Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 09:00 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:54:09AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:36 +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > > > On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:22:57 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > > > > > However, I fear these board specific

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Alex Courbot
On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:54:09 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:36 +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > > > On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:22:57 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > > > > > > > However, I fear these board specific things may be qui

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:54:09AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:36 +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > > On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:22:57 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > > > However, I fear these board specific things may be quite a bit anything, > > > so it may well be pwm,

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:03:27AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 09:00 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:54:09AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:36 +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > > > > On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:22:57 To

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:42:11PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53 Mark Brown wrote: > > It would be sensible to make sure that the framework is done in such a > > way that drivers can use it - there will be drivers (perhaps not display > > ones) that have a kno

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Alex Courbot
On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:03:27 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > * PGP Signed by an unknown key > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 09:00 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:54:09AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:36 +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > > > >

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Alex Courbot
On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:19:30 Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 03:42:11PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > > On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53 Mark Brown wrote: > > > It would be sensible to make sure that the framework is done in such a > > > way that drivers can use it - ther

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 09:18 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:03:27AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 09:00 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:54:09AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:36 +0900, Alex C

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:03:27AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 09:00 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:54:09AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:36 +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > > > > On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:22:57 To

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Mark Brown
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:26:34PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:19:30 Mark Brown wrote: > > > On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53 Mark Brown wrote: > > > > It would be sensible to make sure that the framework is done in such a > > > > way that drivers can use it

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:29:20AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:03:27AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 09:00 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:54:09AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:36 +090

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 09:29 +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:03:27AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 09:00 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:54:09AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:36 +0900, Alex

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Mark Brown
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 06:57:44PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote: > Some device drivers (panel backlights especially) need to follow precise > sequences for powering on and off, involving gpios, regulators, PWMs > with a precise powering order and delays to respect between each steps. > These sequ

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Alex Courbot
On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:50:37 Sascha Hauer wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:29:20AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:03:27AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 09:00 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:54:09AM +0

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 05:21:10PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: > On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:50:37 Sascha Hauer wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 09:29:20AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 10:03:27AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 09:00 +0

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Thierry Reding
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:00:18AM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > Yes, I think the backlight and the panel should be considered separate > devices. Just like, say, a touch screen and a panel may happen to be in > the same display module, a backlight and a panel can be in the same > display module.

Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: topology: set the capacity of each cores for big.LITTLE

2012-09-13 Thread Vincent Guittot
On 10 July 2012 15:42, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 14:35 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> >> May be the last one which enable ARCH_POWER should also go into tip ? >> > OK, I can take it. Hi Peter, I can't find the patch that enable ARCH_POWER in the tip tree. Have you take it i

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-13 Thread Dave Martin
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > > > You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings. > > > While it is a PPC doc, we should reuse or extend what

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-13 Thread Dave Martin
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 09:34:28PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > >>> You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings. > >>> While

Re: [PATCH v2] of: Add videomode helper

2012-09-13 Thread Tomi Valkeinen
On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 09:56 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > This patch adds a helper function for parsing videomodes from the devicetree. > The videomode can be either converted to a struct drm_display_mode or a > struct fb_videomode. I have more or less the same generic comment for this as for the p

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-13 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Dave Martin wrote: > On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 07:14:58PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > - hcall-instructions > > potentially interesting, but given that for Xen we are quite happy with > > HVC, we are not going to add any

[PATCH 3.6.0-rc5] dt: introduce of_get_child to get child node by name.

2012-09-13 Thread Srinivas KANDAGATLA
From: Srinivas Kandagatla This patch introduces of_get_child function to get a child node by its name in a given parent node. Without this patch each driver code has to iterate the parent and do a string compare, However having of_get_child libary function would avoid code duplication, errors an

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-13 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Dave Martin wrote: > Do you think it's feasible to standardise on some interoperable ABI for > kvm and Xen? This sounds pretty optimistic, but I'm not aware of all > the technicalities, or what possible third-party hypervisors are out > there. > > If we could do it, it would

Re: [PATCH v2] of: Add videomode helper

2012-09-13 Thread Sascha Hauer
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 01:54:07PM +0300, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > On Wed, 2012-07-04 at 09:56 +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote: > > This patch adds a helper function for parsing videomodes from the > > devicetree. > > The videomode can be either converted to a struct drm_display_mode or a > > struct fb_v

