Those figures are recommended minimums, not requirements. I have a single core
F35 machine which works fine.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
> Fedora will use current CPUs more efficiently, increasing performance
> and reducing power consumption.
I hope the energy usage involved in having to buy new hardware (including
manufacturing and shipping) is taken into account. This proposed change is
incompatible with all 3 of my 64-bit
Neal Gompa ngompa13 at gmail.com writes:
As I recall, Josef Bacik mentioned that he'd be pushing for Btrfs becoming
the default in Fedora 23. At this point, I'm personally convinced that it is
certainly ready and doable for F23.
Perhaps other guys with more experience on this stuff could
The problem of dnf not handling kernel-devel updates correctly (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062997 against dnf and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079906 against kernel) is
apparently not being worked on anymore (queries in both bugs are going
unanswered again,
Felix Miata mrmazda at earthlink.net writes:
Just as a workaround, you CAN make a Windows box use UTC for the RTC...
Multiboot is not a universe limited to Windows and Linux, and certainly not
only the latest version of either. And, there's a whole LAN to consider, not
one PC in isolation.
Andre Robatino robatino at fedoraproject.org writes:
it looks like OS/2 is capable of keeping its RTC in TAI (which AIUI is
basically the same as UTC except that TAI doesn't have leap seconds, so TAI
is real time, and UTC is TAI interspersed with leap seconds, so both
increase monotonically
Felix Miata mrmazda at earthlink.net writes:
AFAIK, Windows is the only OS that has trouble using UTC for the RTC.
Have you ever used DOS or OS/2? I don't remember ever seeing options at
installation time to choose anything other than local in either one. Same for
W95, W98, WXP W7. How
Felix Miata mrmazda at earthlink.net writes:
Why does this bug exist only in Fedora, not in openSUSE or Mageia or *buntu?
All my systems are multiboot, so only a select very few are on UTC. None that
are on UTC have Fedora installed. This means every Fedora boot takes about
twice as long or
Bruno Wolff III bruno at wolff.to writes:
It looks like I got burned by dnf removing the running kernel during update.
Due to dracut / grubby issues only my oldest kernel was bootable. I didn't
notice that the old kernel had been removed until after the machine crashed
(I suspect because
Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com writes:
On Sat, 04 Apr 2015 10:56:26 +0200
Reindl Harald h.reindl at thelounge.net wrote:
fedora-easy-karma don't work for days now
Waiting for Bodhi for a list of packages in updates-testing (F21)...
Cannot query Bodhi:
In order for dnf to be able to handle kernel-devel updates correctly (having
multiple versions of kernel-devel installed, one for each installed kernel),
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1079906 (against the kernel)
must be fixed, but there is no response to status inquiries in the bug.
Is there a standard policy for whether gnome shell extensions are expected
to be constantly updated for the current gnome version when gnome is in a
devel release? For example, in Rawhide, gnome is currently at 3.15.2, so
metadata.json would have to include 3.15.2 for extension version checking
to
Igor Gnatenko i.gnatenko.brain at gmail.com writes:
you forget about DLNA sharing, and some more GNOME services.
I googled for DLNA sharing to find out which ports it uses, and it seems
that all of those ports are closed. Are there any specific ports you would
expect to be open?
BTW, I just
Andre Robatino robatino at fedoraproject.org writes:
using. (BTW, Transmission now seems to automatically open an incoming port -
in F20 and below I had to tell Transmission to use a fixed port instead of a
random one, and manually open that port in the firewall.)
Forgot to mention
Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at writes:
I just happened to look at the firewalld default settings, and I was not
amused when I noticed this:
http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/firewalld.git/tree/FedoraWorkstation.xml
port protocol=udp port=1025-65535/
port protocol=tcp
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Final Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6031#comment:24 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Final Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6031#comment:21 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Final Test Compose 4 (TC4)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6031#comment:18
. Please see the following pages for download links (including delta
ISOs) and
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Final Test Compose 3 (TC3)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6031#comment:10
. Please see the following pages for download links (including delta
ISOs) and
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6031#comment:3 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Final Test Compose 1 (TC1)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6031 . Please
see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
testing
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010#comment:17 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
NOTE: The last compose was RC2.
