6 to 2.7.1 which changes the soversion from .25 to .27 in one week. List of dependent packages $ for rpm in $(repoquery --disablerepo=* --enabler

Re: gsl soversion bump

Kevin Fenzi wrote on 2022/08/23 10:12: On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 09:23:51AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote on 2022/08/23 5:54: On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:08 PM Susi Lehtola wrote: Hello, gsl will be updated from version 2.6 to 2.7.1 which changes the soversion

Re: gsl soversion bump

Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/08/23 16:58: Kevin Fenzi wrote on 2022/08/23 10:12: On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 09:23:51AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote on 2022/08/23 5:54: On Thu, Aug 11, 2022 at 12:08 PM Susi Lehtola wrote: Hello, gsl will be updated from version

Re: Build failure on f37-x86_64, stdlib.h: No such file or directory

Bruno Postle wrote on 2022/09/04 17:44: Can someone give me hint as to what I'm doing wrong here, I have a C++ package that builds fine for f35 & f36 with x86_64 & aarch64, but which fails on f37-x86_64 (the build is ok on f37-aarch64): https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bpostle/IfcOpenShel

Re: Orphaned various packages (GNOME / GObject libraries)

Fabio Valentini wrote on 2022/09/06 18:45: Hi all, Since the Pantheon desktop will not be available on Fedora 37+ for the foreseeable future (libsoup3pocalypse etc.), I am no longer interested in maintaining some of its dependencies or "shared" components that are still used by existing applicat

Re: Build failure on f37-x86_64, stdlib.h: No such file or directory

Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/09/05 8:40: Bruno Postle wrote on 2022/09/04 17:44: Can someone give me hint as to what I'm doing wrong here, I have a C++ package that builds fine for f35 & f36 with x86_64 & aarch64, but which fails on f37-x86_64 (the build is ok on f37-aar

Re: libFLAC soname bump

Miroslav Lichvar wrote on 2022/09/15 16:14: On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 06:09:16PM -0500, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: I tried to rebuild them all except chromium which I suspect would take too much space and time. Only ardour6, audacity, and xmms2 failed, for unrelated reasons. All the packages

Re: libharu soname bump for rawhide

Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote on 2022/10/05 18:02: I understand the necessity of time to react, may be should handle it in a more proper way. I was triggered by maintainer of only dependent package (directly dependent) so I strongly believe it's OK in this case. Seems not actually: dnf repoque

Re: libharu soname bump for rawhide

Orion Poplawski wrote on 2022/10/05 22:25: On 10/5/22 07:11, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Dmitrij S. Kryzhevich wrote on 2022/10/05 18:02: I understand the necessity of time to react, may be should handle it in a more proper way. I was triggered by maintainer of only dependent package (directly

Re: openshadinglanguage failure on non x86_64

Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2022/10/10 2:46: Hello team, openshadinglanguage 1.12.6.2 only successfully built on x86_64 architecture but failed on others due to the following errors: In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage-1.12.6.2/src/liboslexec/oslexec_pvt.h:42,

Re: openshadinglanguage failure on non x86_64

Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/10/10 10:09: Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 2022/10/10 2:46: Hello team, openshadinglanguage 1.12.6.2 only successfully built on x86_64 architecture but failed on others due to the following errors: In file included from /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenShadingLanguage

Re: [side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

Zdenek Dohnal wrote on 2022/10/10 17:17: Hi all, I maintain qpdf in Fedora, which recently got a new major release version, which breaks compatibility with other packages, so I created a side tag for other maintainers to use for building, and then releasing it altogether in rawhide. However

Re: libxml2-2.10.3-1.fc36 breaks (part of) GraphicsMagick

Michael J Gruber wrote on 2022/10/29 5:19: With this libxml2 update: ``` gm convert -list format ... gm convert: Unable to load module ("/usr/lib64/GraphicsMagick-1.3.38/modules-Q16/coders/url.la: file not found") ``` In fact, `url.so` is there but cannot be dlopen'ed. This works after downgrad

Re: Help needed with build failing in Koji for rawhide i686

Sandro wrote on 2022/11/13 6:37: On 12-11-2022 22:21, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: On 12/11/2022 22:09, Sandro wrote: I did an 'rpm -qf /lib/libsndfile.so.1' and that pointed me to the libsndfile package, which wasn't updated recently. It looks like --disable-largefile flag changed ABI and