Re: [PATCH v3 06/25] docs: Xen ARM DT bindings

2012-09-13 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > On 09/12/2012 01:14 PM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > On Wed, 12 Sep 2012, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > >> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Rob Herring wrote: > >>> You should look at ePAPR 1.1 which defines hypervisor related bindings. > >>> While it is a PPC doc, we s

Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: topology: set the capacity of each cores for big.LITTLE

2012-09-13 Thread Peter Zijlstra
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 11:17 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > On 10 July 2012 15:42, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 14:35 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > >> > >> May be the last one which enable ARCH_POWER should also go into tip ? > >> > > OK, I can take it. > > Hi Peter, > > I c

Re: [PATCH v4 0/5] ARM: topology: set the capacity of each cores for big.LITTLE

2012-09-13 Thread Vincent Guittot
On 13 September 2012 14:07, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 11:17 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> On 10 July 2012 15:42, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> > On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 14:35 +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: >> >> >> >> May be the last one which enable ARCH_POWER should also go into

Re: [PATCH v4 3/5] ARM: topology: Update cpu_power according to DT information

2012-09-13 Thread Dave Martin
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 11:27:04AM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote: > Use cpu compatibility field and clock-frequency field of DT to > estimate the capacity of each core of the system and to update > the cpu_power field accordingly. > This patch enables to put more running tasks on big cores than > on

[PATCH 1/1] ARM: at91: fix missing #interrupt-cells on gpio-controller

2012-09-13 Thread Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD
Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD Cc: Nicolas Ferre --- arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260.dtsi |3 +++ arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263.dtsi |5 + arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g45.dtsi |5 + arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9n12.dtsi |4 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9x5.dtsi

Re: [PATCH 3.6.0-rc5] dt: introduce of_get_child to get child node by name.

2012-09-13 Thread Stephen Warren
On 09/13/2012 05:10 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote: > From: Srinivas Kandagatla > > This patch introduces of_get_child function to get a child node by its > name in a given parent node. > > Without this patch each driver code has to iterate the parent and do > a string compare, However having of_

Re: [PATCH v6 0/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Stephen Warren
On 09/13/2012 01:29 AM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 04:26:34PM +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: >> On Thursday 13 September 2012 15:19:30 Mark Brown wrote: On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:25:53 Mark Brown wrote: > It would be sensible to make sure that the framework is done in s

Re: [PATCH 3.6.0-rc5] dt: introduce of_get_child to get child node by name.

2012-09-13 Thread Srinivas KANDAGATLA
On 13/09/12 16:14, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 09/13/2012 05:10 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote: >> From: Srinivas Kandagatla >> >> This patch introduces of_get_child function to get a child node by its >> name in a given parent node. >> >> Without this patch each driver code has to iterate the pare

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Stephen Warren
On 09/13/2012 01:08 AM, Alex Courbot wrote: > On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:54:09 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >> * PGP Signed by an unknown key >> >> On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 15:36 +0900, Alex Courbot wrote: >> >>> On Thursday 13 September 2012 14:22:57 Tomi Valkeinen wrote: >>> >>> >>> However,

Re: [PATCH 3.6.0-rc5] dt: introduce of_get_child to get child node by name.

2012-09-13 Thread Rob Herring
On 09/13/2012 10:25 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote: > > On 13/09/12 16:14, Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 09/13/2012 05:10 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote: >>> From: Srinivas Kandagatla >>> >>> This patch introduces of_get_child function to get a child node by its >>> name in a given parent node. >>> >

Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] Runtime Interpreted Power Sequences

2012-09-13 Thread Stephen Warren
On 09/13/2012 12:02 AM, Alex Courbot wrote: > On Thursday 13 September 2012 06:07:13 Stephen Warren wrote: >> On 09/12/2012 03:57 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote: >>> Some device drivers (panel backlights especially) need to follow precise >>> sequences for powering on and off, involving gpios, regulat

Re: [PATCH 3.6.0-rc5] dt: introduce of_get_child to get child node by name.

2012-09-13 Thread Stephen Warren
On 09/13/2012 09:43 AM, Rob Herring wrote: > On 09/13/2012 10:25 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote: >> >> On 13/09/12 16:14, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 09/13/2012 05:10 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote: From: Srinivas Kandagatla This patch introduces of_get_child function to get a child

Re: [PATCH 3.6.0-rc5] dt: introduce of_get_child to get child node by name.

