The pricing question might not be as simple as it first sounds. At
BitBucket Academic accounts are free and allow unlimited users. So, if
somebody with an .EDU email address (IU and UTK come to mind) are the
owners of the repo then I believe the cost is zero. Somebody should verify
that rather
my 0.02 US$ ...
Bitbucket pricing model is per user (but with free public/private
repository up to 5 users)
whereas github pricing is per *private* repository (and free public
repository and with unlimited users)
from an OpenMPI point of view, this means :
- with github, only the private ompi-tes
On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:52 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> I don't have experience with GerritHub, but Bitbucket supports this
> feature (permissions on branch names/globs) and we use it in PETSc.
Thanks for the info. Paul Hargrove said pretty much the same thing to me,
off-list.
I'll check it out.
--
"Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" writes:
> GerritHub claims to allow us to effectively have ACLs on branches.
> I.e., everyone could commit on master, but only release managers can
> commit on release branches. This would be nice, and would allow us to
> avoid having the 2 repos, like we're currently pl
At just about at the last minute, a new contender showed up: GerritHub.io.
GerritHub claims to allow us to effectively have ACLs on branches. I.e.,
everyone could commit on master, but only release managers can commit on
release branches. This would be nice, and would allow us to avoid having
Sorry for the delay in response, somehow I missed this.
Those were SVN IDs. I have created a github id (vvenkatesan)
vvenkates is the currently active SVN ID. So
vvenkates -> vvenkatesan
Thanks
Vish
On Sep 18, 2014, at 10:58 AM, "Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)"
wrote:
On Sep 18, 2014, at 11:35 A
REMINDER: The conversion of Open MPI's Subversion repository and Trac tickets
will be happening tomorrow, Wednesday, September 24, 2014.
SVN and Trac will be going read-only at 8am US Eastern tomorrow, and the
conversion process will begin. I anticipate it taking all day.
I'll send an "all cle
Rolf -- please add this to the agenda for today.
On Sep 23, 2014, at 10:28 AM, Ralph Castain wrote:
> ofacm needs to be updated to remove xoob and oob modules as those cannot be
> used from the opal layer
>
>
> On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)
> wrote:
>
>> From SVN tru
ofacm needs to be updated to remove xoob and oob modules as those cannot be
used from the opal layer
On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:22 AM, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote:
> From SVN trunk HEAD (r32772):
>
> -
> mca/btl/ugni/btl_ugni_component.c
> 20:#include "ompi/runtime/params.h"
>
> mca/btl/usn
>From SVN trunk HEAD (r32772):
-
mca/btl/ugni/btl_ugni_component.c
20:#include "ompi/runtime/params.h"
mca/btl/usnic/btl_usnic_compat.h
43:# include "ompi/mca/rte/rte.h"
--> This is ok; it is protected in a #if (just to make diffs to v1.8 easier)
mca/common/ofacm/common_ofacm_xoob.c
26:#inc
Thanks! I won't have time to work on it this week, but appreciate your effort.
Also, thanks for clarifying the race condition vis 1.8 - I agree it is not a
blocker for that release.
Ralph
On Sep 22, 2014, at 4:49 PM, Gilles Gouaillardet
wrote:
> Ralph,
>
> here is the patch i am using so fa
11 matches
Mail list logo
