Gordon Rowell said:
The issue is also not just with virtual domains. The server is designed
to host a single user community with a single set of user rights across
the services - web, Samba, AppleTalk, etc.
Which is perfect for the 'S'mall to 'M'edium 'E'nterprise :-)
rob
--
Hugues,
I have some comments on a few of your points from below.
--Noah Genner
So I've got a few suggestions.
#1- Messaging, I've lost three contract because e-smith can do share
calendering between outlook clients (replace exchange server)
Solution-- How about Kroupware +
Oppps..
This (there is no a RH rpm available) should have read = there is a RH rpm
available.
--Noah
Quoting Noah Genner [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hugues,
I have some comments on a few of your points from below.
--Noah Genner
So I've got a few suggestions.
#1- Messaging, I've lost
Noah Genner wrote:
Hugues,
I have some comments on a few of your points from below.
--Noah Genner
So I've got a few suggestions.
#1- Messaging, I've lost three contract because e-smith can do share
calendering between outlook clients (replace exchange server)
Solution-- How about
On 01/08/03 Hugues Belanger did say:
#2- Messaging, better support for multiple mail domains, separated name space
I.e [EMAIL PROTECTED] is not the same as [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Solution -- I'm not sure, but postfix or exim comes to mind
This is not a limitation of qmail, just a design
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 03:51:02PM -0400, Michael P. Soulier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
[...]
This is not a limitation of qmail, just a design decision in the way
we handle virtual domains. Changing this would require a great deal more
than just changing MTAs.
Changing the MTA is actually