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010#comment:19 . Please see the
following pages for download
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010#comment:11 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
Roberto Ragusa mail at robertoragusa.it writes:
Are compressed rpms completely impossible to diff efficiently by rsync?
In a word, yes. They're already compressed, so it's unlikely there would be
any matching blocks between old and new rpms for rsync to take advantage of.
(You can verify this
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 4 (TC4)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010#comment:7 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010#comment:2 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and testing
openSUSE 13.2, scheduled for release in November, will have btrfs as the
default filesystem. What are the chances that F22 will follow suit, assuming
openSUSE has no major problems with it?
https://news.opensuse.org/2014/09/22/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Beta Test Compose 1
(TC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/6010 . Please see the following
pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and testing
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Alpha Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5940#comment:13 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
Rex Dieter rdieter at math.unl.edu writes:
* go ahead and push it to -testing, better than waiting not getting pushed
anywhere
+1
* possible policy change: require all updates to get pushed to -testing
initially, regardless of karma
If something needs urgent testing to get pushed to
As per the Fedora 21 schedule [1], Fedora 21 Alpha Test Compose 6 (TC6)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5940#comment:9 .
Please see the following pages for download links (including delta ISOs)
and
Although gnome-tweak-tool does not allow customizing the command line for
Startup Applications, up through F20 you could use the
gnome-session-properties command (in the gnome-session package) to do this.
In F21 and Rawhide, gnome-session-properties is gone. I wanted to start a
gnome-terminal with
Rahul Sundaram metherid at gmail.com writes:
All that being said, what is the criteria for getting a default
configuration line put into yum.conf?
I'd really like to get the deltarpm= line put in there.
File a bug report in yum bug tracker or Red Hat bugzilla against yum as
the component.
drago01 drago01 at gmail.com writes:
Well they should (or have some other source of documentation) ... the
config file isn't really the right place for documentation, given
that it does not get updated once you have edited it once ... you will
miss new options / changed semantics that way.
Gerald B. Cox gbcox at bzb.us writes:
Sigh A gun doesn't require you to go into root mode before using it; and
it doesn't ask you if you are sure before you pull the trigger.
dnf requires root mode _every_ time you use it. Same for asking if you're
sure (unless the -y option is used). Any
Gerald B. Cox gbcox at bzb.us writes:
I also cringe when I see the -y or --assumeyes option mentioned. IMO
that is just inviting disaster.
I'm surprised no one is demanding that be removed. It is dangerous.
Someone might need to use yum or dnf in a script. Personally, that's the
_only_ time
Matthias Clasen mclasen at redhat.com writes:
Did any of your gnome-shell extensions break ?
gnome-shell-extension-fedmsg is still not working in Rawhide (see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1045669 ). This only affects
Fedora so thought I should mention it here.
--
devel
Rahul Sundaram metherid at gmail.com writes:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs#RPM_scriplets_fail_during_updates
Please review it. Do you want me to send the announcement as well?
I replaced the typo scriplet - scriptlet in several places in that page,
including the anchor
NOTE: The 32-bit Install DVD is over its size limit.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808#comment:15 . Please see the
NOTE: The 64-bit Desktop Live is over its size limit.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 5 (TC5)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808#comment:13
. Please see the following
NOTE: The 64-bit LXDE Live is over its size limit.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 4 (TC4)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808#comment:11
. Please see the following pages
NOTE: The 64-bit Desktop and LXDE Lives are over their respective size
limits.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 3 (TC3)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808#comment:8 .
NOTE: The 64-bit LXDE Live is over its size limit.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808#comment:6 .
