Hi All:
I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the
0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets as rpms. As this
discussion does not impact the UI and more of a packaging issue I'm an
not creating a Features page. The discussion can take place here on the
mailing-li
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the
> 0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets as rpms. As this
> discussion does not impact the UI and more of a packaging issue I'm an
> not creating a Features page.
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>> I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the
>> 0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets as rpms. As this
>> discussion does not impact the UI and more o
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>> I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the
>> 0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets as rpms. As this
>> discussion does not impact the UI and more o
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 00:20 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> >> I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the
> >> 0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 00:20 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>> >> I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in
On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 10:14 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 3:43 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > On Mon, 2012-07-30 at 00:20 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 4:42 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 7:51 PM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> >> >>
On 30 July 2012 23:26, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> The idea works well for users of Dextrose where OLPC-AU as a deployment
> could omit features that are still under development and not show the
> icon the control-panel at all. I'm not asking for anything to be
> removed, just packaged and made available
> We use yum to provide automatic updates to our XOs in the field, and
> we must be mindful that large RPMs can have an impact on the school's
> Internet connection. If 400 XOs need to download a ~800KB Sugar RPM,
> that's 320MB being downloaded, potentially at the same time.
Isn't there a cachein
For deployments that eschew servers, a caching proxy won't help. But
on the other hand, sharing the updates across a bunch of XOs might be
possible using a torrent-like implementation.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
wrote:
> On 30 July 2012 23:26, Jerry Vonau wrote:
>> The idea works well for users of Dextrose where OLPC-AU as a deployment
>> could omit features that are still under development and not show the
>> icon the control-panel at all. I'm not askin
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:04 AM, James Cameron wrote:
> For deployments that eschew servers, a caching proxy won't help. But
> on the other hand, sharing the updates across a bunch of XOs might be
> possible using a torrent-like implementation.
Facebook uses torrents to distribute their rpm and w
On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 09:53 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Sridhar Dhanapalan
> wrote:
> > On 30 July 2012 23:26, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> >> The idea works well for users of Dextrose where OLPC-AU as a deployment
> >> could omit features that are still under developme
On 2 August 2012 21:06, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-08-02 at 09:53 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Do you have any form of proxy? A local transparent proxy would mean
>> 400 XOs still only download 800Kb over the link. There's lots of ways
>> to skin a cat.
>>
>
> We have no control over the
> > We have no control over the network environment what so ever and need to
> > work within the confines of what is available.
>
> This is our primary constraint: we cannot install servers or proxies.
>
> Schools in remote areas have latent/slow/expensive Internet links.
> You'd think that a cac
On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 15:28 -0700, John Gilmore wrote:
> > > We have no control over the network environment what so ever and need to
> > > work within the confines of what is available.
> >
> > This is our primary constraint: we cannot install servers or proxies.
> >
> > Schools in remote areas
On 11 August 2012 08:28, John Gilmore wrote:
>> > We have no control over the network environment what so ever and need to
>> > work within the confines of what is available.
>>
>> This is our primary constraint: we cannot install servers or proxies.
>>
>> Schools in remote areas have latent/slow/
On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the
> 0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets as rpms. As this
> discussion does not impact the UI and more of a packaging issue I'm an
> not creating a Fea
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 21:29 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Jerry Vonau wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > I would like to propose a feature for discussion and inclusion in the
> > 0.98 cycle is packaging all control-panel applets as rpms. As this
> > discussion does not im
19 matches
Mail list logo
