Re: [riot-devel] Mailserver issues

dt wrote: >> Hello. >> >> On 08/11/2017 02:03 PM, Oleg Hahm wrote: >>> Hey Adam! >>> >>> Thanks for the pointer. That's definitely something we should consider. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Oleg >>> >>> On Fri, Aug 11, 20

Re: [riot-devel] Mailserver issues

, 2017 at 04:04:05AM -0700, Adam Hunt wrote: >> Just out of curiosity, was this due to a lack of machine resources? > > Actually not. In fact, the maximum number of MTA and content filter processes > were configured too low. > >> How is RIOT's infrastructure (e.g. web and m

Re: [riot-devel] Mailserver issues

Just out of curiosity, was this due to a lack of machine resources? How is RIOT's infrastructure (e.g. web and mail hosting) handled; is the hosting donated by one or more of the supporters listed at the bottom of the project's homepage? Would additional hosting resources be helpful? --adam On

[riot-devel] Porting to the ARTIK 030 module

Has anyone taken a look at the ARTIK 030 module from Samsung? It's a Cortex-M4 based (SiLabs EFR32MG1 SoC) module with 256 kB flash and 32 kB SRAM, a cryto processor, and 802.15.4 radio. In the US they're available from Digikey and Mouser for $7.30 in single unit quantities; I'm not sure who

[riot-devel] Helping out with the CI situation

With all the chatter about the CI situation lately I got to wondering if there might be some way I could help out. It sound like Kaspar has things under control with the new CI system but what about builders; are there enough CPU cycles available for the current rate of RIOT development, what

[riot-devel] 5 Open Source IoT Projects to Watch in 2016

I'm not sure if anyone saw this. Check slide #3. https://blog.benjamin-cabe.com/2016/02/08/5-open-source-iot-projects-to-watch-in-2016 ___ devel mailing list devel@riot-os.org https://lists.riot-os.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: [riot-devel] TI CC1310 and CC2650

s for development, just contact me direclty. > > We will be in Nuremberg at the SPS IPC Drives by next week (24.11.-26.11; > Hall 6, Booth 449), so if you are nearby visit us there. > > Best > Jonas > > -"devel" <devel-boun...@riot-os.org> schrieb: -

Re: [riot-devel] TI CC1310 and CC2650

i > so I will be loading RIOT and see what is required in terms of porting > > TI suggested that I wait for version 2 of the silicon of the CC1350 It > should have been release end of Q3 of this year, I'm still waiting.. > The TI rep will be here today I hope .. > > Any

[riot-devel] TI CC1310 and CC2650

Has anyone taken a look at TI's CC2560 or C1310 processors? They're both based on an a Cortex-M3 processor clocked up to 48 MHz and work in the 2.4 GHz and sub-1 GHz bands respectively. I haven't had a chance to read all the documentation yet but they appear similar to the CC2538, aside from one

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT Release 2015.09

Great work! On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 2:50 PM Matthias Waehlisch wrote: > +1 > > and spread the word that RIOT improves, step by step by the community. > > > Cheers > matthias > > On Mon, 5 Oct 2015, Emmanuel Baccelli wrote: > > > And thank you Oleg for driving "the

Re: [riot-devel] is the msp430 still supported?

When you say MSP430 does that include the CC430 that has the integrated CC1101? How similar is the CC430 compared to a MSP430 and CC1101? Are they 100% compatible? On Sat, Sep 5, 2015 at 1:42 AM Kaspar Schleiser wrote: > Hey, > > On 09/05/15 09:16, Eric Decker wrote: > > or

Re: [riot-devel] HotSpot JVM on RIOT-OS?

While I applaud the idea of getting something as heavyweight as a JVM to run on the type of devices that most of us on this list are targeting have you thought about non-JVM languages? I've often wondered how small of a system Erlang could be persuaded to running on. On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:47

Re: [riot-devel] OTA update

A BSDish license with the addition of a poison pill. Too bad. Though, while I'm certainly not a lawyer of any type I wonder about the possibility/legality of basing future works off the code without violating the license. Another option would be to simply ask the powers that be at Atmel to

Re: [riot-devel] OTA update

What license have they released their code under? I'd look myself but I'm away from my desk. Adam On Tue, Jun 16, 2015, 7:41 AM Baptiste Clenet bapcle...@gmail.com wrote: Those example are provided with the last version of Atmel Studio (which is free). See here [1], the two examples: -

