> -Original Message-
> From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2003 9:41 AM
> To: 'D. Thomas Podnar'; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Backup to DVD
>
> > hardware compression, do a Master Backup, and post your summary
here.
>
> Hi To
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 6:26 PM
> To: 'Gordon Rowell'; 'Devlyn Davis'
> Cc: 'Devinfo'
> Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] Backup to DVD
>
> > > To me, that's a compelling reason to begin looking at DVD backup
> >
> -Original Message-
> From: Gordon Rowell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2003 10:39 AM
>
> Please, not to devinfo. As the footer of every message says:
Did Greg mean for all samba's of that version? If not just SME, why not
let us know about a bug in most sambas'
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 1:19 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] Amanda, BRU, or other tape backup
experience?
>
> I'm wondering if others have tried other tape backup products (other
tha
> -Original Message-
> From: Charlie Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 3:10 PM
> To: Bob Meyers
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] [BETA]
e-smith-rsback-0.4.2-1.noarch.rpm
> released!
>
>
> On Wed,
> -Original Message-
> From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 2:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] [BETA]
e-smith-rsback-0.4.2-1.noarch.rpm
> released!
>
>
> Bob Meyers <[EMAIL PROTE
> -Original Message-
> From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 1:46 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [e-smith-devinfo] [BETA]
e-smith-rsback-0.4.2-1.noarch.rpm
> released!
>
>
> Bob Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Looks good Darrell, you must never sleep. See suggestion/idea below.
> -Original Message-
> From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 12:03 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [e-smith-devinfo] [BETA] e-smith-rsback-0.4.2-1.noarch.rpm
> released!
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg J. Zartman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Friday, September 06, 2002 11:45 AM
>
> clip...
>
> If the objective was to eliminate traffic on this list, I believe
think
> you are nearly there.
>
Bravo, cheers and amen.
--
Please report bugs to [EMAI
> > Is there an option or config switch that will permit users to
> > remotely check email with IMP, but keep same read messages on
> > server for
>
> Sure, it's called "not deleting the messages while in IMP".
Might
> want to suggest that users use IMAP instead of POP in the office;
> that
In SME 5.5, and soon 5.6:
Is there an option or config switch that will permit users to remotely
check email with IMP, but keep same read messages on server for
retrieving in the office via POP?
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security
Is it possible to direct a Virtual domain web to a server inside the
private network, other than forwarding the port?
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only) to discuss security issues
Support for registered customers and partners to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To
It looks like I also jumped the gun. After trying it again, the
port-forward module IS working on 5.5 OK. I am just quick-triggered
today, too much coffee, not enough sleep :)
Sorry.
> -Original Message-
> From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, July 18, 2002 12:36
Port-forwarding is one big omission from an otherwise great product,
IMHO. I have used some sort of pf at all my customers. Even your panel
lacks the important element of granting forwards to only certain
IP's/Domains.
I used to set up home-grown ipchains firewalls with the help of
pmfirewall. I
I don't think it does work Darrel, have you or anyone else tried it? I
just upgraded my in-house server last night. The Port Forward panel is
still there, and the entries, but they don't seem to function. I
determined that by a:
ipchains -L
I even went into the panel, removed them and re-enter
> -Original Message-
> From: Graeme Robinson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 17, 2002 7:24 PM
> To: Brad Hards
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; devinfo
> Subject: Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Exchange replacements
>
> http://www.prochange.org/www/
>
> this looks promising.
> future
Yeah Darrell, but can one get the anti-spam unbundled? Without the RAV
virus?
I am always interested in anti-spam approaches, for customers who run a
paid-subscription SME, with Mitel virus protection.
Bob Meyers
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (only
I have installed ezmlm, and completed a crude test list. Now that I am ready
to implement a real list, I am having trouble locating doc on ezmlm. The
primary site I found, ezmlm.area.com, is full of broken links in the docs.
Does anyone have some good ezmlm doc links?
What I was specifically loo
> -Original Message-
> From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:36 AM
> Jeff Coleman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> > BackupEdge has some very nice features but suggested retail is $300.
>
>
> Arkeia does not include the robust disaster recovery tools
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Coleman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
>
> BackupEdge has some very nice features but suggested retail is $300.
> While I agree that this is not out of range for a commercial product, it
> seems unnecessary.
>
I buy Edge wholesale. I wasn't even aware wha
> -Original Message-
> From: Darrell May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 6:07 PM
> To: Bob Meyers; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: BackupEDGE [was Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Anti-virus and backup
> programs (newbie)]
>
>
>
> Bob Meyers <
> From: Brandon Friedman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 27, 2002 1:02 PM
>
> Hi Bob
>
> Welcome aboard...
Thanks!
>
> I test a large number of backup software for Linux both open and close
> source. I think it comes down to personal choice... as with most
> things. I choos
Pardon me, I am a newbie, I have been lurking here for a while, observing. I
have noticed a recent panic over taper not working over 4GB.
I have been doing Unix (mostly SCO-Caldera) for over 20 years, only recently
took up SME. If you guys have stuff that is really mission-critical on SME,
for ba
23 matches
Mail list logo