2012-09-13 Thread Srinivas KANDAGATLA
On 13/09/12 16:43, Rob Herring wrote: > On 09/13/2012 10:25 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote: >> On 13/09/12 16:14, Stephen Warren wrote: >>> On 09/13/2012 05:10 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote: From: Srinivas Kandagatla This patch introduces of_get_child function to get a child node by

[PATCH 0/2] lis3: lis3lv02d_i2c: Add device tree support

2012-09-13 Thread AnilKumar Ch
First patch adds device tree support to lis3lv02d_i2c driver and second patch adds platform data for lis331dlh driver to am335x EVM. These patches were tested on AM335x-EVM. AnilKumar Ch (2): lis3: lis3lv02d_i2c: Add device tree support ARM: dts: AM33XX: Add lis331dlh device tree data to am335

[PATCH 1/2] lis3: lis3lv02d_i2c: Add device tree support

2012-09-13 Thread AnilKumar Ch
Add device tree matching table support to lis3lv02d_i2c driver. If the driver data is passed from device tree, then this driver picks up platform data from device node through common/generic lis3lv02d.c driver. Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch --- drivers/misc/lis3lv02d/lis3lv02d_i2c.c | 13 +++

[PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: AM33XX: Add lis331dlh device tree data to am335x-evm

2012-09-13 Thread AnilKumar Ch
Add lis331dlh device tree data to am335x-evm.dts. In AM335x EVM lis331dlh accelerometer is connected to I2C2 bus. So this patch change the status to "okay" to use I2C2 bus. Also added all the required platform data to am335x-evm. Signed-off-by: AnilKumar Ch --- arch/arm/boot/dts/am335x-evm.dts |

Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] Documentation: add description of DT binding for the gpio-mvebu driver

2012-09-13 Thread Rob Herring
On 09/13/2012 10:54 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni > Cc: Grant Likely > Cc: Linus Walleij > Cc: Andrew Lunn > Cc: Jason Cooper > Cc: Gregory Clement > --- Grant is pretty much offline right now. Acked-by: Rob Herring > .../devicetree/bindings/gpio/gpio-mveb

Re: [PATCH 3.6.0-rc5] dt: introduce of_get_child to get child node by name.

2012-09-13 Thread Rob Herring
On 09/13/2012 06:10 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote: > From: Srinivas Kandagatla > > This patch introduces of_get_child function to get a child node by its > name in a given parent node. > > Without this patch each driver code has to iterate the parent and do > a string compare, However having of_

Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] Documentation: add description of DT binding for the gpio-mvebu driver

2012-09-13 Thread Rob Herring
On 09/13/2012 03:30 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Rob Herring, > > On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 15:20:54 -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >> On 09/13/2012 10:54 AM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: >>> Signed-off-by: Thomas Petazzoni >>> Cc: Grant Likely >>> Cc: Linus Walleij >>> Cc: Andrew Lunn >>> Cc: Jason Coo

[PATCH V4 2/2] dmaengine: add helper function to request a slave DMA channel

2012-09-13 Thread Jon Hunter
Currently slave DMA channels are requested by calling dma_request_channel() and requires DMA clients to pass various filter parameters to obtain the appropriate channel. With device-tree being used by architectures such as arm and the addition of device-tree helper functions to extract the relevan

[PATCH V4 0/2] of: Add generic device tree DMA helpers

2012-09-13 Thread Jon Hunter
This is based upon the work by Benoit Cousson [1] and Nicolas Ferre [2] to add some basic device-tree helpers to retrieve a DMA controller device_node and the DMA request/channel information. [1] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.devicetree/12022 [2] http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux

[PATCH V4 1/2] of: Add generic device tree DMA helpers

2012-09-13 Thread Jon Hunter
This is based upon the work by Benoit Cousson [1] and Nicolas Ferre [2] to add some basic helpers to retrieve a DMA controller device_node and the DMA request/channel information. Aim of DMA helpers - The purpose of device-tree is to describe the capabilites of the hardware. Thinking about DMA c

[PATCH V2 0/7] ARM: OMAP2+: Add device-tree support for timers

2012-09-13 Thread Jon Hunter
This series adds device-tree support for the timers on OMAP2+ devices including AM33xx. Testing: 1. I have booted linux with this series on OMAP2420 H4, OMAP3430 Beagle and OMAP4430 Panda with/without device-tree present. 2. Vaibhav has booted linux on AM335x Beagle bone (thanks!) 3. I have tes

