Op 14-12-2012 8:45, Bache-Wiig Jens schreef:
> I have been lurking in the discussion a bit but I guess it is time for me to
> pitch in. It is hard to keep up with 10 different threads at once. :)
>
> I find the idea of adding a new QCoreAction base class that is shared between
> QML Action and QA
On 12/18/2012 06:46 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
[...]
> C) QGuiAction is added to Gui and is used to create the QML API and
> the bridge with QActions.
[...]
>
> My favorite of those is C), but there is the unresolved question of
> how to make an effective bridge given that we can no longer make
> QActi
On Tuesday 18 December 2012 23:43:59 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 23.19.50, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > On Tuesday 18 December 2012 10:20:39 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 09.46.13, Alan Alpert wrote:
> > > > B) QAction is moved
On 18 December 2012 21:15, Oswald Buddenhagen
wrote:
> in the qtcreator repository for example i established the convention
> that temporary branches must all have a wip/ prefix.
> a similar convention could be adopted for vendor branches, say a vendor/
> (gasp!) prefix.
>
> go/no-go?
Makes sense
Congratulations :)
On 12/18/2012 11:18 PM, Marc Mutz wrote:
... please cut me some slack while I handle the attached non-maskable
interrupt :)
Thanks,
Marc
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/
On 19 Dec 2012, at 9:13 AM, André Somers wrote:
> Op 14-12-2012 8:45, Bache-Wiig Jens schreef:
>> What I would propose is that we keep the QAction exactly as it is and make
>> it possible to use it from QML as well as introduce a new slightly
>> simplified QML Action component as previously sugg
Op 19-12-2012 11:52, Rutledge Shawn schreef:
> On 19 Dec 2012, at 9:13 AM, André Somers wrote:
>
>> Op 14-12-2012 8:45, Bache-Wiig Jens schreef:
>>> What I would propose is that we keep the QAction exactly as it is and make
>>> it possible to use it from QML as well as introduce a new slightly
>>
On 12/18/2012 10:06 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> (...)
> oh. eh. this is somewhat more extreme than expected. in fact, your
> branch is everything *but* a long-living branch - it's basically a
> scratch branch which is recreated every few days. the problem with
> rebasing is that you "detach" t
On 19.12.2012 13.08, "Peter Hartmann" wrote:
>
>On 12/18/2012 10:06 PM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
>> (...)
>> oh. eh. this is somewhat more extreme than expected. in fact, your
>> branch is everything *but* a long-living branch - it's basically a
>> scratch branch which is recreated every few da
Why don't build an 64-bit package for Windows before the final release?
2012/12/18 Motyka Rafal
> Hello,
>
> There is new version available for testing:
> http://releases.qt-project.org/digia/5.0.0/backups/2012-12-18-389/
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> /Rafal
>
>
>
>
> Rafal Motyka
> QE Engineer
> Di
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 10:25:24 Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> On 12/18/2012 06:46 PM, Alan Alpert wrote:
> [...]
>
> > C) QGuiAction is added to Gui and is used to create the QML API and
> > the bridge with QActions.
>
> [...]
>
> > My favorite of those is C), but there is the unresolved qu
On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 08:57:31 André Somers wrote:
> Op 18-12-2012 20:34, Shawn Rutledge schreef:
> > On 18 December 2012 20:05, Mark wrote:
> >> On Tue, Dec 18, 2012 at 6:46 PM, Alan Alpert <4163654...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>> D) QCoreAction is added to Core or Gui and has even less
> >>
On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 10:35:04 Alan Alpert wrote:
> > But I still think the action needs a name, which can be used by the
> > image provider to find the icon. (This is independent of whether the
> > image provider uses files or resources; the icon will be found by name
> > either way.) Ma
Congratulations Marc! Take some time off and enjoy!
I can try to help in the meantime, but I'll also be away between christmas and
new year.
Cheers,
Lars
On Dec 19, 2012, at 12:18 AM, Marc Mutz wrote:
> ... please cut me some slack while I handle the attached non-maskable
> interrupt :)
>
Hi,
Currently my high-dpi work for Qt 4 lives in a separate repository on
github[0]. I would like to move it to gerrit/gitorious to make parallel
development with Qt 5 easier and be able to accept external contributions.
Can we create 4.8-highdpi?
Morten
[0]: https://github.com/msorvig/qt4-hi
Op 19-12-2012 12:46, Stephen Kelly schreef:
> On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 08:57:31 André Somers wrote:
>
>> My preference is D, obviously. I think it makes a lot of sense to be
>> able to use actions in core, non-GUI layers of the application.
> Qt is primarily for creating Guis. I sympathise w
On 19 Dec 2012, at 11:59 AM, André Somers wrote:
> And that new action is also integratable with QtWidgets somehow?
Not that we are planning, but I wonder if we could get that eventually by
having a common base class, or some sort of converter/bridge thing.
> Or is that an action type that only
On 19 Dec 2012, at 12:57 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> I agree. In particular, using objectName for both the name of the action and
> automatically for part of the name of the icon seems like a bad idea to me.
Well objectName has such little use that it's usually left blank, whereas it
would be nic
Hi,
I'm happy to tell you that we have now released Qt 5.0, just in time before
christmas.
