On Thu, 23 May 2002, Steve Lewis wrote:
> That is what I thought. When I enable thread-sorting in Squirrel Mail it
> tells me the "IMAP server doesn't support thread sorting".
> I realize the error message may not be accurate, so back to the drawing
> board.
Sorting by thread is a proposed IMAP
www.eboxit.com
At 19:11 23/05/2002 +, you wrote:
>Steve B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > www.eboixit.com is also pretty neat.
>
>Typo? Appears non-existent.
>
>--
>Darrell May
>DMC Netsourced.com
>http://netsourced.com
>http://myEZserver.com
Steve.
http://www.bov.nu
--
Please report bu
That is what I thought. When I enable thread-sorting in Squirrel Mail it
tells me the "IMAP server doesn't support thread sorting".
I realize the error message may not be accurate, so back to the drawing
board.
Thank you,
Steve Lewis
>
> Steve Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I w
Darrell May wrote:
> I'm quite perplexed why Mitel is not moving forward with a newer kernel and
> journalized file system. Shad Lords has done a lot of the ground work and
> has released an iso that is a great starting point. It seems there are now
> answers to all outstanding new kernel iss
HA is a great concept for SME.
E-mail has become a mission critical application in some businesses, we
need to have out-the-box HA SME Server, just like our Enterprise SME
server boy am I a dreamer!
Hsing-Foo Wang wrote:
> Hi Darrell,
>
> Maybe High Availability is getting more intere
I agree Darrell. I am just starting to get my feet wet with development,
however Ext3 or another jounalized file system is giving me reason to
explore alternatives to SME. I will not upgrade my personal servers to any
later version of SME until journalized filesystem is standard.
Just my thoughts.
John Cusick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> The cost of hardware is so phenominally cheap nowadays, what is wrong
> with a simple strategy of using SME at the front door on a cheap 586
> with a couple of drives and pci network cards and then putting a
> high-end, latest and greatest redhat/whatever
On Fri, 24 May 2002, Rob Hillis wrote:
> On Thu, 23 May 2002 23:40, Gordon Rowell wrote:
>
> > I can't speak for the contribs, but...the web panels are independent,
> > so rewriting one panel should have no effect on others. The underlying
> > infrastructure is also independent of the panels.
>
I can understand the frustration that some have with some of these
development issues, however I would like to say that many of the people
that I know that are running the e-smith server have need of the modules
that have not yet been ported to the newer kernel.
With that said,
The cost of ha
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 03:47:28AM +1000, Rob Hillis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> I guess what I'm asking is whether the e-smith perl modules that were used to
> generate the web panels have been removed or altered to the point that would
> make panels *not* written in FormMagick fail to
On Thu, May 23, 2002 at 05:43:21PM -, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > In order to efficiently manage requests for hosting, mirroring and
> > cataloguing of contrib packages and HOWTOs, we've created a new
> > point of contact for the developer community.
>
> Rich, has anyone at
Steve Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to enable thread sorting, if possible, on the SME IMAP
> server. What IMAP server is used on SME?
> Thanks
Steve, AFAIK, threading is done on the client side. This is an option on
some of the better e-mail/webmail clients.
Regard
On Thu, 23 May 2002 23:40, Gordon Rowell wrote:
> > [...]
> > On a slightly different concern, if I upgrade to 5.5b4, are the add-ons
> > to the panel (most notably AWstats, e-smith monitor, and ezmlm) going to
> > break as a result of the web panels being re-written?
> I can't speak for the cont
Rich Lafferty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Developers,
>
> In order to efficiently manage requests for hosting, mirroring and
> cataloguing of contrib packages and HOWTOs, we've created a new
> point of contact for the developer community.
>
> As of right now, please use the following address for
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 03:10:19AM +1000, Rob Hillis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> On a slightly different concern, if I upgrade to 5.5b4, are the add-ons to
> the panel (most notably AWstats, e-smith monitor, and ezmlm) going to break
> as a result of the web panels being re-written?
I
Hsing-Foo Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi Darrell,
>
> Maybe High Availability is getting more interesting to _prevent_ this
> kind of situations.
> What do you think?
HA has it's place. Unfortunately this is more geared to corporate
enterprise. For the typical SME user, HA is overkill.
Developers,
In order to efficiently manage requests for hosting, mirroring and
cataloguing of contrib packages and HOWTOs, we've created a new
point of contact for the developer community.
As of right now, please use the following address for all contact
with Mitel Networks regarding contribs:
On Sun, 19 May 2002 22:53, you wrote:
> 5.5beta4 is now in ftp.e-smith.org/pub/dev and on our mirror sites.
> Please use a mirror close to you.
[...]
> Web panels rewritten with FormMagick
>
On a slightly different concern, if I upgrade to 5.5b4, are the ad
On Sun, 19 May 2002 22:53, you wrote:
> 5.5beta4 is now in ftp.e-smith.org/pub/dev and on our mirror sites.
> Please use a mirror close to you.
[...]
> Web panels rewritten with FormMagick
>
On a slightly different concern, if I upgrade to 5.5b4, are the ad
> e-smith-wu-imap-1.2.0-04
>
> This is the IMAP server, yes?
Yes and no.
That's e-smith templates for wu-imap.
SME has a custom patched version of wu-imap for maildir support.
In my opinion (and, I think, also in Michael Weinberger's) it's not a very
good patch.
Michael has written an howto for
A search of the RPMs on the system shows :
e-smith-wu-imap-1.2.0-04
This is the IMAP server, yes?
Steve Lewis
> Hello,
>
> I would like to enable thread sorting, if possible, on the SME IMAP
> server. What IMAP server is used on SME?
> Thanks
>
> Steve
>
>
>
> --
> Please report bugs to [EMAIL
Hi Darrell,
Maybe High Availability is getting more interesting to _prevent_ this
kind of situations.
What do you think?
Regards,
Hsing-Foo
> Van: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Verzonden: donderdag 23 mei 2002 3:39
> Aan: e-smith-devinfo
> Onderwerp: [e-smith-devinfo] R-Linux, worth
22 matches
Mail list logo
