Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Beta4 named service

2001-04-26 Thread Charlie Brady
On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Michael Weinberger wrote: > I did a fresh install of the beta4, dedicated server with pppoe. > It looks like that the named service is not running at all. What makes you say that? > chkconfig reports named off for all levels, chkconfig has nothing (or next to nothing) to

Re: [e-smith-devinfo] Beta4 named service

2001-04-26 Thread Michael Weinberger
Charlie, I repent in sackcloth and ashes ... :-< DNS works perfectly! I stumbled over a misconfigured default route. When testing the connection I have pinged an IP number and it works. Should I have tried my assigned local IP? Obviously I did - embarrassing! Reading the postings again with focu

Beta4 named service

2001-04-26 Thread Michael Weinberger
Hi, I did a fresh install of the beta4, dedicated server with pppoe. It looks like that the named service is not running at all. chkconfig reports named off for all levels, but there is a process "/usr/sbin/named -u dns --g dns -t /home/dns" running. service named status gives: ndc: error: ctl_c