[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course, there are such advantages to using bugzilla, but the above listed
steps are a lot more overhead for submission of trivial patches than
cvs diff foo.c | mail -s Trivial patch to foo [EMAIL
Owen Taylor writes:
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 14:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't the number of patches where you don't want:
- An explanation of what is wrong
- A bug number to be ability to refer to the change later
- The ability to add further comments to the bug report
David Dawes writes:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:56:49AM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
David Dawes writes:
The submission process is to go to bugs.xfree86.org. If people want
their submissions to be seen, that's where they should go. That's the
clearest explanation of the
Emmanuel writes:
So in short : where the trivial fixes (more or less like the janitor
ones) should be submitted (for now they are submitted via bugzilla)?
Thanks
Yes.
1. Please create yourself a bugzilla account and log in.
2. You can then use the 'create' function to
Emmanuel writes:
Thanks for the clarity. I have done it as you said already, I will
insist on the mime type for attachments on the janitor page.
OK, thanks.
Just one more thing : the patches I have submitted are trivial (minor
mem leaks, clean-ups, and only one more severe bug) but
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course, there are such advantages to using bugzilla, but the above listed
steps are a lot more overhead for submission of trivial patches than
cvs diff foo.c | mail -s Trivial patch to foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a very short patch like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Of course, there are such advantages to using bugzilla, but the above listed
steps are a lot more overhead for submission of trivial patches than
cvs diff foo.c | mail -s Trivial patch to foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a very short patch like this:
On Wed, 4 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, since Marc committed that small patch embedded in my last message, well
under an hour after I sent it, it seems this list is a very efficient email
interface to the XFree86 patch submission system ;^)
Tee hee.
Marc.
On Wed, 2003-06-04 at 14:59, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course, there are such advantages to using bugzilla, but the above listed
steps are a lot more overhead for submission of trivial patches than
cvs diff foo.c | mail -s Trivial patch to foo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For a very short
David Dawes writes:
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 03:49:46PM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail address still works?
Yes.
It works in the sense that email sent to it is accepted and doesn't
bounce. It is
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:29:04PM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
David Dawes writes:
On Sat, May 17, 2003 at 03:49:46PM -0600, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Thu, 15 May 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:
The [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail address still works?
Yes.
It works in the sense that
David Dawes writes:
The submission process is to go to bugs.xfree86.org. If people want
their submissions to be seen, that's where they should go. That's the
clearest explanation of the submission system that I can come up with.
Submissions sent elsewhere may or may not be seen.
12 matches
Mail list logo
