Re: [Development] Input events handling ideas and feedback

Thank you Shawn for your reply > Control is composed of fewer objects. You should be testing it for some time already. Well i already used the QtQuickControls 2 and i do understand that their design if superior (like for example the font handling) but i still think that composition of multiple

Re: [Development] Input events handling ideas and feedback

Please let's try not go off topic. This post is for improving and collecting ideas for improving the QtQuick event handling. I would be more interested in knowing the struggle you had dealing with it and discussing the idea i've proposed F. 2016-06-27 11:28 GMT+02:00 Uwe Rathmann

Re: [Development] RHEL 7.2 added to Coin

On mandag 27. juni 2016 14.30.48 CEST Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > Hi all, > > good news when it comes to packaging on Linux, we added red hat 7.2 as the > new packaging config for the dev branch - Qt 5.8 that is. We'll also run it > as developer build with the 5.7 branch. I'll flip the switch to

[Development] RHEL 7.2 added to Coin

Hi all, good news when it comes to packaging on Linux, we added red hat 7.2 as the new packaging config for the dev branch - Qt 5.8 that is. We'll also run it as developer build with the 5.7 branch. I'll flip the switch to actually run it in a few minutes. I'd not be terribly surprised if

Re: [Development] Qt 5.8 branching & Feature Freeze

On Mon, Jun 27, 2016 at 10:29:34AM +, Edward Welbourne wrote: > this would bring them to light early and one at a time, which tends to > make them easier to resolve ! > given that mutiple conflicts in the same place are pretty rare, i'll challenge that claim.

Re: [Development] Input events handling ideas and feedback

Disclaimer: I'm writing some mix of personal opinion (which is subject to change anyway) and opinions that I’ve heard from others, in reply to this... > On 27 Jun 2016, at 11:28, Uwe Rathmann wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:39:42 +, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > >>

Re: [Development] Qt 5.8 branching & Feature Freeze

Jędrzej Nowacki said (inter alia): >Technically waiting for merges is not necessary. Coin is able > to test arbitrary refs from gerrit, I encourage you to not wait for > the system, but just make bunch of changes and tests the expected > combination, before it gets merged from stable

Re: [Development] [Releasing] brown paper bag issue in Qt 5.6.1 packages

> -Original Message- > From: sean.harmer On Behalf Of Sean Harmer > Sent: maanantaina 27. kesäkuuta 2016 11.46 > To: development@qt-project.org > Cc: Tuukka Turunen > Subject: Re: [Development] [Releasing] brown paper bag issue in Qt 5.6.1 > packages > > On Monday

Re: [Development] Input events handling ideas and feedback

On 27 June 2016 at 17:28, Uwe Rathmann wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:39:42 +, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > > > We have mostly stopped working on QtQuick Controls 1, because the > > implementation of Controls 2 is much more performant ... > > Controls 2 are for

Re: [Development] Input events handling ideas and feedback

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016 08:39:42 +, Shawn Rutledge wrote: > We have mostly stopped working on QtQuick Controls 1, because the > implementation of Controls 2 is much more performant ... Controls 2 are for "embedded" - what at least means to me: not being for desktop applications. > It was

Re: [Development] [Releasing] brown paper bag issue in Qt 5.6.1 packages

On Monday 27 June 2016 07:18:02 Tuukka Turunen wrote: > > -Original Message- > > From: Development [mailto:development- > > bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Sean Harmer > > Sent: perjantaina 24. kesäkuuta 2016 11.23 > > To: development@qt-project.org > > Subject:

Re: [Development] Input events handling ideas and feedback

> On 25 Jun 2016, at 15:15, Filippo Cucchetto > wrote: > > hi everyone, > this is going to be a lengthy email so i'd like to thank those > who will read it and maybe give me their opinions. > The topic here is throwing some ideas for improving QtQuick event >

Re: [Development] [Releasing] brown paper bag issue in Qt 5.6.1 packages

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago > Macieira > Sent: maanantaina 27. kesäkuuta 2016 10.58 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] [Releasing] brown paper bag issue in Qt

Re: [Development] [Releasing] brown paper bag issue in Qt 5.6.1 packages

On sábado, 25 de junho de 2016 21:24:12 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 24 de junho de 2016 08:51:51 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On sexta-feira, 24 de junho de 2016 10:26:37 PDT Tuukka Turunen wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I do not know why 5.6.1 has been deleted, but it is of

Re: [Development] [Releasing] brown paper bag issue in Qt 5.6.1 packages

On segunda-feira, 27 de junho de 2016 07:18:02 PDT Tuukka Turunen wrote: > In general, it is valuable to be able to make releases quickly to fix e.g. a > security vulnerability. The fastest way to do it is to push the needed > change (or changes) into the release branch, and create new release >

Re: [Development] [Releasing] brown paper bag issue in Qt 5.6.1 packages

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Sean Harmer > Sent: perjantaina 24. kesäkuuta 2016 11.23 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] [Releasing] brown paper bag issue in Qt 5.6.1 >