On Friday 11 July 2003 02:57 pm, Toad wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:02:41AM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> > On Friday 11 July 2003 09:32 am, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> > > On Thursday 10 July 2003 10:34 am, Toad wrote:
> > > > Please try build 5008, it has significant changes in this area.
> > >
Downloading through the browser does not work, i.e. "Write directly to
disk rather than sending to browser" is disabled.
It always stops with the message "Download aborted. The client dropped
the connection, the Freenet request timed out, or it was manually cancelled."
after some time.
Writing d
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, Toad wrote:
> Is 256kbps uplink a lot more common than 128kbps?
I have DSL, I'm in the US, and I've got 256k.
-todd
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
On Fri, 11 Jul 2003 14:17:16 -0700 Toad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I think we should allow at least 50 retries,
Recently I had to retry 20 times to finally get the file, so that 20*10=200
retries were needed for the last block...
>because once the file has been successfully downloaded once
>it
Could you reduce the default VM size to 128M? It appears to be enough on
recent code, with fairly heavy use and some tweaked settings (more
threads, more connections - what was your loglevel?), according to
Iakin.
I am changing it in start-freenet.sh.
Thanks.
--
Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTE
I think we should allow at least 50 retries, because once the file has
been successfully downloaded once it should come through a lot faster
for everyone else. The opposing argument is that we need to avoid
overloading the network - but other clients will do it if it gets the
files faster anyway. W
Toad ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Is 256kbps uplink a lot more common than 128kbps? In my country (UK) the
> low end cable deals have 128kbps up, which would suggest a default bwlimit
> of 8kB/sec, however DSL is all 256kbps.
The majority of cable modem service in the USA is 128 kbps, from
what
With -Xmx128mb configured:
Connections open (Inbound/Outbound/Limit)719 (441/278/750)
Connections transferring (Receiving/Transmitting)127 (38/89)
Bytes waiting to be sent31 MiB
Maximum memory the JVM will allocate192 MiB
Memory currently allocated by the JVM130,112 KiB
Memory in use115,882,080
Is 256kbps uplink a lot more common than 128kbps? In my country (UK) the
low end cable deals have 128kbps up, which would suggest a default bwlimit
of 8kB/sec, however DSL is all 256kbps. Reports on the situation in the
US are varied... more information is required. The problem is that if
the bwli
We need to do something about bandwidth limits, or users will make their
nodes transient if they ever get some query load. How is this currently
handled in the Windows installer? We need it to ask the user what type
of connection it has:
* Modem - no limits, but set transient=true
* Broadband:
Uplo
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 11:02:41AM -0500, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> On Friday 11 July 2003 09:32 am, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> > On Thursday 10 July 2003 10:34 am, Toad wrote:
> > > Please try build 5008, it has significant changes in this area.
> >
> > No change.
>
> I tried switching to Blackdown. Tha
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:12:06PM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote:
> > Ok, I am getting "download of jre-win32-latest.exe failed" errors, if I
> > wasn't at the end of a slow modem I might try to fix it myself, but
> > since I am can someone look into it?
>
> Oh, shit. Looks like the symbolic link is p
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 01:12:06PM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote:
> > Ok, I am getting "download of jre-win32-latest.exe failed" errors, if I
> > wasn't at the end of a slow modem I might try to fix it myself, but
> > since I am can someone look into it?
>
> Oh, shit. Looks like the symbolic link is p
> ln jre-win32-latest.exe to
> point to j2re-1_4_1_03-windows-i586-i.exe
Erm, latest one for win is 1.4.2.
Or does that one have any problems w/ freenet?
Michael
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailm
On Friday 11 July 2003 09:07 am, Dave Hooper wrote:
> > There are the docs, and I'm actually as we speak in the process of making
> > an installer for an unstable version.
>
> That's a good idea, as in introduction to building installers, and useful
> in the short term as it provides an easy way fo
> Well, I know how the NSIS system works already, so that's a bonus. I'm
> just having a mite of trouble with the Modern UI code, be fixed in a
> jiffy.
How about letting us know what problems you're encountering trying to
build - that's one of the purposes of the mailing list (devl@) after all!
On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 10:25:58PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On a related note, it's very difficult to use firewall queueing
> facilities to manage Freenet bandwidth, because by its very design
> Freenet traffic tries to avoid being easily tagged. If anyone has
> any suggestions on how to tell
On Friday 11 July 2003 09:32 am, Tom Kaitchuck wrote:
> On Thursday 10 July 2003 10:34 am, Toad wrote:
> > Please try build 5008, it has significant changes in this area.
