ull source should just result in a returning play() method...
>
> the source of the audio element:
> https://github.com/yoktobit/morzyn/blob/master/qml/MorzynPage.qml
>
> Thanks
> Martin
>
> > Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:29:31 +0200
> > From: reto.zi...@jolla.com
>
nion,
playing a null source should just result in a returning play() method...
the source of the audio element:
https://github.com/yoktobit/morzyn/blob/master/qml/MorzynPage.qml
Thanks
Martin
> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 15:29:31 +0200
> From: reto.zi...@jolla.com
> To: devel@lists
t; From: reto.zi...@jolla.com
> To: devel@lists.sailfishos.org
> Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour QA process...
>
> Hi,
>
> On 10.01.2014 11:01, Martin Windolph wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > another point for me is a possibility to contact the tester.
> > A prior rej
th the version in store.
Martin
> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:57:50 +0100
> From: a...@mecadu.org
> To: devel@lists.sailfishos.org
> Subject: [SailfishDevel] Harbour QA process...
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi,
>
> currently, the
t profit from the fixes of the
> update and have to deal with the version in store.
>
> Martin
>
>> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:57:50 +0100
>> From: a...@mecadu.org
>> To: devel@lists.sailfishos.org
>> Subject: [SailfishDevel] Harbour QA process...
>>
Just great to hear. ;-)
--
Von meinem Nokia N9 gesendet
Andrey Kozhevnikov schrieb am 10.01.14 12:23:
I can assure you that the author is aware of Harbour ;)
On 10.01.2014 17:17, Benoît HERVIER wrote:
Indeed, we should suggest it to his author. But that s a beta, i didn't
think he want t
I can assure you that the author is aware of Harbour ;)
On 10.01.2014 17:17, Benoît HERVIER wrote:
Indeed, we should suggest it to his author. But that s a beta, i
didn't think he want to push it now.
Regards,
---
Benoît HERVIER - http://khertan.net/
Le 2014-01-10 12:06, Gabriel Böhme a éc
Indeed, we should suggest it to his author. But that s a beta, i didn't
think he want to push it now.
Regards,
---
Benoît HERVIER - http://khertan.net/
Le 2014-01-10 12:06, Gabriel Böhme a écrit :
> What about pushing the WareHouse app to Jolla Store?! So everyone can find
> it. :)
>
>
What about pushing the WareHouse app to Jolla Store?! So everyone can find
it. :)
Don't know if possible, just an idea.
--
Von meinem Nokia N9 gesendet
Benoît HERVIER schrieb am 10.01.14 11:53:
Hi all !
I'm also waiting that using python interpreter as a dependancy are accepted
in Harbo
Hi all !
I'm also waiting that using python interpreter as a dependancy are
accepted in Harbour.
Also some tips suggest that s will be Python 3 ... but SailfishOS still
have py2.7.
While i'm waiting to submit them to harbour, some of my Apps are already
running on my device, and some are alr
Thanks for the support :)
I will develop QSpot for SailfishOS, timetable however depends on when
certain libs will be whitelisted / allowed. I could also consider
publishing an alpha for testing somewhere else. I hope that the QA
process will be improved and eased, and possible more automation
the fixes of the update and have to deal
with the version in store.
Martin
> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2014 08:57:50 +0100
> From: a...@mecadu.org
> To: devel@lists.sailfishos.org
> Subject: [SailfishDevel] Harbour QA process...
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash:
2014/1/10 Ruediger Gad :
> On 01/10/2014 09:32 AM, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
>> 2014/1/10 Andreas Enbacka :
>>> I would like to agree with Franck on this. I have also partly held off
>>> developing for SailfishOS due to e.g., the Harbour process, as well as due
>>> to APIs my apps need to are not allowe
Hi,
thanks, yeah, Kontio also commented on this and closed the request.
I actually searched before posting but didn't find that one.
Thanks again.
BR,
Ruediger
On 01/10/2014 09:45 AM, Reto Zingg wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10.01.2014 10:36, Ruediger Gad wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I agree as well.
>> Hav
Hi,
On 10.01.2014 10:36, Ruediger Gad wrote:
Hi,
I agree as well.
Having a quicker way to check at least simple requirements would greatly
improve the developer experience as well as the work of the testers at
Harbour.
I filed a request about this at together.jolla.com:
https://together.jolla.c
On 01/10/2014 09:32 AM, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
> 2014/1/10 Andreas Enbacka :
>> I would like to agree with Franck on this. I have also partly held off
>> developing for SailfishOS due to e.g., the Harbour process, as well as due
>> to APIs my apps need to are not allowed.
>
> This seems backwards; i
That's right!
You can get your app into eg. openrepos.net, and there is a store app now
for Sailfish too: https://openrepos.net/content/basil/warehouse
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Kalle Vahlman wrote:
> 2014/1/10 Andreas Enbacka :
> > I would like to agree with Franck on this. I have also
Hi,
I agree as well.
Having a quicker way to check at least simple requirements would greatly
improve the developer experience as well as the work of the testers at
Harbour.
I filed a request about this at together.jolla.com:
https://together.jolla.com/question/13023/harbour-toolautomatism-for-qui
2014/1/10 Andreas Enbacka :
> I would like to agree with Franck on this. I have also partly held off
> developing for SailfishOS due to e.g., the Harbour process, as well as due
> to APIs my apps need to are not allowed.
This seems backwards; if no cool apps exist for SailfishOS that use
certain A
I would like to agree with Franck on this. I have also partly held off
developing for SailfishOS due to e.g., the Harbour process, as well as
due to APIs my apps need to are not allowed. I think that in case Jolla
wants developers to focus on developing native apps for SailfishOS, many
improvme
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
currently, the Harbour QA process is quite frustrating, as problems
are reported one after the other, with a delay of several days
inbetween... reminds me of the old time cobol compilators!
It would be cool if the efforts made by the developper t
21 matches
Mail list logo