Re: yaml-cpp 0.7.0 soname bump for Rawhide is complete

Richard Shaw wrote on 2022/11/16 1:10: I had to back off updating OpenColorIO as it needed a newer version of minizip-ng than what's available. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-518f2de934 The only fallout is supercollider which failed to build for other reasons: https://koji

Re: zdohnal pushed to tests/vim (main). "upstream-unittests: Apply RPM workaround for package notes from Ruby (..more)"

notificati...@fedoraproject.org wrote on 2022/11/23 20:34: Notification time stamped 2022-11-23 11:34:19 UTC From 1f016e5dedbb5bc7293c1638e1238989d6fabaa5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zdenek Dohnal Date: Nov 23 2022 11:30:01 + Subject: upstream-unittests: Apply RPM workaround for package

Re: [HEADS UP] Rebuild of wxGTK wxGLCanvas-using packages

Scott Talbert wrote on 2022/11/24 2:23: Hi all, In order to fix some incompatibilities with wxWidgets wxGLCanvas (which is currently built with OpenGL EGL support) and several package users which are expecting OpenGL GLX support, I need to rebuild wxWidgets with a different configuration opti

Re: heads up: doxygen 1.11.0 is breaking lots of builds

Orion Poplawski wrote on 2024/05/29 12:09: See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2283362 Maybe better requesting untag? Regards, Mamoru -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@

Re: Unresponsive maintainer

Hello, alick9...@gmail.com wrote on 01/20/2018 12:59 PM: Hi All, As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers, I am posting here to see if anyone know how to contact Christoph Wickert (cwickert). The bug report is at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug

Re: -z defs linker flag activated in Fedora rawhide

Florian Weimer wrote on 01/23/2018 12:24 AM: In some cases (such as when a DSO is loaded as a plugin and is expected to bind to symbols in the main executable), undefined symbols are expected.  In this case, you can add     %undefine _strict_symbol_defs_build to the RPM spec file to disable t

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

Dennis Gilmore wrote on 02/13/2018 08:06 AM: Hi All, We have now completed the automated part of the Fedora 28 mass rebuild, The details for the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 28 can be found here[1]. The failure page for the rebuilds can be found here[3] and the full list of packages that ar

Re: vdr-live build fails for rawhide

Martin Gansser wrote on 02/14/2018 05:19 PM: when building vdr-live for rawhide it fails [1] for ppc64le and ppc64 when adding "-Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess" to the build flags, then it fails [2] for s390x. %build make CFLAGS="%{optflags} -fPIC" CXXFLAGS="%{optflags} -fPIC -Wsizeof-pointer-memac

Re: vdr-live build fails for rawhide

Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 02/14/2018 08:21 PM: Martin Gansser wrote on 02/14/2018 05:19 PM: when building vdr-live for rawhide it fails [1] for ppc64le and ppc64 when adding "-Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess" to the build flags, then it fails [2] for s390x. %build make CFLAGS="%{

Re: Koji build: cannot find spec file

Jerry James wrote on 02/18/2018 09:48 AM: This is the second of two attempts to build sympy this evening, both of which failed the same way: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25124365 According to mock_output.log, the spec file can't be found. What is going on? Reported to

Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes

Vít Ondruch wrote on 03/01/2018 06:44 PM: Dne 1.3.2018 v 03:19 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): Fabio Valentini wrote: AFAICT, those "broken deps in rawhide" mails are only sent if there is a compose, and during the past weeks, there have been few of those ... so breakage is sometimes allowed to sit u

Re: Need assistance to build openvdb for both Blender and LuxRender

Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 03/02/2018 03:00 PM: Hello team, openvdb currently failed for some odd reasons (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25408808) on both Rawhide and F28 in order to rebuild for boost 1.66. Looking for tail result from build.log, it seems the mockbuild hit

oniguruma 6.8.1 will hit rawhide and F-28 with soname bump

Hello, all: I am going to update oniguruma to 6.8.1 on rawhide and F-28. Compared to 6.7.1, two symbols are removed (although I don't think these symbols are used by other packages) and so this will cause soname bump. I will rebuild all affected packages below: jq-0:1.5-11.fc28.x86_64 kitutuki

Re: Heads up: openjpeg2-2.5.0 and gdal-3.5.0 coming to rawhide

Sandro Mani wrote on 2022/05/23 3:39: Hi - gazebo fails to build due to "cannot convert 'ALCdevice*' to 'ALCdevice_struct*' in assignment", which looks like an openal-soft-1.21 incompatibility. Possibly updating gazebo from the currently packaged v10.1.0 to current upstream version 11.10.2 mi

