On Fri, 26 Jul 2002, Jay Oliveri wrote:
> On Friday 26 July 2002 18:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > maybe I am just to stupid, but the output of fcpputsite seems a
> > little weird to me. Does anybody know what this means, especially the
> > enourmous count for "days ahead".
On Friday 26 July 2002 18:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> maybe I am just to stupid, but the output of fcpputsite seems a
> little weird to me. Does anybody know what this means, especially the
> enourmous count for "days ahead". I am wondering if freenet will keep
> the keys _that_ l
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Friday 26 July 2002 18:38 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello,
>
> maybe I am just to stupid, but the output of fcpputsite seems a
> little weird to me. Does anybody know what this means, especially the
> enourmous count for "days ahead". I am won
On Fri, Jul 26, 2002 at 08:31:43PM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> With the current FCP implementation would be application writers have to
> handle metadata parsing for redirects themselves. This seems like an
> unreasonable burden, especially given that Oskar has already written a
> metadat
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 25 July 2002 12:56 pm, Ian Clarke wrote:
> Ok, so I try:
>
> [ian@dhcp-63-143 cachedot]$ fcpputsite -d -l 1 02/07/25/1454204
> /tmp/cachedot Jfwpce58XD6gk~uOz4zy2rzV65g
> ABCABCABCABCACBAXBCBABABABBA
>
> It beavers away for a while, then o
Ian Clark wrote:
> Frost seems to work fine without re-announcement.
>
> Ian.
Yes, it does seem to do so.
There are several reasons that I think make Frost work better than FMB
without re-announcements:
One: Possibly larger user base of Frost means the data is more popular,
and gets cached
Just wanted to check in and ask around to see if anybody is actually
doing anything with the watchme network. The data doesn't seem to be
getting collected, the scripts on hawk fail every once in a while and
we go days without actually collecting any data.
The watchme network doesn't seem to h
On Fri, 26 Jul 2002 20:31:43 -0400
Gianni Johansson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With the current FCP implementation would be application writers have
> to handle metadata parsing for redirects themselves. This seems like
> an unreasonable burden, especially given that Oskar has already
> writte
With the current FCP implementation would be application writers have to
handle metadata parsing for redirects themselves. This seems like an
unreasonable burden, especially given that Oskar has already written a
metadata handling system.
I propose that we add an optional MetadataHint message
Hello,
maybe I am just to stupid, but the output of fcpputsite seems a little
weird to me. Does anybody know what this means, especially the enourmous
count for "days ahead". I am wondering if freenet will keep the keys
_that_ long.
The keys are just used for testing, they are not related to any
Ian Clarke writes:
>
> --Izn7cH1Com+I3R9J
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 07:02:11PM -0400, Andrew Rodland wrote:
> > I don't think, healthy freenet or not, that FMB could do muc
Ian Clarke writes:
>
> --6TrnltStXW4iwmi0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 06:43:06PM -0400, Dan Merillat wrote:
> > Correct answer is to use the same primatives to digitally sign
12 matches
Mail list logo
