* Node must know its own IP address somehow. (Doesn't always work.)
Greg's Proposal:
* New node asks two other nodes what its own IP address is.
Best idea IMHO. More than 2 actually.
I think my proposal from quite some time ago was for the node to ask
another node (possibly more
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 01:26 pm, Dave Hooper wrote:
So:
A-B what is my IP address
B-A it is aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd
A creates a long random number and makes it available at its FNP port as
something like 'entropy.txt'
A-C get the entropy.txt from aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd and send me the result
So:
A-B what is my IP address
B-A it is aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd
A creates a long random number and makes it available at its FNP port as
something like 'entropy.txt'
A-C get the entropy.txt from aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd and send me the result
C-aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd what is your entropy.txt?
aaa.bbb.ccc.ddd-C
How about this, which is simpler:
A-B what's my ip (same as above)
B-A a.b.c.d (same as above)
A-C connect to a.b.c.d and say 'foo'
C-a.b.c.d: foo
If A receives 'foo' from C, then a.b.c.d can be assumed to be valid.
True, that is simpler. I've just realised the flaw, however, that both
On Tuesday 03 June 2003 05:12 pm, Dave Hooper wrote:
True, that is simpler. I've just realised the flaw, however, that both
your and my schemes have: We never actually check that C is using a.b.c.d
to contact A. Which is, after all, the whole point.
For example, A-C connect to a.b.c.d and
The following message is appearing in my Recent Logs frequently:
FSDataStoreElement not closed in finalizer! - please report to [EMAIL PROTECTED] if
this happens frequently: freenet.node.ds.FSDataStoreElement:Key:
176d7ae35016d695df0b3d6f5ac315518326179f0a0302 Buffer: [EMAIL PROTECTED] New:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 04:24:35PM +0100, Toad wrote:
|| On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 11:45:02AM +0200, Frank v Waveren wrote:
|| Not all of them apparantly, 5.0.0.0/8 is marked IANA RESERVED.
|| We check for local and LAN-only addresses
This 'maximum allowed redundancy is 50%' error
occured when attempting to insert a splitfile. Also when downloading a splitfile
the 'maximum allowed redundancy is 50%' error occurs.
Jun 2, 2003 5:45:12 PM (freenet.ConnectionHandler,
Finalizer, ERROR): I ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wasn't
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 03:59:54PM +0300, Erno Kuusela wrote:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 04:24:35PM +0100, Toad wrote:
|| On Wed, May 28, 2003 at 11:45:02AM +0200, Frank v Waveren wrote:
|| Not all of them apparantly, 5.0.0.0/8 is
Toad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 01:58:58AM +0200, Mark Wielaard wrote:
You might want to try to configure kaffe with --enable-pure-java-math
that will give you another (the GNU Classpath) java.math.BigInteger
implementation (which doesn't use the native libgmp).
10 matches
Mail list logo
