Hi everybody,
Please have a look at
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/08/20/adding-lgpl-v3-to-qt/ for details.
I’m happy to discuss further here on the mailing list.
Cheers,
Lars
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
On 08/20/2014 11:02 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
Please have a look at
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/08/20/adding-lgpl-v3-to-qt/ for details.
Looking at the Fedora corpus, there are quite a few programs which link
against Qt and which are licensed under the GPL, version 2, but not any
later
On 08/20/2014 11:30 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
On 20/08/14 11:16, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
On 08/20/2014 11:02 AM, Knoll Lars wrote:
Please have a look at
http://blog.qt.digia.com/blog/2014/08/20/adding-lgpl-v3-to-qt/ for
details.
Looking at the Fedora corpus, there are quite a
Dear Thiago
As I have mentioned in QTBUG-40641, I think the root cause is the function
QDirectFbIntegration::initialize() was called two times. Since the Qtcore will
call it, the original code in
QDirectFbIntegrationPlugin::create() should be deleted. Do you think is it
reasonable?
Does Qt
Hello,
I recently ported application from Qt4 to Qt5 and I rewrote a bit the
audioplayer in it. Now it is using QtMultimedia instead of Phonon.
I noticed that mpc file are not read. I got this error: [Error: Could
not decode stream.]
I installed some packages on my linux about musepack:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 10:42:00AM +, Nancy Zou wrote:
Dear Thiago
As I have mentioned in QTBUG-40641, I think the root cause is the function
QDirectFbIntegration::initialize() was called two times. Since the Qtcore
will call it, the original code in
Hi I am currently designing multimedia support for my application. I am
wondering which approach to take. Should I make use of the phonon library
or make use of the multimedia support provided in the Qt multimedia
library? We are currently making use of Qt 4.8, where phonon is supported.
However,
On 2014-08-20, Thorvaldur Jochumsson jochums...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi I am currently designing multimedia support for my application. I am
wondering which approach to take. Should I make use of the phonon library
or make use of the multimedia support provided in the Qt multimedia
library? We are
yay! :)
On 20 Aug 2014, at 15:27, Keränen Pasi pasi.kera...@digia.com wrote:
Hi,
As part of Lars’s blog post some of you may have noticed that a new module
called QtCanvas3D became available at https://qt.gitorious.org/qt/qtcanvas3d
QtCanvas3D module is a lightweight implementation of
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 12:34 PM, Shaw Andy andy.s...@digia.com wrote:
If you were using WA_PaintOnScreen then you also need to ensure you
reimplement paintEngine() to return 0. Had you done that at all?
Thanks for your help and sorry for the late reply. I was missing the
return 0 on
I don't think Phonon is a supported backend in Qt 5. You should
probably look into new Qt Multimedia framework. On Linux, this
framework relies on GStreamer (for other platforms, it has different
dependencies).
HTH,
-mandeep
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 7:17 AM, Thorvaldur Jochumsson
Hello!
I've started working on a QOptional class
(https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/92006/).
As Thiago mentioned in gerrit, there are some things to discuss.
First is a QVariant integration. I think, i should add:
1) templatetypename T QVariant::QVariant(const QOptionalT o); constructor
2)
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 22:04:24 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
Hello!
I've started working on a QOptional class
(https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/92006/).
As Thiago mentioned in gerrit, there are some things to discuss.
First is a QVariant integration. I think, i should add:
1)
Иван Комиссаров
20 авг. 2014 г., в 22:49, Marc Mutz marc.m...@kdab.com написал(а):
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 20:04:24 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
static fromOptionalValue()
(like fromValue())
Please don't add a templated ctor to QVariant. It currently doesn't have one,
and if you add that
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 21:03:21 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
So, we construct null QOptional from invalid QVariant and non-null
QOptional from valid?
In current terms, yes. I like Thiago's implicit suggestion (in the change
comments) to use isEmpty(), though (instead of isNull()).
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 21:16:22 Marc Mutz wrote:
I like Thiago's implicit suggestion (in the change
comments) to use isEmpty(), though (instead of isNull()).
Actually, on second thought, given the (desirable) conversion to
RestrictedBool, I'd stay with isNull() after all.
--
Qt
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 21:03:21 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
I'm not sure QOptional should mimick T*, not QVariant, but ok.
QOptionalT opt;
T *pt;
QVariant v;
if (opt) ...
if (tp) ...
if (v) ... // ERROR
if (!opt) // operator! missing, btw
if (!tp)
if (!v)
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 22:04:24 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
More, this implementation has a problem - QOptional(T) constructor can't be
marked constexpr (as it uses placement new), which makes class useless for
constant expressions at all.
It's valid in C++14
We need a new macro that only
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 20:49:03 Marc Mutz wrote:
I don't find the QVariant::isNull behaviour any useful or intuitive. It's
too smart. You can always use v.valueT().isNull() because value() will
return a default-constructed T if invalid.
I agree it's not intuitive, but it's there and this
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 21:27:44 Marc Mutz wrote:
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 21:03:21 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
I'm not sure QOptional should mimick T*, not QVariant, but ok.
QOptionalT opt;
T *pt;
QVariant v;
if (opt) ...
if (tp) ...
if (v) ... // ERROR
if (!opt) //
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 23:17:32 Olivier Goffart wrote:
On Wednesday 20 August 2014 22:04:24 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
More, this implementation has a problem - QOptional(T) constructor can't
be
marked constexpr (as it uses placement new), which makes class useless for
constant
21 matches
Mail list logo
