Re: [OMPI devel] [EXTERNAL] Git submodules are coming

2020-01-08 Thread Thomas Naughton via devel
mix4x/openpmix (v1.1.3-2128-gb94e261) 52d498811f19be5306bd55b8433024733d3b589a prrte (dev-30165-g52d4988) beaker:$ --tjn _____ Thomas Naughton naught...@ornl.gov Research Asso

Re: [OMPI devel] Remove prun tool from OMPI?

2018-06-05 Thread Thomas Naughton
On Tue, 5 Jun 2018, r...@open-mpi.org wrote: On Jun 5, 2018, at 11:59 AM, Thomas Naughton wrote: Hi Ralph, All it means is that PRRTE users must be careful to have PRRTE before OMPI in their path values. Otherwise, they get the wrong “prun” and it fails. I suppose I could update the

Re: [OMPI devel] Remove prun tool from OMPI?

2018-06-05 Thread Thomas Naughton
hat falls out in future (based on discussion on call today). I guess the main point of interest would be to have some method for launching the DVM scenario with OMPI. Another option could be to rename the binary in OMPI? Thanks, --tjn _____

Re: [OMPI devel] Remove prun tool from OMPI?

2018-06-05 Thread Thomas Naughton
Hi Ralph, Is the 'prun' tool required to launch the DVM? I know that at some point things shifted to use 'prun' and didn't require the URI on command-line, but I've not tested in few months. Thanks, --tjn ____

Re: [OMPI devel] Q: Using a hostfile in managed environment?

2017-02-24 Thread Thomas Naughton
nks, --tjn _____ Thomas Naughton naught...@ornl.gov Research Associate (865) 576-4184 On Fri, 24 Feb 2017, r...@open-mpi.org wrote: On Feb 24, 2017, at 11:57 AM, Thomas Naughton wrote: Hi, We're trying to track do

[OMPI devel] Q: Using a hostfile in managed environment?

2017-02-24 Thread Thomas Naughton
a flawed assumption? Thanks, --tjn _____ Thomas Naughton naught...@ornl.gov Research Associate (865) 576-4184 ___ devel mailing

Re: [OMPI devel] Need to know your Github ID

2014-09-11 Thread Thomas Naughton
naughtont -> naughtont3 Thanks, --tjn _ Thomas Naughton naught...@ornl.gov Research Associate (865) 576-4184 On Wed, 10 Sep 2014, Jeff Squy

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: add STCI component to OMPI/RTE framework

2014-05-29 Thread Thomas Naughton
_ Thomas Naughton naught...@ornl.gov Research Associate (865) 576-4184 On Thu, 29 May 2014, Jeff Squyres (jsquyres) wrote: I refrained from speaking up on this thread because I was

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: add STCI component to OMPI/RTE framework

2014-05-27 Thread Thomas Naughton
Sure, if its helpful I can join a call. --tjn _ Thomas Naughton naught...@ornl.gov Research Associate (865) 576-4184 On Tue, 27 May 2014, Ralph

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: add STCI component to OMPI/RTE framework

2014-05-27 Thread Thomas Naughton
Inline comments ... way at the bottom. ;-) --tjn _ Thomas Naughton naught...@ornl.gov Research Associate (865) 576-4184 On Tue, 27 May 2014

[OMPI devel] RFC: add STCI component to OMPI/RTE framework

2014-05-27 Thread Thomas Naughton
will also provide an alternate component to ORTE, which was motivation for PMI component in related RFC. We build/test nightly and it occasionally catches ompi-rte abstraction violations, etc. Thomas _ Thomas Naug

Re: [OMPI devel] RFC: remove PMI component in OMPI/RTE framework

2014-05-27 Thread Thomas Naughton
Hi Ralph, This component does provide a alternate reference for the ompi-rte framework. But if it is unused (unmaintained), it seems less useful in practice. I'll post another RFC for related request. --tjn _____ T

Re: [OMPI devel] yesterday commits caused a crash in helloworld with --mca btl tcp, self

2014-05-16 Thread Thomas Naughton
ved" */ (gdb) p array->arr_size $4 = 69 (gdb) p array->bml_btls $5 = (mca_bml_base_btl_t *) 0x0 Anyone else seeing problems? --tjn _________ Thomas Naughton naught...@ornl.gov Researc

Re: [OMPI devel] Q: MPI-RTE / ompi_proc_t vs. ompi_process_info_t ?

2013-12-18 Thread Thomas Naughton
Hi Ralph, OK, thanks for clarification and code pointers. I'll update "rte.h" to reflect the updates. Thanks, --tjn _____ Thomas Naughton naught...@ornl.gov Res

[OMPI devel] Q: MPI-RTE / ompi_proc_t vs. ompi_process_info_t ?

2013-12-18 Thread Thomas Naughton
;rte.h" file? I understand the general motivation for the API change but it is less clear to me how the information previously defined in the header changes (or does not change)? Thanks, --tjn _________ Thomas Naughto

Re: [OMPI devel] ROMIO update breaks trunk

2013-11-14 Thread Thomas Naughton
Hi Ralph, Does the version in AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE in configure.ac also need to be increased? It currently shows 1.11. Thanks, --tjn _ Thomas Naughton naught...@ornl.gov Research

[OMPI devel] 'install-sh' in SVN

2013-06-07 Thread Thomas Naughton
Hi, It looks like an auto-generated 'install-sh' was accidentally added to SVN under libevent in OPAL: ompi-trunk/opal/mca/event/libevent2021/libevent/install-sh Ok, to remove it? --tjn _____ Thoma

Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn] svn:open-mpi r28456 - trunk

2013-05-08 Thread Thomas Naughton
est with the earlier version of autogen.pl (r28241) and it does indeed generate the Makefiles for that directory. So it does seem reasonable that if autogen.pl processes the directory for Makefile stuff*, that it should process it for the "frameworks.h" entry. I'll revert that part of th

Re: [OMPI devel] Q: project based MCA param files

2013-05-07 Thread Thomas Naughton
? Or does it replace/override the default? Thanks Jeff for forwarding info to devel list to get broader feedback, and to Ralph for providing the suggestion. --tjn _ Thomas Naughton naught

Re: [OMPI devel] [OMPI svn] svn:open-mpi r28456 - trunk

2013-05-07 Thread Thomas Naughton
conf'. This again is a "do no harm" factor to support pre-exising functionality. If you have a "${project}/config/" directory. This appends the "-I ${project}/config/" to the autoreconf list. If you do not have a "${project}/config/"