Re: Archive value is out of time_t range

Antonio T. sagitter wrote on 2022/06/02 23:33: Hi all. rpmuncompress is failing in Rawhide i686 architecture only with: /usr/bin/tar: Archive value 4027676192 is out of time_t range -2147483648..2147483647 /usr/bin/tar: icecat-91.10.0/extensions/gnu/jid1-KtlZuoiikVfFew@jetpack/bundle.js: imp

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Ben Beasley wrote on 2022/07/12 1:50: Two of the three packages I tried to rebuild (bear and fmidi) failed with errors like: /usr/include/fmt/core.h:1733:7: error: static assertion failed: Cannot format an argument. To make type T formattable provide a formatter specialization:https://fmt.dev

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden wrote on 2022/07/19 16:58: On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 09:48:33AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dear Ewoud, Dne 12. 07. 22 v 15:16 Ewoud Kohl van Wijngaarden napsal(a): On Tue, Jul 12, 2022 at 01:03:59PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: rubygem-bundler_ext   

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote on 2022/07/19 18:31: On 19/07/2022 01:28, Miro Hrončok wrote: I see https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ee990d1f61 was pushed with just a handful of builds, while many others are broken. What happened here? Maintainers had 1 week to rebuild all t

Re: Announcing fmt library soversion bump

Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote on 2022/07/11 2:43: Hello. fmt 9.0.x update will include a soversion bump from .8 to .9. It has both API and ABI changes. Changelog: https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/releases/tag/9.0.0 The list of affected packages in Rawhide: 0ad OpenImageIO cantera ceph dolphin-e

Re: Fedora 37 mass rebuild started

Richard Shaw wrote on 2022/07/21 10:52: Looking at brasero I can build "fine" doing a fedpkg mockbuild but adding "--enablerepo=local" replicates the failure seen in koji[1]. I tried comparing the root logs between the two to see what's different but I don't find the results particularly helpful

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

Kalev Lember wrote on 2022/07/24 22:42: On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 8:58 AM Paolo Bonzini wrote: glib2 switched to pcre2 in rawhide recently. Can you check if qemu needs to be updated for that now so that it BuildRequires pcre2-static instead? https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/glib2/c/34b203d

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

Kalev Lember wrote on 2022/07/25 0:45: On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 4:45 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Kalev Lember wrote on 2022/07/24 22:42: glib2 switched to pcre2 in rawhide recently. Can you check if qemu needs to be updated for that now so that it BuildRequires pcre2-static instead? https

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching (August 2022). Policy: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Fails_to_build_from_

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in August

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 22:40: On 26. 07. 22 15:07, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/07/26 21:28: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 37 approximately one week before branching

Re: [rawhide] ICU upgrade to 71.1

Frantisek Zatloukal wrote on 2022/08/02 23:17: Hmm, I am really sorry for this, I'd messed up a lot somehow. I'll take a deeper look tomorrow morning, but from a quick look: - webkit is now being built against the new icu, passed on i686 of> architectures, it'll hopefully be done before the ne

Re: Updating asio in rawhide (and possibly F37) to 1.24.0

Julian Sikorski wrote on 2022/08/14 19:06: Am 14.08.22 um 11:24 schrieb Julian Sikorski: Dear maintainers, I have updated Fedora asio package from the current 1.16.1 to 1.24.0. I have rebuilt the seven current dependencies and with the exception of OpenSceneGraph, all build fine against the u

Re: kpmcore soname bump in Rawhide, F33, F32

Mattia Verga via devel wrote on 2020/10/17 19:05: Hello all, I've been warned by kpmcore maintainer about a soon-to-be-disclosed CVE, so I would like to upgrade kpmcore to 4.2.0 in all Fedora active releases. This will involve a soname bump, I will rebuild all the affected packages I'm aware of

Re: Where is python3.9-debuginfo?

