RE: [e-smith-devinfo] bug reporting suggestion [was: Bug in user groups (v5.5)]

2003-01-04 Thread jeremy
> Rather than trying to monitor two development groups (devinfo and > Darrell's), can I suggest that the footer of the devinfo posts include > something along the lines of "Posting of topics concerning SME Server > bugs are only allowed if accompanied with a Mitel bug ticket number, > which may be

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo Posting (was: bug reporting suggestion)

2003-01-04 Thread Greg Zartman
> Following the above I hope should keep everyone happy as: > - a ticket is opened in Mitel's bug tracking system and prioritized. > - devinfo is not burdened with the issue at all. I agree with Tom: Splitting "the community" between two forums is inherently a bad idea. Devinfo should remain the

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Devinfo Posting (was: bug reporting suggestion)

2003-01-04 Thread Greg Zartman
> Following the above I hope should keep everyone happy as: > - a ticket is opened in Mitel's bug tracking system and prioritized. > - devinfo is not burdened with the issue at all. I agree with Tom: Splitting "the communinty" between two forums is inherently a bad idea. Devinfo should remain th

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Bug in user groups (v5.5)

2003-01-04 Thread Les Mikesell
From: "Rogers, Andrew" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > As a recent subscriber to this mailing list I was not aware that it was a > requirement to make development contributions. It isn't - that was just some well-deserved and (I hope) good natured personal prodding related to issues I have raised in

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Interscan VirusWall Antivirus

2003-01-04 Thread Craig Foster
Sorry - Wrong source. Try Abe Loveless' How-To @ http://www.tech-geeks.org/contrib/loveless/clamav Regards, Craig Foster [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with SMIME) > -Original Message- > From: Craig Foster [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Sunday, January 05, 2003 2:29 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Interscan VirusWall Antivirus

2003-01-04 Thread Craig Foster
I really believe the way to go it the qmail-queue method - insert the scanner within the multi-layered security of qmail. It also runs with minimal effect on the Mitel/E-Smith configuration - see recent mentions of clamav on the e-smith.org discussion boards. You may be able to see what they do the

[e-smith-devinfo] Interscan VirusWall Antivirus

2003-01-04 Thread Laurent Roudier
Hi everybody I'am trying to set Interscan VirusWall on a SME box. As describe in the Interscan documentation, I put the antivirus as the listener on the port 25 for the mail, I put qmail on port 10025 and I set VirusWall to transfert the mail to this port. With this configuration, I lost a lot of t

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] bug reporting suggestion [was: Bug in user groups (v5.5)]

2003-01-04 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Sat, Jan 04, 2003 at 02:14:39AM -0800, Tom Carroll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > Rather than trying to monitor two development groups (devinfo and > Darrell's), can I suggest that the footer of the devinfo posts include > something along the lines of "Posting of topics concerning SME Serv

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] bug reporting suggestion [was: Bug in user groups (v5.5)]

2003-01-04 Thread Tom Carroll
Darrell May said: > Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > > > I'm happy for "I think I found and bug and is this > > a legitimate fix?" mails to go to devinfo, as long as we don't > > degenerate into long threads on such topics or turn devinfo > into a bug > > reporting forum. > > > > All