Re: [riot-devel] Network Stack Task Force

2015-02-06 Thread Martine Lenders
Hello Martin, 2015-02-06 9:02 GMT+01:00 Martin martin.landsm...@haw-hamburg.de: thx again for recording the audio for the introducing presentation. It was a great help to get a more descend look at the information from the slides and the idea for the message based network stack approach.

Re: [riot-devel] Network Stack Task Force

2015-02-06 Thread Martin
Hi, thx again for recording the audio for the introducing presentation. It was a great help to get a more descend look at the information from the slides and the idea for the message based network stack approach. Yesterday we got the foundamental concept how the new network stack will

Re: [riot-devel] Call for OTA (Over the Air Update) Task Force

2015-02-06 Thread Arvid Picciani
Thanks everyone for the input so far, it looks like there is a decent agreement on some core concepts, and there is a strong interest to contribute them. I would like to propose to continue with a virtual meeting, to: - present a summary(!) of the use cases and requirements posted on the ML -

Re: [riot-devel] Network Stack Task Force

2015-02-06 Thread Hauke Petersen
Good Morning again, we will continue with the network stack soon. If you want to join remotely, here is the PlaceCam link: http://placecam.de/call.php?c=0~dA5j0OrfTdsesyQKlqIZvQi7bo1YKYGdMORGFmqL8- http://placecam.de/call.php?c=0%7EdA5j0OrfTdsesyQKlqIZvQi7bo1YKYGdMORGFmqL8- How-To use it?

Re: [riot-devel] 'defalut' example on SAMR21 Xplained Pro

2015-02-06 Thread Ludwig Ortmann
Hi, Please try connecting to a different USB port, I've seen this before. Cheers, Ludwig Am 6. Februar 2015 11:42:05 MEZ, schrieb ROUSSEL Kévin kevin.rous...@inria.fr: Hello everyone, Does the 'default' example work correctly on SAMR21 Xplained Pro? I compiled and flashed successfully this

[riot-devel] 'defalut' example on SAMR21 Xplained Pro

2015-02-06 Thread ROUSSEL Kévin
Hello everyone, Does the 'default' example work correctly on SAMR21 Xplained Pro? I compiled and flashed successfully this application on the Xplained Pro I have; but when doing 'make term', I just can't obtain any output from the board (via the same debug USB port I used to flash). Was

Re: [riot-devel] How low can you go?

2015-02-06 Thread Joakim Gebart
On Fri, Feb 6, 2015 at 10:10 AM, Thomas Eichinger thomas.eichin...@fu-berlin.de wrote: Hi, On 06 Feb 2015, at 09:36, Ludwig Ortmann ludwig.ortm...@fu-berlin.de wrote: Hi, On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 09:03:31AM +0100, Oleg Hahm wrote: Am Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:09:52PM -0800 schrieb Adam Hunt:

Re: [riot-devel] How low can you go?

2015-02-06 Thread Thomas Eichinger
Hi, On 06 Feb 2015, at 09:36, Ludwig Ortmann ludwig.ortm...@fu-berlin.de wrote: Hi, On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 09:03:31AM +0100, Oleg Hahm wrote: Am Thu, Feb 05, 2015 at 02:09:52PM -0800 schrieb Adam Hunt: There's already a driver for for Atmel's AT86RF231 in the tree and while the

Re: [riot-devel] Problem socket UDP

2015-02-06 Thread Ludwig Ortmann
Hi Baptiste, could you open an issue please? Cheers, Ludwig On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 03:05:05PM +0100, Baptiste Clenet wrote: After pluging a second sender, I got the problem: if ((socket MAX_SOCKETS) || (socket_base_sockets[socket - 1].socket_id == 0)) { return false; }

Re: [riot-devel] Problem socket UDP

2015-02-06 Thread Baptiste Clenet
Here is the backtrace bt #0 isr_hard_fault () at RIOT/cpu/samd21/startup.c:104 #1 signal handler called #2 0x06ec in clist_advance (list=0x20001c30 sched_runqueues) at RIOT/core/include/clist.h:80 #3 0x08d4 in thread_yield () at RIOT/core/thread.c:99 #4 0x000167fe in isr_eic () at

Re: [riot-devel] Problem socket UDP

2015-02-06 Thread Baptiste Clenet
Yes sure 2015-02-06 15:07 GMT+01:00 Ludwig Ortmann ludwig.ortm...@fu-berlin.de: Hi Baptiste, could you open an issue please? Cheers, Ludwig On Fri, Feb 06, 2015 at 03:05:05PM +0100, Baptiste Clenet wrote: After pluging a second sender, I got the problem: if ((socket MAX_SOCKETS)

Re: [riot-devel] Problem socket UDP

2015-02-06 Thread Baptiste Clenet
I have let my program running with two boards: one sender and one receiver. It seems to work for the moment (longer than with three sender boards) 2015-02-06 10:53 GMT+01:00 Baptiste Clenet bapcle...@gmail.com: Hi Oleg, I tried on native by simulating the value from sensor and it works after