Hello,
For some time, I have been working on a QtCore-based class that would be a
container class of arbitrary dimensionality. I did give a presentation on this
topic at DevDays-CA:
http://www.qtdeveloperdays.com/northamerica/sites/default/files/presentation_pdf/QNDArray%20at%20Qt%20Developer%
On Friday, December 28, 2012 08:36:21 Glen Mabey wrote:
> #define Q_DECLARE_METATYPE_2(h1,h2) \
> QT_BEGIN_NAMESPACE \
> template <> struct QMetaTypeId< h1,h2 > { \
> enum { Defined = 1 }; \
> static int qt_metatype_id() { \
> static QBasicAtomicInt metatype_id =
> Q_BASIC
28.12.2012, 18:36, "Glen Mabey" :
> Hello,
>
> For some time, I have been working on a QtCore-based class that would be a
> container class of arbitrary dimensionality.
Looks like it has been already implemented here:
http://code.google.com/p/ndarray
--
Regards,
Konstantin
__
On Dec 28, 2012, at 9:02 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 28.12.2012, 18:36, "Glen Mabey" :
>> Hello,
>>
>> For some time, I have been working on a QtCore-based class that would be a
>> container class of arbitrary dimensionality.
>
> Looks like it has been already implemented here:
>
> http:/
On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 08:36:21AM -0600, Glen Mabey wrote:
> Issue 8) I did not see any output from the sanity bot when I did a
> git commit even though I had installed the symlink
> /.git/hooks/post-commit to git_post_commit_hook … any tips for getting
> that to run would be appreciated.
>
don'
On Jan 7, 2013, at 7:01 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 08:36:21AM -0600, Glen Mabey wrote:
>> Issue 8) I did not see any output from the sanity bot when I did a
>> git commit even though I had installed the symlink
>> /.git/hooks/post-commit to git_post_commit_hook … any
On Friday 28 December 2012 08:36:21 Glen Mabey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some time, I have been working on a QtCore-based class that would be a
> container class of arbitrary dimensionality. I did give a presentation on
> this topic at DevDays-CA:
Just my personal opinion on this:
I do not think
>
> Glen Mabey wrote:
> Hello,
> >
> > For some time, I have been working on a QtCore-based class that would be
> a
> > container class of arbitrary dimensionality. I did give a presentation
> on
> > this topic at DevDays-CA:
>
Olivier Goffart responded:
> Just my personal opinion on this:
>
>
> If added to Qt, we would consider dropping our in-house implementations
to use Glen's QNDArray (this is serious investigation at present).
What stops you or anyone else from using QNDArray if it is maintained
outside of Qt?
Regards,
Rob.
On 9 January 2013 13:50, Charley Bay wrote:
> If add
Robert wrote:
> > If added to Qt, we would consider dropping our in-house implementations
> to use Glen's QNDArray (this is serious investigation at present).
>
> What stops you or anyone else from using QNDArray if it is maintained
> outside of Qt?
>
Nothing (that would be a minor barrier). Ho
On Jan 9, 2013, at 5:54 AM, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> On Friday 28 December 2012 08:36:21 Glen Mabey wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> For some time, I have been working on a QtCore-based class that would be a
>> container class of arbitrary dimensionality. I did give a presentation on
>> this topic at Dev
On quarta-feira, 9 de janeiro de 2013 13.19.10, Glen Mabey wrote:
> On Jan 9, 2013, at 5:54 AM, Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > On Friday 28 December 2012 08:36:21 Glen Mabey wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> For some time, I have been working on a QtCore-based class that would be
> >> a
> >> container class
On Jan 9, 2013, at 4:02 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> I'm not sure it's out of scope for Qt. In fact, I don't know yet whether it
> should be part of Qt Core or not. I guess I am the person to make that
> particular call.
I'm very glad to hear that you are willing to consider it.