Please check out my blog post post at
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2012/12/19/qt-5-0/
and the Qt Project (http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2012/12/19/qt-5-0/)
and Digia (http://qt.digia.com/qt5) landing pag
Ich bin vom 19.12.2012 - 14.01. 2013 im Urlaub.
Die Mails werden weder gelesen noch weitergeleitet.
Mit freundlichen Gruessen
i. A. Michael Klank
Abt. VT-APL
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/lis
Now that we have 5.0 finally out, I thought I'll give a short update about the
plans for 5.0.1 and 5.1.
The current idea is to do a 5.0.1 release pretty soon. We already have quite a
few fixes in stable that aren't in the release, and we'll be busy fixing more
bugs over the next weeks. So my go
On quarta-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2012 19.21.47, Loaden wrote:
> Why don't build an 64-bit package for Windows before the final release?
Because they weren't part of RC2. We're not going to release something we
haven't tested.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Arch
On quarta-feira, 19 de dezembro de 2012 14.07.29, List for announcements
regarding Qt releases and development wrote:
> Please check out my blog post post at
> http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2012/12/19/qt-5-0/ and the Qt Project
> (http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2012/12/19/qt-5-0/) and Digia
> (http
On Dec 19, 2012, at 3:07 PM, List for announcements regarding Qt releases and
development mailto:annou...@qt-project.org>> wrote:
Hi,
I'm happy to tell you that we have now released Qt 5.0, just in time before
christmas.
Please check out my blog post post at
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/201
also, is there a one bundle Qt SDK as used to be for open source
development in the Nokia times? It seems the creator is now a separate
options, not an issue to set it all up but what abut complete noobs coming
to the SDK?
-Sivan
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Thiago Macieira
wrote:
> On quar
Hello,
I think I might have stumbled upon a bug in QGLWidget affecting QPA platforms.
This happens at least in BlackBerry, but I suspect it is a general issue.
When a QGLWidget is instantiated, a new native window is created once
Q[GL]Widget::winId() is called. This ultimately leads to a call to
On 12/19/2012 05:33 PM, Sivan Greenberg wrote:
> also, is there a one bundle Qt SDK as used to be for open source
> development in the Nokia times? It seems the creator is now a separate
> options, not an issue to set it all up but what abut complete noobs
> coming to the SDK?
>
please download it
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:06 AM, André Somers wrote:
> Op 19-12-2012 12:46, Stephen Kelly schreef:
>> On Wednesday, December 19, 2012 08:57:31 André Somers wrote:
>>
>>> My preference is D, obviously. I think it makes a lot of sense to be
>>> able to use actions in core, non-GUI layers of the appl
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:17 AM, Rutledge Shawn
wrote:
> On 19 Dec 2012, at 12:57 PM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
>> I agree. In particular, using objectName for both the name of the action and
>> automatically for part of the name of the icon seems like a bad idea to me.
>
> Well objectName has such lit
Congratulations on the Qt 5 release!
Already using it for a (very small) project :)
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 3:07 PM, List for announcements regarding Qt
releases and development wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm happy to tell you that we have now released Qt 5.0, just in time before
> christmas.
>
> Please c
Hello
Qt 5.0 contains a new set of atomics code, based on QAtomicOps. The code is
cleaner and contains already some new features, like QAtomicInteger
on all platforms, plus other sizes on specific platforms.
I'd like to propose the following:
- Qt 5.1 deprecates the old atomic code and their p
Why the 64bit for MSVC2010 weren't part of RC2.
I remember the Qt-Term promise will make both 32bit and 64bit package for
msvc2010 happen in Qt5 final release.
Am I wrong or missed something?
2012/12/19 Thiago Macieira
> Because they weren't part of RC2.
--
*Please don't ask where I come fr
> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5 RC Testing
>
> Why the 64bit for MSVC2010 weren't part of RC2.
>
> I remember the Qt-Term promise will make both 32bit and 64bit package for
> msvc2010 happen in Qt5 final
> release.
>
> Am I wrong or missed something?
We were aiming to have MSVC 2010 64 bit pa
Good day!
Just one question.
What about mingw official builds.
--
Oleg Shalnev (Kalpa Project)
--
mailto: o...@kalpa.ru
skype: oleg_shalnev
jabber: oleg.shal...@gmail.com
___
Development mailing l
> Subject: [Development] Qt5 mingw official build
>
> Good day!
>
> Just one question.
>
> What about mingw official builds.
As Lars already pointed out in the blog post (http://blog.qt.digia.com/) we'll
"work on delivering these as soon as possible", hopefully with 5.0.1. You can
in the mean ti
On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 23.24.00, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 10.19.31, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 16.11.44, Hausmann Simon wrote:
> > > That's what I was afraid of. Perhaps your instructions should be
> > > e
On quinta-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2012 07.34.43, Koehne Kai wrote:
> As Lars already pointed out in the blog post (http://blog.qt.digia.com/)
> we'll "work on delivering these as soon as possible", hopefully with 5.0.1.
> You can in the mean time compile on your own, preferably with a Mingw-w64
>
37 matches
Mail list logo
