Tyler Riddle writes:
> Thank you so much Edgar =)
> [snip]
> > >
> > I don't know how the conversation got to the topic
> > of nodes guessing
> > other nodes' specialization. This started about
> > whether a node could
> > guess what other nodes believe its specialization
> > is.
>
> I took a
Tyler Riddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Thank you so much Edgar =)
> [snip]
> > >
> > I don't know how the conversation got to the topic
> > of nodes guessing
> > other nodes' specialization. This started about
> > whether a node could
> > guess what other nodes believe its specialization
> >
Tyler Riddle writes:
> [snip]
> > >
> > And I assert that any presumptions the node makes
> > about what other
> > nodes believe its specialization is are inherently
> > flawed.
> >
> [snip]
>
> I really appreciate the fact that you are taking some
> time to discuss this issue. I'm glad that a
Thank you so much Edgar =)
[snip]
> >
> I don't know how the conversation got to the topic
> of nodes guessing
> other nodes' specialization. This started about
> whether a node could
> guess what other nodes believe its specialization
> is.
I took a temporary steer in that direction to feel the
Thank you so much Edgar =)
[snip]
> >
> I don't know how the conversation got to the topic
> of nodes guessing
> other nodes' specialization. This started about
> whether a node could
> guess what other nodes believe its specialization
> is.
I took a temporary steer in that direction to feel the
Tyler Riddle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [snip]
> > >
> > And I assert that any presumptions the node makes
> > about what other
> > nodes believe its specialization is are inherently
> > flawed.
> >
> [snip]
>
> I really appreciate the fact that you are taking some
> time to discuss this iss
[snip]
> >
> And I assert that any presumptions the node makes
> about what other
> nodes believe its specialization is are inherently
> flawed.
>
[snip]
I really appreciate the fact that you are taking some
time to discuss this issue. I'm glad that atleast one
person with the knowledge required
[snip]
> >
> And I assert that any presumptions the node makes
> about what other
> nodes believe its specialization is are inherently
> flawed.
>
[snip]
I really appreciate the fact that you are taking some
time to discuss this issue. I'm glad that atleast one
person with the knowledge required
Jeff Teitel writes:
> Edgar Friendly wrote:
>
> > As for changing this to try to take into account what the node
> > percieves as its specialization, I will insist on the inherent
> > wrongness of any such procedure and leave it at that.
>
> I don't understand why this is inherently wrong. I
Jeff Teitel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Edgar Friendly wrote:
>
> > As for changing this to try to take into account what the node
> > percieves as its specialization, I will insist on the inherent
> > wrongness of any such procedure and leave it at that.
>
> I don't understand why this is i
On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 07:40:35PM -0500, The FLOG Index wrote:
> Oskar,
>
> I am sorry if anything in my previous set of emails had given you the
> impression that I was kidding, joking around or otherwise attempting to
> pull a practical joke over on the mailing list. Or perhaps when you said
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