Orion Poplawski wrote on 2020/10/21 11:19: What am I doing wrong?  This is on my rawhide VM. $ sudo dnf --enablerepo=*-debuginfo install python3.9-debuginfo Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:06 ago on Tue 20 Oct 2020 08:08:20 PM MDT. No match for argument: python3.9-debuginfo Error: Unable to

Re: Rawhide build failure on strange archs

Steve Dickson wrote on 2020/11/08 5:26: Hello, I'm getting a build failure on the armv7hl arch and the i686 arch, which do not make much sense. The build is [1] and only those arche are complaining about an sprintf() statement. The rest of the arches are fine with the statment... %99.9 of the

Re: nfs-utils: compiler error tracking strlen on Rawhide armv7hl and i686

John Reiser wrote on 2020/11/09 13:21: If you want help then please supply the complete source code.  I could not locate the downloadable source for    [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=55125502 even after following several links. Replying to this instead of the people

Re: error: static assertion failed: comparison object must be invocable as const

Martin Gansser wrote on 2020/12/19 21:03: Hi, marsshooter-0.7.6 fails on rawhide with this error message [1]: /builddir/build/BUILD/M.A.R.S.-marsshooter-0.7.6/src/Hud/TabStats.cpp:68:140: required from here /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_tree.h:785:15: error: static assertion failed: comparis

Re: LXQT: FTBFS Requires

Евгений Пивнев wrote on 2020/08/07 20:07: 1. libsysstat and libqtxdg required by LXQT only (?) 2. they are incompilable now in f33 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864053 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864039

Re: aobook - reviving review request?

Andy Mender wrote on 2020/08/12 4:49: Hello all :) I was just going through the swath of "needinfo cancelled" emails and a certain package piqued my interest: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289070 Just wanted to clarify, if I'm interested in this package, the closed bug report sho

Re: Buildroot overrides in branched pre updates-testing activation?

Fabio Valentini wrote on 2020/08/16 23:24: Hi everybody, I've just noticed that bodhi allows users to create buildroot overrides for F33 for no good reason (updates-testing is not even active yet and updates to to stable directly). There's 41 (!) active overrides for F33: https://bodhi.fedorapr

Re: ImageMagick Unresponsive Maintainer process - hubbitus (Pavel Alexeev)

Kevin Fenzi wrote on 08/01/2017 04:13 AM: ok, I rebuilt the following ones. The ones with F next to them failed to build: F rubygem-rmagick-2.16.0-3.fc26.src.rpm Fixed on rawhide. Regards, Mamoru ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

Adam Williamson wrote on 08/05/2017 05:00 AM: On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote: Hi, I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: boomaga calligra cups-filters evas-generic-loaders gambas3

Re: Is it a bug in DNF or a fault by maintainer?

Christopher Meng wrote on 11/17/2017 10:59 PM: Hi all, As mostly described in the bug[1], I encountered upgrade path issue from 26 to rawhide, which has been here for a long time preventing a complete update without manual exclusion. DNF in my computer says: # dnf update catfish* 1>/dev/null

Re: HEADS UP: Update to tesseract-5.0.0 in rawhide

Sandro Mani wrote on 2021/12/15 20:15: On 15.12.21 11:11, Michael J Gruber wrote: Are you planning to bring these to F35, as well? Tesseract-5.0.0  appears to be mostly a bugfix release along with some other improvements, so I dunno (and haven't tested so far - the heads up was a few hours be

Re: Non-responsive maintainer check for kaigai

Remi Collet wrote on 2021/12/21 23:42: Hi, This is a non-responsive maintainer check for kaigai I've been maintaining php-pecl-selinux for a while and I've also taken upstream lead developement for it See https://pecl.php.net/package/selinux Filed a bug for EPEL-9 branch https://bugzilla.redha

glibc-2.34.9000-33.fc36 untagged causing lots of dependency breakage

Hello: Looks like glibc-2.34.9000-33.fc36 was tagged into f36 buildroot on 2021-12-18, but very recently untagged from f36 buildroot. Many binary rpms rebuilt recently have "Requires: glibc >= 2.34.9000-33.fc36" ( for example firefox has: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=2865595

Re: Question regarding debugging with gdb

JT wrote on 2021/12/28 23:22: I didn't find the BT that helpful... Although it's possible I've completely forgotten everything I previously knew about gdb and I need to relearn everything from the ground up. I'm perplexed by the BT because the first of the steps it shows on the way to the segfaul

Re: Unannounced soname bump of libre2

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/01/08 20:05: On 08. 01. 22 11:39, Miro Hrončok wrote: The re2 package was updated today in Rawhide and bumped soname from libre2.so.0a to libre2.so.9. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/re2/c/dafa514 Seven packages are broken: dnsdist: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s

Re: s390 ruby build failure

Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2022/01/21 18:26: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=81534987 /usr/share/ruby/mkmf.rb:471:in `try_do': The compiler failed to generate an executable file. (RuntimeError) This appears to be a compiler problem that only affects ruby builds on s390x.

