If someone with a .edu account gets us a free Bitbucket for Open MPI, and then
we use it for both research and industry stuff... at best, I think that falls
into a grey area as to whether this is within Bitbucket's TOS (disclaimer: I
haven't read their TOS). It still sounds like a murky prospec
The pricing question might not be as simple as it first sounds. At
BitBucket Academic accounts are free and allow unlimited users. So, if
somebody with an .EDU email address (IU and UTK come to mind) are the
owners of the repo then I believe the cost is zero. Somebody should verify
that rather
my 0.02 US$ ...
Bitbucket pricing model is per user (but with free public/private
repository up to 5 users)
whereas github pricing is per *private* repository (and free public
repository and with unlimited users)
from an OpenMPI point of view, this means :
- with github, only the private ompi-tes
On Sep 23, 2014, at 7:52 PM, Jed Brown wrote:
> I don't have experience with GerritHub, but Bitbucket supports this
> feature (permissions on branch names/globs) and we use it in PETSc.
Thanks for the info. Paul Hargrove said pretty much the same thing to me,
off-list.
I'll check it out.
--
"Jeff Squyres (jsquyres)" writes:
> GerritHub claims to allow us to effectively have ACLs on branches.
> I.e., everyone could commit on master, but only release managers can
> commit on release branches. This would be nice, and would allow us to
> avoid having the 2 repos, like we're currently pl
At just about at the last minute, a new contender showed up: GerritHub.io.
GerritHub claims to allow us to effectively have ACLs on branches. I.e.,
everyone could commit on master, but only release managers can commit on
release branches. This would be nice, and would allow us to avoid having