Please see the following pages
NOTE: The 64-bit LXDE Live is over its size limit.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Test Compose 1 (TC1)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5808 . Please
see the following pages for
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit Security Spins are over their respective size
targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Release Candidate 5
(RC5) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5787#comment:29
NOTE: The 64-bit Desktop Live, and the 32- and 64-bit Security Spins are
over their respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit Security Spins are over their respective size
targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5787#comment:26
NOTE: The 20 Beta RC1 compose was skipped. The last tested compose was TC6.
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit Security Spins are over their respective size
targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including
Michael Schwendt mschwendt at gmail.com writes:
Skype is not included with Fedora. Skype does not (and cannot) influence
which packages are multilib'ed when the repos are composed. Skype 32-bit
doesn't depend on openssl. What on your machine depends on 32-bit openssl
and not openssl-libs?
In
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, and the 32- and 64-bit Security Spins are
over their respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Test Compose 6 (TC6)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit LXDE Live, and the 32- and
64-bit Security Spins are over their respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Test Compose 5 (TC5)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit LXDE Live, and the 32- and
64-bit Security Spins are over their respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Test Compose 4 (TC4)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit
Security Spin, and the 64-bit LXDE and Security Spins are over their
respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Content information, including
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit
Security Spin, and the 64-bit LXDE and Security Spins are over their
respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1)
is now available for testing. Content information, including
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit
Security Spin, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their
respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit
Security Spin, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their
respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit MATE
and Security Spins, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their
respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information,
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit MATE
and Security Spins, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their
respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information,
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit MATE
and Security Spins, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their
respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5)
is now available for testing. Content information,
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit MATE
Spin, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their respective size
targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Test Compose 4 (TC4)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Desktop Live, the 32-bit MATE
Spin, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their respective size
targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Test Compose 3 (TC3)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 32- and 64-bit Desktop Lives, the
32-bit MATE and Security Spins, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are
over their respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Content
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit DVDs, the 64-bit Live Desktop, the 32-bit MATE
and Security Spins, and the 64-bit LXDE and MATE Spins are over their
respective size targets.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Alpha Test Compose 1 (TC1)
is now available for testing. Content information,
Josh Boyer jwboyer at fedoraproject.org writes:
The Board has an open ticket on the naming process. We're working
through it now, but no release names isn't an immediate option
because the last time we proposed that the community vote showed names
were still desired. Hopefully we'll resolve
Toshio Kuratomi a.badger at gmail.com writes:
We could just put the release number into those files and keep the release
name in our heads, I suppose. There wouldn't be a technical downside to
that but I don't know whether people would like that socially or not.
When I said release name I
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit Security Lab Spins are over their size limit of
700 MiB.
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Final Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Final Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5623#comment:18 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
NOTE: The 32- and 64-bit Security Lab Spins are over their size limit of
700 MiB.
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Final Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
NOTE: The 64-bit Live Desktop is over its size target of 1 GB.
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Final Test Compose 6 (TC6)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5623#comment:16
. Please see the
NOTE: TC4 was broken (several DEs failed to appear in the DVD menu) so
it was decided to not announce it and spin TC5 instead. Content
information, including changes, for TC4 can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5623#comment:9 . There are delta
ISOs for TC3-TC4 and TC4-TC5. The
NOTE: The 64-bit Live Desktop is over its size target of 1 GB, and the
64-bit Live LXDE is over its size target of 700 MiB.
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Final Test Compose 3 (TC3)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at
NOTE: The 64-bit Live LXDE is over its size target (700 MiB) and will
not fit on a standard 700 MiB CD.
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
NOTE: The 64-bit Live LXDE is over its size target (700 MiB) and will
not fit on a standard 700 MiB CD.
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
NOTE: The 64-bit Live LXDE is over its size target (700 MiB) and will
not fit on a standard 700 MiB CD.