Re: F36 Change: Package information on ELF objects (System-Wide Change proposal)

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on 2022/01/24 17:55: On Sat, Jan 22, 2022 at 08:54:02PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: On Fri, Jan 21, 2022 at 5:35 PM Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Sorry for the necro but there seems to be a problem with this change. It broke multiple packages at the linking stage:

Re: FC35: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr

Martin Gansser wrote on 2022/01/28 21:19: Hi, vdr plugin vdr-epg2vdr prints the following message to the log file [1]: vdr[30484]: [30484] loading plugin: /usr/lib64/vdr/libvdr-epg2vdr.so.2.4.7 vdr[30484]: [30484] ERROR: /usr/lib64/vdr/libvdr-epg2vdr.so.2.4.7: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr r

Re: FC35: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr

Martin Gansser wrote on 2022/01/28 22:05: but building [1] on rawhide it fails with this error [2]: /usr/bin/ld: cannot open linker script file /builddir/build/BUILD/vdr-2.6.0/.package_note-vdr-2.6.0-3.fc36.x86_64.ld: No such file or directory collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make: *

Re: FC35: undefined symbol: PyObject_Repr

Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/01/29 8:00: Martin Gansser wrote on 2022/01/28 22:05: but building [1] on rawhide it fails with this error [2]: /usr/bin/ld: cannot open linker script file /builddir/build/BUILD/vdr-2.6.0/.package_note-vdr-2.6.0-3.fc36.x86_64.ld: No such file or directory collect2

Re: Carla: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f36 - error: aggregate 'std::array sizes' has incomplete type and cannot be defined

Martin Gansser wrote on 2022/01/29 23:02: Hi, when building Carla on rawhide the compilation fails with the following error message [1]: Compiling juce_gui_basics.cpp In file included from juce_gui_basics.cpp:265: native/x11/juce_linux_XWindowSystem.cpp: In member function 'juce::BorderSize j

Re: hdf5 fortran build failure with gcc 12

Orion Poplawski wrote on 2022/01/30 3:48: hdf5 is starting to fail to build with gcc 12 in rawhide with: make[2]: Entering directory '/builddir/build/BUILD/hdf5-1.12.1/build/fortran/test' /bin/sh ../../libtool  --tag=FC   --mode=link gfortran -std=f2008 -Waliasing -Wall -Wcharacter-truncation -

Re: hdf5 fortran build failure with gcc 12

Dave Love wrote on 2022/02/01 19:20: Orion Poplawski writes: On 1/29/22 19:40, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Looks like "minusone" variable looking like constant value defined in fortran/test/tH5A_1_8.F90 needs PARAMETER attribute. Tried this diff: ``` diff --git a/hdf5.spec b/hdf5.

Re: emacs uninstallable in Rawhide at the moment

Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2022/02/04 21:21: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=82370784 DEBUG util.py:444: Problem: package emacs-1:27.2-9.fc35.x86_64 requires libwebkit2gtk-4.0.so.37()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed DEBUG util.py:444:- conflicting r

Unannounced soname bump: libjasper.so.4 -> libjasper.so.6

Hello, all: On rawhide (f37) jasper is updated from 2.0.33-2 to 3.0.0-1, which causes unannounced soname bump from libjasper.so.4 to libjasper.so.6. What is strange here is that the committer seems aware of this change: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/jasper/c/13f23ce40bfeafccd96ecc8872f965e

Re: JasPer 3.0.0 update in Rawhide and F36

Josef Řídký wrote on 2022/02/11 22:55: Hi, just reminder - a new jasper version is now available in Rawhide. All packages that require jasper, should be rebuilt - in most cases it is all that is needed. In rare occasions more work would be needed - this is valid for packages, which didn't use j

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libjasper.so.4 -> libjasper.so.6

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/02/11 23:29: On 11. 02. 22 15:20, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Hello, all: On rawhide (f37) jasper is updated from 2.0.33-2 to 3.0.0-1, which causes unannounced soname bump from  libjasper.so.4 to libjasper.so.6. What is strange here is that the committer seems aware of

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libjasper.so.4 -> libjasper.so.6

Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/02/11 23:41: Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/02/11 23:29: On 11. 02. 22 15:20, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Hello, all: On rawhide (f37) jasper is updated from 2.0.33-2 to 3.0.0-1, which causes unannounced soname bump from  libjasper.so.4 to libjasper.so.6. What is strange

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libjasper.so.4 -> libjasper.so.6

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/02/13 22:26: On 13. 02. 22 13:32, Josef Řídký wrote: Hi, first of all, I would like to apologize for the mess I've caused by the jasper .so name bump in Rawhide. I entirely forgot the side-tag option and had the old mindset of having rawhide as a "sandbox for new fe

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libjasper.so.4 -> libjasper.so.6

Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2022/02/14 17:47: Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/02/13 22:26: On 13. 02. 22 13:32, Josef Řídký wrote: Hi, first of all, I would like to apologize for the mess I've caused by the jasper .so name bump in Rawhide. I entirely forgot the side-tag option and had the old mi

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libjasper.so.4 -> libjasper.so.6

Jos de Kloe wrote on 2022/02/14 15:56: Hi, eccodes will need to be adapted upstream. I filed an issue there and they will try to fix this a.s.a.p. Untill then, if needed, I could remove use of libjasper since it is an optional feature. For now, I've pushed: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libjasper.so.4 -> libjasper.so.6

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2022/02/13 22:26: On 13. 02. 22 13:32, Josef Řídký wrote: Hi, first of all, I would like to apologize for the mess I've caused by the jasper .so name bump in Rawhide. I entirely forgot the side-tag option and had the old mindset of having rawhide as a "sandbox for new fe

Unannounced soname bump: libwebsockets.so.18 -> libwebsockets.so.19

Hello, all: On f37 / f36 two days ago libwebsockets was updated from 4.2.2 to 4.3.1 which causes unannounced soname bump from libwebsockets.so.18 to libwebsockets.so.19 What is strange here is that the committer seems aware of this change: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libwebsockets/c/ad12

Possibly unexpcted soname change: liblept.so.5 -> libleptonica.so.5.4.0

Hello, all: On f37 / f36 leptonica made some packaging change: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/leptonica/c/e2486ca5bc2578ee629457b854c5e13bb94c1dde?branch=rawhide This caused soname change: liblept.so.5 -> libleptonica.so.5.4.0 , which I guess is unexpected. $ dnf repoquery --quiet --repo=k

Re: Possibly unexpcted soname change: liblept.so.5 -> libleptonica.so.5.4.0

Petr Pisar wrote on 2022/02/25 19:10: V Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 10:46:15AM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA napsal(a): On f37 / f36 leptonica made some packaging change: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/leptonica/c/e2486ca5bc2578ee629457b854c5e13bb94c1dde?branch=rawhide This caused soname change

Re: Free Pascal and the new glibc

Mattia Verga via devel wrote on 2021/09/23 15:11: I've created f35-build-side-46123 and tagged fpc-3.2.2-3.fc35 into that. Lazarus rebuild is in progress. I will take care of rebuilding the other packages listed in bug 1987485 as soon as I can. If the maintainers of those packages want to rebuil

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20211010.n.0 changes

Jerry James wrote on 2021/10/11 23:26: On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 7:26 AM Fedora Rawhide Report wrote: = DOWNGRADED PACKAGES = Package: python-pip-21.2.3-2.fc36 Old package: python-pip-21.2.3-4.fc36 Summary: A tool for installing and managing Python packages RPMs: python

Re: ImageMagick update

Michael Catanzaro wrote on 2021/10/16 0:37: On Fri, Oct 15 2021 at 10:22:36 AM +0200, Remi Collet wrote: Sorry, but such update, with soname change is not acceptable in stable branches. Hi Luya, Please note that soname changes are allowed in rawhide only after a one-week notice period. Sin

Re: glusterfs on armv7

Kaleb Keithley wrote on 2021/10/28 22:41: See https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/3MQ4ZRPS4MOIDG2RPAR6YX43VX2MCOLW/ I have not had a chance to follow through yet with a self contained change... Looks like the same "issue" written on https://www

Re: glusterfs on armv7

Daniel P. Berrangé wrote on 2021/10/29 21:15: On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 07:55:08AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 6:52 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: On Thu, Oct 28, 2021 at 11:16:42AM -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote: Perfect. Thank you Mamoru-san. armv7hl is now back in. g

<    1   2   3   4   >