Anyone out there using the opal_dss.release API? If not, I propose to get rid
of it. I can find no place in the current code that uses it, and don't see any
real reason why someone would do so.
Thanks
Ralph
Now fixed with r26631
On Jun 20, 2012, at 9:48 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
> On 06/19/12 23:11, Ralph Castain wrote:
>> Also, how did you configure this version?
> --enable-heterogeneous
> --enable-cxx-exceptions
> --enable-shared
> --enable-orterun-prefix-by-default
> --with-sge
> --enable-mpi-
On Jun 21, 2012, at 1:54 PM, Shamis, Pavel wrote:
> About naming - I would agree with Terry, it makes sense to name it after
> network API used for this btl - "verbs" (it is not obverts).
I don't think that "verbs" is terrible, but I think that "openfabrics" has more
user-level recognition.
Fo
On Jun 21, 2012, at 11:10 AM, Shamis, Pavel wrote:
> OpenIB BTL is the primary source cause for existence of the OOB UD component.
Err.. I'm confused. These are two unrelated things.
I.e., there's no reason to think that OOB and MPI transport/protocol types are
related. Indeed, we've been usi
BTW, if people want to rename openib btl to something else and then change the
configure scripts - I'm ok.
About naming - I would agree with Terry, it makes sense to name it after
network API used for this btl - "verbs" (it is not ibverbs).
Bottom line, I would recommend to keep configure option
> On Jun 20, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Shamis, Pavel wrote:
>
>> I hate it ...
>>
>> As far as I understand it is not reason to rename it. The OFED-lovin
>> components should look at $with_openib.
>
> Ah, sorry -- I didn't think this would be controversial.
It is not controversial. The "hate" was onl
On Jun 21, 2012, at 9:16 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> 2. Have consistent behavior between the configury of all OFED-lovin'
> components (currently the 4 I listed), per your description:
> * --with-openfabrics[=DIR] means that all OFED-lovin' components must
> configure successfully, or fail
> *
On Jun 21, 2012, at 9:06 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
> Ok, I think it is starting to sink in. the --with-openfabrics isn't
> declaring that one builds the openib btl but that the openfabrics stack is
> available to be used by any of the components that requires that stack (like
> the list above).
On 6/21/2012 8:52 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:40 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
So you specify --with-ofed and you get mca_btl_openib generated? ICK!!! I
think that will just make things more confusing. I am against this unless you
change the btl name.
We already have this si
On Jun 21, 2012, at 8:40 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
> So you specify --with-ofed and you get mca_btl_openib generated? ICK!!! I
> think that will just make things more confusing. I am against this unless
> you change the btl name.
We already have this situation. There are 4 components that use
On 6/21/2012 6:38 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jun 21, 2012, at 6:11 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
As far as I understand it is not reason to rename it. The OFED-lovin components
should look at $with_openib.
I agree with Pasha that the reason you give for renaming openib btl seem
orthogonal to re
SVN and Trac are back.
On Jun 21, 2012, at 7:17 AM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> We're investigating with IU.
>
> Sorry for the interruption, folks...
>
> --
> Jeff Squyres
> jsquy...@cisco.com
> For corporate legal information go to:
> http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
>
>
Got it! Will take a little thinking to fix - it's basically a conflict between
rollup and tree spawn. For now, you can run with:
-mca orte_use_common_port 0 -mca plm_rsh_no_tree_spawn 1
Sorry about that - thanks for letting me know!
Ralph
On Jun 20, 2012, at 9:48 PM, Eugene Loh wrote:
> On 06
We're investigating with IU.
Sorry for the interruption, folks...
--
Jeff Squyres
jsquy...@cisco.com
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/
On Jun 21, 2012, at 6:11 AM, TERRY DONTJE wrote:
>>> As far as I understand it is not reason to rename it. The OFED-lovin
>>> components should look at $with_openib.
>>>
> I agree with Pasha that the reason you give for renaming openib btl seem
> orthogonal to renaming the btl.
Note that I'm
On 6/20/2012 5:02 PM, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Jun 20, 2012, at 4:25 PM, Shamis, Pavel wrote:
I hate it ...
As far as I understand it is not reason to rename it. The OFED-lovin components
should look at $with_openib.
I agree with Pasha that the reason you give for renaming openib btl seem
or
16 matches
Mail list logo
