Hi Tuuka,
By that link I didn't mean QTBUG-102962 exactly, but 23 matching bugs for a
single component (which is not even one of the top-wanted components).
On vanilla 6.2.4, QCamera simply doesn't work on many Android devices. All
these issues were resolved for 6.2.5. Coincident?
> We are no
El dilluns, 19 de setembre de 2022, a les 14:59:46 (CEST), Shawn Rutledge va
escriure:
> On 2022 Sep 19, at 12:38, Till Kamppeter
> mailto:till.kamppe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> On 16/09/2022 08:32, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
> But Qt has its own D-Bus implementation, so we tend to prefer using that,
>
Hi Konstantin,
I am sorry to hear that you are unhappy with Qt 6.2 moving to the
commercial-only long-term-support phase with release of Qt 6.2.5.
We are no holding back on bug fixes, though.
All applicable bug fixes go to dev and are picked to all active branches. The
fix to QTBUG-102962 was
> On 19 Sep 2022, at 18:21, Till Kamppeter wrote:
>
> On 19/09/2022 15:43, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
>>>
>>> First is to create a new Qt print backend, what, instead of communicating
>>> directly with CUPS, communicates with the CPDB backends. It is some kind of
>>> "middle end", on one end
On 19/09/2022 15:43, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
First is to create a new Qt print backend, what, instead of communicating directly with
CUPS, communicates with the CPDB backends. It is some kind of "middle end", on
one end being a Qt print backend and on the other end being a CPDB frontend.''
On 19/09/2022 14:59, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
A re-implementation of the frontend part of CPDB with Qt's D-Bus
implementation to overcome the need of two different libraries for
D-Bus access in the whole Qt print dialog would lead to a maintenance
overhead. Any change in the D-Bus interface in
Hi,
I'd like to propose Szabolcs David as an Qt Project Approver.
Dashboard: https://codereview.qt-project.org/dashboard/1002939
Szabolcs has been working for us as an external contributor for at least 8
years now. With that many years of experience contributing to Qt WebEngine, I
think it is
> On 19 Sep 2022, at 00:51, Till Kamppeter wrote:
> We do not do any GUI design or change as part of our project. We only add a
> new method to obtain the available printers, their capabilities and options,
> and to send off print jobs to them.
That’s good news.
>
> First is to create a
On 2022 Sep 19, at 12:38, Till Kamppeter
mailto:till.kamppe...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 16/09/2022 08:32, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
But Qt has its own D-Bus implementation, so we tend to prefer using that,
rather than using some external library that uses some other library that talks
to D-Bus.
It is probably the most destructive and annoying thing you did!
I'll try to rephrase what you said in that announcement: "Dear community,
please stick to unstable, semi-functional versions of Qt, test them and
report bugs you've found (for free), so we could better support our
valuable customers
On 16/09/2022 08:32, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
Along with Chris, I’m wondering why you think it should be a plugin.
Anyway it seems some misunderstandings are possible. Lars wrote "code
that uses the CPDB dialogs instead of our own implementations”… but are
there replacement GUI dialogs? The
11 matches
Mail list logo
