Hi Ed,
so since there is no stock in Europe can we assume that the machines
ordered at the UK site will all come with 8.2? Makes support way easier.
- Bert -
On 20.11.2008, at 03:48, Ed McNierney wrote:
> Ton -
>
> Thanks for supporting the G1G1 program with your purchases! This
> year it
Interesting...
So the wiki can't assume new users have 8.2, that means a lot of pages
will need separate "Latest release / Earlier releases" sections and/or
encourage users to upgrade.
I wonder how many users with 8.1 will visit
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities and download more recent acti
Hello
Whenever a jack is plugged in, the audio is routed to the jack instead
of the main speakers. It may not always be desirable (ex: wakeup
clock)
Did try to tweak alsa settings, but I couldn't change that.
Is there a way to override it?
Thanks
Guylhem
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 6:48 PM, Ed McNierney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ton -
>
> Thanks for supporting the G1G1 program with your purchases! This year it
> was extremely important for us to have Amazon stocked with inventory so
> orders could be fulfilled and delivered right away, the first da
Ed,
Thanks for the explanation.
I am not new to OLPC, also participated in the first G1G1, but that XO
is now with my grandson (and has 8.2 on it). Right now I am going to
run olpc-update to get the new XOs on 8.2.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.lapt
Ton -
Thanks for supporting the G1G1 program with your purchases! This year it
was extremely important for us to have Amazon stocked with inventory so
orders could be fulfilled and delivered right away, the first day of the
program. That meant that manufacturing actually had to begin before 8.2
Received my 2 XOs ordered last Monday today.
I was surprised they were booting up in 8.1 with the old sugar
interface and not with 8.2.
I was under the impression 8.2.0 was targeted for G1G1-2008, but this
does not seem to be the case,
at least not for the US machines currently in stock at Amazon.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 8:37 PM, S Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ricardo Carrano wrote:
>
>> For differences between firmware releases:
>> http://dev.laptop.org/pub/firmware/libertas/RELEASE_NOTES.
>> The current recommended firmware release is 22.p18.
>
> Nice, I added these to the http://wiki
s wrote:
> Ricardo Carrano wrote:
>
> > For differences between firmware releases:
> > http://dev.laptop.org/pub/firmware/libertas/RELEASE_NOTES.
> > The current recommended firmware release is 22.p18.
>
> Nice, I added these to the http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Libertas wiki page
>
> I've
Ricardo Carrano wrote:
> For differences between firmware releases:
> http://dev.laptop.org/pub/firmware/libertas/RELEASE_NOTES.
> The current recommended firmware release is 22.p18.
Nice, I added these to the http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Libertas wiki page
I've never flashed the Libertas firmware
Hi!
For differences between firmware releases:
http://dev.laptop.org/pub/firmware/libertas/RELEASE_NOTES.
The current recommended firmware release is 22.p18.
Cheers!
Ricardo Carrano
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 5:59 PM, Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Quick query on the libert
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Quick query on the libertas-usb8388-firmware package. Is the firmware
> version dependent on the kernel version or anything else?
>
> The reason I ask is that the version in joyride is
> 2:5.110.22.p18-1.olpc2 from the old
Ed, CJL, Mel, Greg, and CJB (and maybe others) met on IRC On Wed. 11/19
Minutes:
- Update on January camp and reminder to fill in details on proposals.
GS - January camp proposals update
Exact meeting dates to be set ASAP, target Monday. The conference will
be held either week before or after
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 4:15 PM, Aleix Palet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here you have it (the implicated parts):
> from sugar.activity import activity
> def __init__(self, handle):
> activity.Activity.__init__(self, handle)
> toolbox = activity.ActivityToolbox(self)
> self.set_toolbox(too
Here you have it (the implicated parts):
from sugar.activity import activity
def __init__(self, handle):
activity.Activity.__init__(self, handle)
toolbox = activity.ActivityToolbox(self)
self.set_toolbox(toolbox)
toolbox.show()
self.project = None
self.bgImageOrigin = Point
2008/11/19 Aleix Palet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ok, now with Gary's code when i do resume i get the desired behaviour in the
> __init__ funcion, but i don't get the code of my read_file emthod to be
> called. Do I have to do something special?? thanks!
> Another thing, how can i put the toolbox in a
Hi All,
Quick query on the libertas-usb8388-firmware package. Is the firmware
version dependent on the kernel version or anything else?
The reason I ask is that the version in joyride is
2:5.110.22.p18-1.olpc2 from the old olpc2 branch and the one in Fedora
mainline is 2:5.110.22.p14-1.fc10. So t
Ok, now with Gary's code when i do resume i get the desired behaviour in the
__init__ funcion, but i don't get the code of my read_file emthod to be
called. Do I have to do something special?? thanks!
Another thing, how can i put the toolbox in a pygame window?? because i
don't get to see the toolb
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Looking further at the issues with joyride in particular the
>> following 3 packages:
>>
>> ntpdate
>> olpcsound
>> olpc-logos
>>
>> Looking at the output of the pilgrim build logs [1] I see the following
>> errors:
>>
>> Setting up Install Process
>> Parsing package install ar
>> please untag it. it will be picked up through regular inheritance. by
>> having
>> it tagged any fedora updates will not get picked up automatically.
>
> Hmm, then perhaps I should undo what I did yesterday (tagged 3
> packages in the f10-updates queue for quicker joyride inclusion).
Those w
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Dennis Gilmore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> please untag it. it will be picked up through regular inheritance. by having
> it tagged any fedora updates will not get picked up automatically.
Hmm, then perhaps I should undo what I did yesterday (tagged 3
packages i
On Wednesday 19 November 2008 05:50:29 am Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Looking further at the issues with joyride in particular the
> following 3 packages:
>
> ntpdate
> olpcsound
> olpc-logos
>
> Looking at the output of the pilgrim build logs [1] I see the following
> errors:
>
> Setti
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Jerry Vonau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That is what I saw earlier on firstboot, named assumes a default name and
> starts up without /etc/sysconfig/xs_domain_name, while dhcpd doesn't start
> because /etc/sysconfig/xs_domain_name is not set. Shouldn't dhcpd be set
http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2555
Changes in build 2555 from build: 2554
Size delta: 0.00M
+ntpdate 4.2.4p5-2.fc10
--- Included ntpdate version 4.2.4p5-2.fc10 ---
--
This mail was automatically generated
See http://dev.laptop.org/~rwh/announcer/joyride-pkgs.ht
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 11:50 AM, Peter Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The ntp-ntpdate package is now called just ntpdate. I've tagged the
> standard F-10 build package for olpc-4 in koji so if someone could
> update the build script for the new name it should be fixed.
Ah, I was wondering
Hi All,
Looking further at the issues with joyride in particular the
following 3 packages:
ntpdate
olpcsound
olpc-logos
Looking at the output of the pilgrim build logs [1] I see the following errors:
Setting up Install Process
Parsing package install arguments
No package olpc-logos availabl
26 matches
Mail list logo
