I think we're agreeing loudly - as I said, I have concerns about the
implications of allowing it to be configurable, but if we did, we
should probably blacklist overriding any hardcoded defines.
Not allowing that also resolves that problem.
- Rich
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 10:08 PM Josh Paetzel w
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019, at 6:32 PM, Rich wrote:
> I'm not usually in favor of limiting configurability, but in this
> case, I agree with Joshua - letting people add their own custom
> defines for e.g. debian-buster or epel6 or ubuntu1604 might be fine
> (though at that point I'd still like somethi
I'm not usually in favor of limiting configurability, but in this
case, I agree with Joshua - letting people add their own custom
defines for e.g. debian-buster or epel6 or ubuntu1604 might be fine
(though at that point I'd still like something like a constraint
solver to say "I want this to work o
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 10:53, Gregor Kopka
wrote:
> Looks good.
>
> Only thing: please make this feature lookup the features for a set from a
> plain text file (like in /etc/zfs/), just containing
> features_name = comma, separated, list, of, feature, names
> and not something compiled in.
> It s
On 3/25/19 3:52 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> The distros can lag arbitrarily far behind, and we have no control over
> them.
They can lag arbitrarily far behind in theory, but in practice the lag
will be bounded.
If one of the "tier 1" distros stops updating their ZFS packaging in a
timely manner,
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 1:43 PM Richard Laager wrote:
> On 3/25/19 8:15 AM, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> > "-o features=portable" means that features that are currently supported
> by all tier-1 platforms. This definition will change over time.
> Specifically, as of the current date, the following all
On 3/25/19 8:15 AM, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> Portability of boot pools is currently not a consideration.
Dealing with this for boot pools is a serious and timely concern of
mine. I use Ubuntu, which uses GRUB. It is clear that, in practice, GRUB
is not going to be kept up-to-date with new OpenZFS fea
On 3/25/19 8:15 AM, Josh Paetzel wrote:
> "-o features=portable" means that features that are currently supported by
> all tier-1 platforms. This definition will change over time. Specifically,
> as of the current date, the following all supported the features:
>- a numbered release of Free
First, let me say I'm so pleased someone actually drove this forward,
thank you. :)
I think my only lament about this would be the lack of zpool create
defaults, but that's a conversation for once everyone is confident
this doesn't cook your pool somehow.
- Rich
On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 9:16 AM J
Looks good.
Only thing: *please* make this feature lookup the features for a set *from a
plain text file* (like in /etc/zfs/), just containing
features_name = comma, separated, list, of, feature, names
and *not* something compiled in.
It should be easy to define custom feature sets, this would
This email is a summarization of the current proposal for easing the task of
creating OS portable pools with zpool create. There's been a ton of discussion
around this feature and we wanted to summarize the current discussion in
preparation for tomorrow's meeting:
Add new options to "zpool cre
11 matches
Mail list logo
