I'd love to have such handling also in our rpm build..
we started some work in https://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/42491 , lets try to
align the handling in both debian and fedora packaging.
feel free to post a patch for that as well and I promise to push it forward
On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Mila
Nir Soffer writes:
> Note that safeelase requires several packages which are *not* required
> for safelease, but for vdsm.
>
> Currently vdsm is noarch rpm, so it cannot require arch specific packages.
> since it requires safelease, we added arch specific packages to safelease.
Thank you for mak
On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 10:05 AM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:08:16PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Piotr Kliczewski
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> >> I work on inclusion of Vdsm into Debian. I don't
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 12:08:16PM +0200, Nir Soffer wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Piotr Kliczewski
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> >> I work on inclusion of Vdsm into Debian. I don't know what are the
> >> reasons for having separate `infra', `x
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 5:52 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> Yaniv Bronheim writes:
>
>> If in debian we will have different set of rpms for vdsm, can you
>> please also add section about how to build and install vdsm over
>> debian in https://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers ?
>
> Sure, I'm going to upd
Yaniv Bronheim writes:
> If in debian we will have different set of rpms for vdsm, can you
> please also add section about how to build and install vdsm over
> debian in https://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers ?
Sure, I'm going to update Debian information on Wiki (as well as to
announce it on the
If in debian we will have different set of rpms for vdsm, can you please
also add section about how to build and install vdsm over debian in
https://www.ovirt.org/Vdsm_Developers ?
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:34 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> Thank you for clarification. So as for Debian, I'll create
Thank you for clarification. So as for Debian, I'll create vdsm-api
package (after 3.6) and I won't separate the other mentioned packages
from vdsm-python.
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@ovirt.org
http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Piotr Kliczewski
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote:
>> I work on inclusion of Vdsm into Debian. I don't know what are the
>> reasons for having separate `infra', `xmlrpc', `yajsonrpc', and
>> `jsonrpc' packages.
>>
>
> - infra package
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:02 PM, Milan Zamazal wrote:
> I work on inclusion of Vdsm into Debian. I don't know what are the
> reasons for having separate `infra', `xmlrpc', `yajsonrpc', and
> `jsonrpc' packages.
>
- infra package contains infra related modules like zombiereaper,
sygutils (core in
I work on inclusion of Vdsm into Debian. I don't know what are the
reasons for having separate `infra', `xmlrpc', `yajsonrpc', and
`jsonrpc' packages.
Could you please provide rationale for having each of those packages,
separated from `vdsm' and `vdsm-python'? I need to put proper
explanations
11 matches
Mail list logo