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT - mac80211

I forgot to mention, these days most wifi devices are softmac based. Examples of fullmac drivers are Atheros' AR600x (ath6kl), and Marvel's libertas USB and SDIO devices. On Wed, May 27, 2015, 1:21 PM Adam Hunt voxa...@gmail.com wrote: Unfortunately, I haven't been able to keep up on all

Re: [riot-devel] Association time in mobile RPL/6lowpan networks

. I also thought about reseting the trickle timer from userspace to enforce DIOs. +1 for this. It would be nice to have some shell commands to call these functions too. Best regards, /Joakim Cheers, Cenk On 21.05.2015 04:36, Adam Hunt wrote: That's great. Is there any way

Re: [riot-devel] Switch to BSD?

I'd be willing to bet that GNU Classpath is one of the oldest projects licensed under the GPL with a linking exception. Classpath is distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License with the following clarification and special exception. Linking this library statically or

Re: [riot-devel] Nordic's 6LoWPAN over Bluetooth Low Energy

While I can think of a few good uses for this chip I'm still not sold on BLE being a good thing for the Internet of Things. Historically, the Bluetooth SIG has been less than open. Does anyone remember the SIG having BlueZ's site (maybe it was just a mailing list) taken down back in about

Re: [riot-devel] MIPS platform (PIC32)

hardware specific things ?. I am new to RIOT that is why I ask. Is there a good ducument about the inner workings of RIOY OS so I can see if there are possible issues with MIPS. Paul. Adam Hunt voxa...@gmail.com schreef: Is there anything special about the MIPS march that would make porting

Re: [riot-devel] MIPS platform (PIC32)

Though, if you ask me, RIOT's code is far cleaner and more approachable than that of some other projects. On Tue Jan 13 2015 at 3:15:56 PM Martine Lenders authmille...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, 2015-01-14 0:10 GMT+01:00 Adam Hunt voxa...@gmail.com: […] Aside from those you should take a look

Re: [riot-devel] new iot hardware from intel: curie

Interesting, I'd love a little more information on the open source RTOS. I'd also like to a see hardware with a 15.4 capable radio. BLE *may* have its place but as it stands now, without CSR mesh solutions being embraced it's not as an appropriate a solution as 6lowpan over 15.4 for many

[riot-devel] Searchable devel@riot-os.org archive

available via the NNTP for those that prefer it (or even remember it). I've also requested that the user list be archived there and for the older messages be added to the archive but the request hasn't yet been completed (likely because no messages have been posted since 2014.12.18). Adam Hunt

Re: [riot-devel] Switch to BSD?

At risk of further confusing things maybe there's a happy medium between a strong copyleft/(L)GPL and a the BSD license. While I'm most certainly not a lawyer, copyright or otherwise, a quick look at the Eclipse Public License https://eclipse.org/org/documents/epl-v10.php (EPL) and the related

Re: [riot-devel] Switch to BSD?

that I must attend to and Monday is near a close. Adam Hunt On Mon Dec 08 2014 at 1:49:32 PM Johann Fischer johann_fisc...@posteo.de wrote: Hello RIOTers, Emmanuel Baccelli emmanuel.bacce...@inria.fr wrote: we have been receiving an increasing amount of negative feedback from various

Re: [riot-devel] Refectoring the network stack

that's being done. On Thu Nov 06 2014 at 10:24:24 AM Martine Lenders authmille...@gmail.com wrote: Am 06.11.2014 18:56 schrieb Adam Hunt voxa...@gmail.com: I'm sorry, somehow I missed the point where you mentioned 802.15.4e. Feel free to ignore me. After last night I shouldn't be allowed

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT/OpenWSN and TSCH support

I'd love to attend IETF93 if for no other reason than I have yet to get myself to Prague. Unfortunately, I don't think I'll be about to swing the US$1200 in airfare plus accommodations. I really need to find myself some wealthy benefactor interested in WSN research. On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:27

Re: [riot-devel] RIOT/OpenWSN and TSCH support

What are the chances that there will be video of this talk available for those of us who aren't so fortunate to live in the vicinity of IoT-Lab? On Thu Nov 06 2014 at 11:36:53 AM Oleg Hahm oliver.h...@inria.fr wrote: Hey Thomas! Happy to mention RIOT, I didn't know you were there :-) Yes,