Hello Morten,
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:53:07 +
Morten Sørvig wrote:
> These are of the “need to get around to it” category for my part.
> For 528953 we need to make sure we are not regressing
> other platforms, and I have at least one related bug I’d like to take
> a look at at the same
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 08:12:51 +
Morten Sørvig wrote:
> Should this be up to the application (somehow)? There is more than
> one way to handle DPI settings on X11, so we could enable apps to
> make choices which are different from the Qt default.
Well, there's only one way currently
On Apr 12, 2024, at 11:51, Ilya Fedin wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:53:07 +
Morten Sørvig wrote:
- Should Qt read Gdk settings? Should the XCB platform plugin read
Gdk settings? The current approach is that we stick to X11-level
settings, at least as far as DPI is concerned.
I hope the
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 10:53:07 +
Morten Sørvig wrote:
> Hello Ilya!
>
> > On Apr 9, 2024, at 00:17, Ilya Fedin wrote:
> >
> >
> > 2. https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/444859 which is
> > 1.5 years old and no review
> >
>
> This one could be candidate for discussion on the
Hello Ilya!
> On Apr 9, 2024, at 00:17, Ilya Fedin wrote:
>
>
> 2. https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/444859 which is 1.5
> years old and no review
>
This one could be candidate for discussion on the mailing list. There are two
issues:
- Should Qt read Gdk settings? Should the
On Tuesday 9 April 2024 10:12:48 PDT Ilya Fedin wrote:
> Oh, sorry, I was answering in quite a sleepy state but now I checked the
> change you quoted and it seems I did almost everything as you said? The
> change is supplied at Nov 23, 2022 which is long before Christmas, with
> only a rebase and
On Mon, 08 Apr 2024 22:36:56 -0500
Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday 8 April 2024 17:17:04 CDT Ilya Fedin wrote:
> > 2. https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/444859 which is
> > 1.5 years old and no review
>
> Submitted during Christmas break and no changes since New Years. No
>
В Mon, 08 Apr 2024 22:36:56 -0500
Thiago Macieira пишет:
> On Monday 8 April 2024 17:17:04 CDT Ilya Fedin wrote:
> > 2. https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/444859 which is
> > 1.5 years old and no review
>
> Submitted during Christmas break and no changes since New Years. No
>
On Monday 8 April 2024 17:17:04 CDT Ilya Fedin wrote:
> 2. https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/444859 which is 1.5
> years old and no review
Submitted during Christmas break and no changes since New Years. No wonder it
was missed. You should have sent a "ping" during the second week
Hi,
I have no horse in these particular races, but I am going to throw my
2c in regardless:
In my opinion, 6 months or so delay on some reviews is fairly
acceptable (there can be higher-priority items which take attention,
it's understandable).
But beyond that, especially if the contributor is
I have multiple changes which hang for months and years which no idea
what to do to push them forward... I tried to write there asking for
review but reviewers seem to just ignore the messages...
1. The oldest change I have is
https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtbase/+/343628 which is 3
11 matches
Mail list logo