[PATCH V2 3/7] ARM: OMAP4: Add timer clock aliases for device-tree

2012-09-13 Thread Jon Hunter
For OMAP4, the dmtimers are located in the Wake-up, ABE and Peripheral (PER) power domains. Hence, when the dmtimer is configured to use the "timer_sys_ck" as its functional clock the actual clock used is different depending on whether the clock is in the Wake-up, ABE or PER domain. So when we look

[PATCH V2 1/7] ARM: dts: OMAP: Add timer nodes

2012-09-13 Thread Jon Hunter
Add the 12 GP timers nodes present in OMAP2. Add the 12 GP timers nodes present in OMAP3. Add the 11 GP timers nodes present in OMAP4. Add the 7 GP timers nodes present in AM33xx. Add documentation for timer properties specific to OMAP. Please note that for OMAP2/3 devices, there is only one inte

[PATCH V2 4/7] ARM: OMAP: Add a timer attribute for timers that can interrupt the DSP

2012-09-13 Thread Jon Hunter
Some instances of the DMTIMER peripheral on OMAP devices have the ability to interrupt the on-chip DSP in addition to the ARM CPU. Add a DMTIMER attribute to indicate which timers can interrupt the DSP. By using the omap_dm_timer_request_by_cap() API, driver will now be able to allocate a DMTIMER t

[PATCH V2 2/7] ARM: OMAP3: Dynamically disable secure timer nodes for secure devices

2012-09-13 Thread Jon Hunter
OMAP3 devices may or may not have security features enabled. Security enabled devices are known as high-secure (HS) and devices without security are known as general purpose (GP). For OMAP3 devices there are 12 general purpose timers available. On secure devices the 12th timer is reserved for secu

[PATCH V2 5/7] ARM: OMAP: Add function to request a timer by capability

2012-09-13 Thread Jon Hunter
Currently OMAP timers can be requested by requesting any available or by a numerical device ID. If a specific timer is required because it has a particular capability, such as can interrupt the on-chip DSP in addition to the ARM CPU, then the user needs to know the device ID of the timer with this

[PATCH V2 7/7] ARM: OMAP: Add DT support for timer driver

2012-09-13 Thread Jon Hunter
In order to add device-tree support to the timer driver the following changes were made ... 1. Allocate system timers (used for clock-events and clock-source) based upon timer properties rather than using an hard-coded timer instance ID. To allow this a new helper function called omap_dmtime

[PATCH V2 6/7] ARM: OMAP3: Add generic machine descriptor for boards with OMAP3 GP devices

2012-09-13 Thread Jon Hunter
OMAP3 devices may or may not have security features enabled. Security enabled devices are known as high-secure (HS) and devices without security are known as general purpose (GP). Some OMAP3 boards, such as the OMAP3 beagle board, only use GP devices and for GP devices there is a 12th timer availa

Re: [PATCH V2 0/7] ARM: OMAP2+: Add device-tree support for timers

2012-09-13 Thread Jon Hunter
On 09/13/2012 06:31 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: > This series adds device-tree support for the timers on OMAP2+ devices > including AM33xx. One more comment. This has been tested on v3.6-rc5 and rebased on top of Tony's devel-dt branch. Cheers Jon ___ device

Re: [PATCH] dma: tegra: use list_move_tail instead of list_del/list_add_tail

2012-09-13 Thread Vinod Koul
On Wed, 2012-09-05 at 15:08 +0800, Wei Yongjun wrote: > From: Wei Yongjun > > Using list_move_tail() instead of list_del() + list_add_tail(). > > spatch with a semantic match is used to found this problem. > (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) > > Signed-off-by: Wei Yongjun Applied thanks > --- > dr

[patch] usb: phy: signedness bug in suspend/resume

2012-09-13 Thread Dan Carpenter
"ret" should be signed here for the error handling to work. Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter diff --git a/drivers/usb/phy/omap-usb2.c b/drivers/usb/phy/omap-usb2.c index 15ab3d6..d36c282 100644 --- a/drivers/usb/phy/omap-usb2.c +++ b/drivers/usb/phy/omap-usb2.c @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static int omap_us

Re: [PATCH 3.6.0-rc5] dt: introduce of_get_child to get child node by name.

2012-09-13 Thread Srinivas KANDAGATLA
On 13/09/12 21:32, Rob Herring wrote: > On 09/13/2012 06:10 AM, Srinivas KANDAGATLA wrote: >> From: Srinivas Kandagatla >> >> This patch introduces of_get_child function to get a child node by its >> name in a given parent node. >> >> Without this patch each driver code has to iterate the parent a