Re: [e-smith-devinfo] [ANNOUNCEMENT] SME 5.6 custom iso HowTo

2003-01-09 Thread Darrell May
John Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I would be glad to document the extra steps if you are interested. I'm always willing to learn new tricks John ;-> Please send to me directly and I'll add your contributions into the HowTo, duly noting the source. Regards, -- Darrell May DMC myEZserver.

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] 5.6dev ISO [was [e-smith-devinfo] Isoqlog and naggin question]

2003-01-09 Thread Brandon Friedman
Sorry folks, I didn't mean to start a brush fire , I was actually thinking about something else entirely.. I know Mitel's policy on these issues, don't ask - just wait! Anyhow I found out what I was looking for Thanks Gordon -- Regards Brandon Friedman ADT South Africa E-mail: [EMAIL P

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] [ANNOUNCEMENT] SME 5.6 custom iso HowTo

2003-01-09 Thread John Powell
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 23:03, Darrell May wrote: > > http://myezserver.com/downloads/mitel/howto/sme-iso-howto.html Hi Darrell, Real nice, and simple, How-To. I do a few more steps, including building a pkgorder file. Some might find problems without a pkgorder file if they do a lot of changes

[e-smith-devinfo] [ANNOUNCEMENT] SME 5.6 custom iso HowTo

2003-01-09 Thread Darrell May
http://myezserver.com/downloads/mitel/howto/sme-iso-howto.html Regards, -- Darrell May DMC myEZserver.com http://myEZserver.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PR

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] 5.6dev ISO [was [e-smith-devinfo] Isoqlog and naggin question]

2003-01-09 Thread Darrell May
Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I've placed the 5.6 anaconda RPM in my contrib area - it should > be on the FTP site within the hour. Downloading now. Thanks Gordon. -- Darrell May DMC myEZserver.com http://myEZserver.com -- Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please mail [EMAI

RE: [e-smith-devinfo] 5.6dev ISO [was [e-smith-devinfo] Isoqlog and naggin question]

2003-01-09 Thread Ryan Duffner
So the current beta sources are up to date and makes up the 5.6 commercial release? Or is there a future release of those SRPMS. If the current beta SRPMS are those of final, then people should stop complaining. One more rant, I am sick of reading stuff that should not be on a development list. Ke

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] 5.6dev ISO [was [e-smith-devinfo] Isoqlog and naggin question]

2003-01-09 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 07:30:25PM -, Darrell May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] > Gordon, I appreciate your frustration, however a statement of that nature > from you is surprising. Actually, it's not surprising (and please note that my response was tagged as a rant). The request had no

[e-smith-devinfo] 5.6dev ISO [was [e-smith-devinfo] Isoqlog and naggin question]

2003-01-09 Thread Darrell May
Gordon Rowell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > or decide to just release the source RPMs and not bother with an ISO > image. I think we would all lose if we made that decision. > Gordon, I appreciate your frustration, however a statement of that nature from you is surprising. Having said this, it i

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Isoqlog and naggin question

2003-01-09 Thread kevin
> >Quite frankly, such nagging is more likely to reduce our priority on >putting together a final 5.6 developer release or decide to just release >the source RPMs and not bother with an ISO image. I think we would all >lose if we made that decision. > This illustrates the conflict that exists

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Isoqlog and naggin question

2003-01-09 Thread Gordon Rowell
On Thu, Jan 09, 2003 at 09:38:54AM +0200, Brandon Friedman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi > Isoqlog compiling: > I am looking to create a rpm for isoqlog on sme (Isoqlog is a maillog file > analysis tool). I am just not sure which version of RH to compile on ? > Should I be compiling serperat