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
NOTE: 32-bit DVD, and 64-bit Live Desktop and LXDE, are over their size
targets and will not fit on their target media (single layer DVD, 1 GB
USB, and 700 MiB CD, resp.).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content
NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still
oversize (as they have been since 19 Alpha TC3).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Test Compose 4 (TC4)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at
Richard W.M. Jones rjones at redhat.com writes:
To be honest it would be a lot more convincing if someone had done a
study and published the results of it, rather than just linking to
opinions. I was rather hopeful that Neilsen-Norman would have done a
study, but they don't publish their
NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still
oversize (as they have been since 19 Alpha TC3).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Test Compose 3 (TC3)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at
NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still
oversize (as they have been since 19 Alpha TC3).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Test Compose 2 (TC2)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at
NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still
oversize (as they have been since 19 Alpha TC3).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Beta Test Compose 1 (TC1)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at
NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still
oversize (as they have been since 19 Alpha TC3).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
NOTE: All DVD and Live images except KDE Live and SoaS Live are still
oversize (as they have been since Alpha TC3).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
*IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3 through RC2 are over their
size targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE and Live
SoaS). Also, note that this is the first time a TC follows an RC (namely
RC2). This is due to several new unaddressed blockers. Hopefully, the
next
*IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3 through RC1 are over their
size targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE and Live
SoaS).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including
Now that deltarpm support is included in yum, and yum-presto is obsoleted,
are there any plans to include a progress/speed indicator for deltarpm
rebuilding, similar to what yum-presto had? Currently, there's no easy way
to compare the speed of updates using drpms to that without. Even timing
*IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3, TC4, and TC5 are over
their size targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE
and Live SoaS).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
*IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3 and TC4 are over their
size targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE and Live
SoaS).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Test Compose 5 (TC5)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be
*IMPORTANT*: Same images as with 19 Alpha TC3 are over their size
targets (all DVDs and Lives with the exception of Live KDE and Live
SoaS).
As per the Fedora 19 schedule [1], Fedora 19 Alpha Test Compose 4 (TC4)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found
Sérgio Basto sergio at serjux.com writes:
For the first time, Fedora release name have non-ascii and pelican
characters which
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=922433
Could we consider change release name from Schrödinger's Cat to
Schrodingers Cat or other name that not have
Kevin Kofler kevin.kofler at chello.at writes:
I've been told presto=0 in yum.conf works. But I don't use Rawhide so I
haven't tested that.
Thanks, presto=0 or presto=1 work as expected.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I noticed that drpm support is now built into yum and that yum-presto is
obsoleted. I don't see anything in the yum man page or the standard config files
on how to control whether drpms are used. Can it be done without
installing/removing the deltarpm package?
--
devel mailing list
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Release Candidate 3
(RC3) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5406#comment:21 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Release Candidate 4
(RC4) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5406#comment:25 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
A while back I reported corruption of the kernel-devel package when building
dkms modules for kernels = 3.5 - see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=860529 . Specifically, the
System.map file in /usr/src/kernels/* for the corresponding kernel is deleted.
It has now stopped happening as of
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Release Candidate 2
(RC2) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5406#comment:19 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
changes, can be found at
https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5406#comment:15 . Please see the
following pages for download links (including delta ISOs) and
As per the Fedora 18 schedule [1], Fedora 18 Final Test Compose 4 (TC4)
is now available for testing. Content information, including changes,
can be found at https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5406#comment:12
. Please see the following pages for download links (including delta
ISOs) and
Bruno Wolff III bruno at wolff.to writes:
I'm using rawhide and sound is working.
In VirtualBox, sound ONLY works when the guest is Rawhide, not F18, since only
Rawhide has pulseaudio 3.0.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=862976
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Brendan Jones brendan.jones.it at gmail.com writes:
If you look at the build status you can see pulseaudio is hardly
unmaintained.
Rex Dieter has also provided a backport of the latest pulseaudio to use
with early releases. I'm sure he is very amenable to cherry picking
patches from a
1 - 100 of 249 matches
Mail list logo
