On Tue, Feb 18, 2003 at 10:54:38PM -0500, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On February 18, 2003 10:22 pm, David Roden wrote:
[freenet-CVS] freenet/src/freenet/client/http
SplitFileRequestServlet.java,1.29,1.30 From: David Roden
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Update of
On February 19, 2003 05:27 am, David 'Bombe' Roden wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ed Tomlinson meinte:
Something is _not_ right here. Now I get a blank screen with no updated
when freenet tries to get a splitfile... This is using mozilla 1.3b.
Think the goal is
New Windows webinstaller for Freenet has been uploaded. Until the mirrors
propagate you should get it directly from here:
http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-webinstall.exe
I urge everyone with access to a windows PC (or several) to please give it a
whirl. If you have a chance, try
Dave Hooper schrieb:
Oh, and one other goodie is that with the new webinstaller, the node is only
stopped so it can be restarted - the node still runs while it downloads the
latest freenet.jar, etc.
would it be possible to rename the old jar instead of overwring it? My
current updating is
... but some Internet users ask in the support-ML of
Freenet about ISP problems. It seems that these people
ask Google for Freenet and send an eMail to the first
address they get... :(
Should we clearly list known ISP's with the name
Freenet ? Perhaps with a link to their support-
site? (What if
Is anyone working on modifying NodeConfig.exe to take advantage of the
new IP address auto-detection? This is a big deal as I suspect many
nodes which could contribute to the network don't because their users
don't know how to find out what their IP address is.
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
would it be possible to rename the old jar instead of overwring it? My
current updating is
- stop node
- rename jar (with version number)
- run updater
- start node
renaming the old jar to freenet-old.jar would be useful (and overwriting
that one if it exists) - not only if someone wants
I occasionally get such emails, but I am not sure it is worth pandering
to people too careless to read the first sentence on our website.
Ian.
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 10:05:07PM +0100, Stef wrote:
... but some Internet users ask in the support-ML of
Freenet about ISP problems. It seems that
is any one else on windows 2000 seeing this? if this isn't just
something wonkey on my windows box then this should be a 0.5.1 blocker,
as it prevents people from updating their freenet.
Josh Steiner wrote:
gladly:
[Freenet Launcher]
# following the runtime binaries to be used for the Java
I've just had a play with the way freenet.exe starts/stops the java process
and, while I didn't find anything specific, or reproduce the problem, I've
built a copy of freenet.exe that favours executing java.exe instead of
javaw.exe and sending certain thread-messages to the java.exe main thread
http://www.beermex.com/@spc/freenet/custom/freenet.exe
When shutting down freenet, I get a message that asks me if I really
want to close that dos app with the x instead of closing it with its
own end command.
If I say yes, then it works. But that's annoying.
mihi, windows millenium edition
- it creates some ugly temporary files within c:\
- place them within the temporary installation dir
- clean them up! they are left behind...
Please let me know what operating system (and service pack) you're using,
and also: what are the names of the files. I haven't seen this problem at
http://www.beermex.com/@spc/freenet/custom/freenet.exe
When shutting down freenet, I get a message that asks me if I really
want to close that dos app with the x instead of closing it with its
own end command.
If I say yes, then it works. But that's annoying.
Jesus' suffering fuck,
But something different - I tried to install the freenet installer twice
into different directories (i.e. my first install was into the old
C:\Programme\Internet\Freenet 0.5, and i wanted to make a fresh install
to C:\Programme\Internet\Freenet_0.5 as well) and now it does some
strange things
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
After a web insert, there is a return to gateway link. How about an option in
the POST request that could change the title and destination url of that
link? It'd have to pass through the anonymity filter, of course.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 05:33:35PM -0600, Glenn Crocker wrote:
I posted some webinstaller feedback earlier, but wasn't subscribed to devl
at the time, so it's waiting for moderator approval. If moderator approval
is never going to happen, I'll re-post.
Moderator approval isn't going to happen,
Dave Hooper schrieb:
You've stumbled across an excellent test! This seems to be a fault of the
NSIS engine (or perhaps a misunderstanding on my part - though quite why
NSIS should think C:\ is a short-filename approximation to
C:\Programme\Internet\Freenet_0.5 is beyond me!).
Perhaps because
Errm, is it really necessary to use 8.3 paths anywhere in communication
between 32-bit programs. When the path to the .exe contains spaces, put
it into marks.
It's easier to convert a path to short filenames than it is to see if the
path contains any spaces or path components with longer than
Ian Clarke ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I am quite determined that the new site (at
http://freenetproject.org/tiki/) be made available at or before the
0.5.1 release. With this in mind, EVERYONE CHECK IT OUT, SIGN UP IF
NECESSARY (password serapis), AND MAKE IT GOOD!
The front page is not
Dave Hooper schrieb:
I could always wrap it in quotes, of
course, but from my experience with other installer-builders (most notably
Wise) converting to short filenames is the most bullet proof.
Erm, my experiences with WISE installer show me that taking a leaf out
of WISE's book (hope
on my new node:
Maximum memory the JVM will allocate 128 MiB
Memory currently allocated by the JVM 10.016 KiB
Memory in use 8.878.304 Bytes
Unused allocated memory 1.376.632 Bytes
Total size of the data store
Erm, my experiences with WISE installer show me that taking a leaf out
of WISE's book (hope that's correct English) seems to be a bad idea. But
telling them here is quite off-topic...
True, true...
when you click the config option, it starts java (to get default
config?) However, that's
I just tried the new webinstaller on my win2k system, installing on top of a
very (6 months) old unused installation. Everything went well, defaults all
worked. When Freenet started and the icon appeared in my task bar, I moused
over it and saw Freenet is Running. Double-clicked and got an
I played with the Webinstaller some more, trying to install to a new folder
(instead of on top of my old Freenet folder). Win2k, IE.
I clicked the http://freenetproject.org/snapshots/freenet-webinstall.exe
URL, and ran it directly from there (I did not save it to disk first, just
ran it from
After downloading a FEC Segment, I get this message:
FEC decoding missing data blocks... this can take a long time. Be patient.
It sure would be nice if this gave some indication of how far done (%,
ideally, but any semi-useful changing number would be encouraging) it is
each time the page is
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Wooledge
Sent: Thursday, 20 February 2003 11:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [freenet-dev] 0.5.1 - preparations
The front page is not editable, it seems. At least not by us
mortals. And
26 matches
Mail list logo