> So what I n
On Jan 10, 2013, at 6:30 AM, Martin Sandsmark wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 01:08:29PM -0600, Glen Mabey wrote:
>>> Looks like it has been already implemented here:
>>> http://code.google.com/p/ndarray
>> Humm -- it doesn't look to me like it's based on QtCore … and avoiding a
>> Boost depende
On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:02:17 -0600, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> > I think this is out of the scope of Qt. I do not see that many uses
>> > case for normal Qt applications.
>>
>> I am not surprised that some developers would feel this way, and I
>> think I would also feel that way if Qt were still
On 12/28/2012 03:36 PM, Glen Mabey wrote:
> Hello,
>
> For some time, I have been working on a QtCore-based class that would be a
> container class of arbitrary dimensionality. I did give a presentation on
> this topic at DevDays-CA:
>
> http://www.qtdeveloperdays.com/northamerica/sites/default/
11.01.2013, 11:57, "Uwe Rathmann" :
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:02:17 -0600, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
I think this is out of the scope of Qt. I do not see that many uses
case for normal Qt applications.
>>> I am not surprised that some developers would feel this way, and I
>>> think I
On Jan 11, 2013, at 1:56 AM, Uwe Rathmann wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jan 2013 16:02:17 -0600, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
I think this is out of the scope of Qt. I do not see that many uses
case for normal Qt applications.
>>>
>>> I am not surprised that some developers would feel this way, an
On Jan 11, 2013, at 2:03 AM, Samuel Rødal wrote:
> On 12/28/2012 03:36 PM, Glen Mabey wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> For some time, I have been working on a QtCore-based class that would be a
>> container class of arbitrary dimensionality. I did give a presentation on
>> this topic at DevDays-CA:
>>
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 07:19:19 -0600, Glen Mabey wrote:
>> Something I was missing several times is a 2D container. Qt has objects
>> organized in rows and columns ( QTable, QImage ... ) - so IMHO it is
>> related to Qt.
>>
>> But I would expect to find a class with an API comparable to QVector.
>
On 01/11/2013 02:41 PM, Glen Mabey wrote:
>
> On Jan 11, 2013, at 2:03 AM, Samuel Rødal wrote:
>
>> On 12/28/2012 03:36 PM, Glen Mabey wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> For some time, I have been working on a QtCore-based class that would be a
>>> container class of arbitrary dimensionality. I did give a
Hello --
On Friday, December 28, 2012 8:55 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> On Friday, December 28, 2012 08:36:21 Glen Mabey wrote:
>> #define Q_DECLARE_METATYPE_2(h1,h2) \
>> QT_BEGIN_NAMESPACE \
>> template <> struct QMetaTypeId< h1,h2 > { \
>> enum { Defined = 1 }; \
>> static int qt_meta
On Saturday, January 19, 2013 22:26:23 Glen Mabey wrote:
> Hello --
>
> On Friday, December 28, 2012 8:55 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> > On Friday, December 28, 2012 08:36:21 Glen Mabey wrote:
> >> #define Q_DECLARE_METATYPE_2(h1,h2) \
> >>
> >> QT_BEGIN_NAMESPACE \
> >> template <> struct QMetaT
On Jan 21, 2013, at 2:36 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Yes. But note that the user does not have to do anything special in order to
> put the container in a QVariant.
> Not needed at all.
*That* is what I didn't understand -- and I don't see any notion of that in the
QMetaType docs, but that's
On Jan 21, 2013, at 2:36 AM, Stephen Kelly wrote:
> Yes. But note that the user does not have to do anything special in order to
> put the container in a QVariant.
> Not needed at all.
*That* is what I didn't understand -- and I don't see any notion of that in the
QMetaType docs, but that's
Hello,
On Wednesday 9 January 2013 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> I'm not sure it's out of scope for Qt. In fact, I don't know yet whether it
> should be part of Qt Core or not. I guess I am the person to make that
> particular call.
>
> So what I need from Glen is, at least, the proposed API docs with
26 matches
Mail list logo