Quoting Mike Sensney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Sigh. If you really want to think so then so be it. This is a developer's
> list.
> It is for people who actually write code to discuss problems they are
> having and
> to discuss what they are considering. Others who are not developers should
> stay
See previous posting
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Noah Genner wrote:
> > Dan stop taking the steroids
>
> This is getting ridiculous!
>
>
> --
> Noah Genner
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.genner.on.ca/noahville/
>
>
--
Please report bugs to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please mail [EMAIL PROTECTED] (on
I apologised to Dan offlist. I had a polite PRIVATE discussion with Greg,
and Dan chose to post back to the list. I dislike being slapped down to
size as I don't need it. I have apologised off list to Dan and I am
following that through here.
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Greg Zartman wrote:
> >>Dan
> As Gordon requested, please provide specifics to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> If this statement was a mistake (i.e. you were thinking of some other
> project)
> and there are no such cases to be found, I would ask that a statement
> to that effect be posted to this list.
Dan stop taking the steroids
Cheers Charlie I did use groups.google for 35 mins and came up with
absolutely nothing :)
On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Charlie Brady wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Dick Morrell wrote:
>
> > I'd love to have OpenH323 as a core package on GPL releases of SME. It's
> >
For the last few years I've used OpenH323 on VPN'd connections between
sites, with IP Phones and users with Gnomemeeting and OhPhone. I've always
set up gatekeepers up on "internal" machines with Procomm VoIP phones
looking to that as its gatekeeper.
I'd love to have OpenH323 as a core package
>
> Guys, I have seen enough of this to last a lifetime from this reflector.
> Please refrain from putting others down. There is *NO* need to say things
> like "...you havent the skills nor the time, nor the awareness of whats
> needed..." (sic) , even if you are convinced you are right. It is
(apologies for top posting)
There is absolutely NOTHING wrong with the base we have at all. Remember
Linux is Linux forget the RedHat issues its a non starter - just think
like engineers.
For those that want to realise why this isnt a major issue let me explain.
Four years ago at VA Linux wh
It is based on RH7.3 with proprietary and GPL Perl mods. I say proprietary
as there are more than a few GPL "vagries".
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003, Greg Zartman wrote:
> My subject asks the question. I was under the impression that SME 6 was
> based on RH8, but the kernel looks like it comes from RH
> No flames intended... I will say that I have alot of personal interest
> in this community as I've been involved with it for several years. I
> like SME and I like working with these people.
Cool I've been using it as long as you and I knew the likes of Dan York
way way way E-Smith even exis
>
> Thanks what I understand. We all may not have 19 GPL projects under our
> belts, but I think most would be impressed with the collective resumes
> of those working on the project over at contribs.org. We can go back
> and forth all day about this kind of stuff, yet it gets us no-where.
>
Quoting Greg Zartman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > silly Question is anybody talking to http://free-eos.org/ about joining
> > efforts?
>
> Charlie pointed these guys out last week. The biggest issue I see is
> the language barrier. ;o)
>
> Greg
This really is a non issue. I have 21 translators
12 matches
Mail list logo