>
> No change.
I tried switching to Blackdown. That did result in less CPU form the VM, but
the "read selector loop" still gen
On Thursday 10 July 2003 10:34 am, Toad wrote:
> Please try build 5008, it has significant changes in this area.
No change.
___
devl mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hawk.freenetproject.org:8080/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
Well, I know how the NSIS system works already, so that's a bonus. I'm just having a mite of trouble with the Modern UI code, be fixed in a jiffy.
As for making the version selection available, yes, that would be extra infrastructure, but maybe not too much. Depends on how it's done. Yarr, this i
> There are the docs, and I'm actually as we speak in the process of making
> an installer for an unstable version.
That's a good idea, as in introduction to building installers, and useful
in the short term as it provides an easy way for Windows users to try out
unstable versions.
In the long te
Well, I'd do that, but I'd rather make sure I can still get a working build of of this thing. We'll know in about 20 minutes, though. After that, I'll agree.
Perhaps you should be coordinating with Dave to avoid duplicated effort?
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 08:37:35AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>There are the docs, and I'm actually as we speak in the process of
>making an installer for an unstable version.
--
Ian Clarke
There are the docs, and I'm actually as we speak in the process of making an installer for an unstable version.
> Done.
Thanks Ian.
> Perhaps if you provided a quick introduction to Windows installer
> hacking it would make it easier for someone to pick it up (ie. what
> files need changing, how do you build a new installer, useful reference
> urls etc).
>
> Ian.
Sure. Are there not "how to build" docs i
> Where are the scripts used to build the installer - are they in CVS?
Contrib/wininstall/ somewhere
The installer is called "freenet-modern.nsi", you'll need the *.ico files
too. It requires NSIS (free download from www.nullsoft.com), and also
required the native Win32 build of upx being in PATH
Yarr...Don't we need the installer script files so we can rebuild it? I thought we used the...nullsoft one. Right? Haven't used that in so long, but it's not hard to use.
> Oh, shit. Looks like the symbolic link is pointing to nowhere for some
> reason.
> Could someone with access to sftp go in to shell.sourceforge.net and cd to
> /home/groups/f/fr/freenet/htdocs/snapshots and ln jre-win32-latest.exe to
> point to j2re-1_4_1_03-windows-i586-i.exe
Done.
> ... Stil
This is what my traffic looks like, with two Freenet nodes and one
giFT daemon. All that incoming traffic is Freenet's. The outgoing
is a healthy mixture of both Freenet and giFT, and it totally
saturates my outbound bandwidth.
This is absolutely typical usage.
--
Greg Wooledge
> Ok, I am getting "download of jre-win32-latest.exe failed" errors, if I
> wasn't at the end of a slow modem I might try to fix it myself, but
> since I am can someone look into it?
Oh, shit. Looks like the symbolic link is pointing to nowhere for some
reason.
Could someone with access to sftp g
Hmm.. I added some code yesterday to catch this and have fred print a
better message instead of the stacktrace. The build you where using is
older that that I hope? If not then please tell me so I can repair
whatever it is that isn't working
/N
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTE
On Fri, Jul 11, 2003 at 12:58:37PM +0100, Dave Hooper wrote:
> That'll be me then
Where are the scripts used to build the installer - are they in CVS?
Using wine it may even be possible to automatically rebuild the
installer on hawk (which is running Linux).
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke
"Using this software may be illegal under some jurisdiction."
Should be "jurisdictions"
Ian.
--
Ian Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/
Founder, Locutus
That'll be me then
Your commentary pretty much agrees what I said in this morning's email...
java detection in the installer is rubbish and has been for a very, very
long time. The fix is to have the wininstaller only look for 1.4(.x)
keys, which I can do as soon as I have access (tomorrow mornin
Ok, I am getting "download of jre-win32-latest.exe failed" errors, if I
wasn't at the end of a slow modem I might try to fix it myself, but
since I am can someone look into it?
Also, the modal dialogs which ask about whether to download seednodes
among other things should really be replaced by r
I just tried to install Freenet on Windows and got the following error
in the Logfile:
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
java/nio/channels/spi/AbstractInterruptibleChannel
at freenet.node.Node.init(Node.java:1801)
at freenet.node.Main.main(Main.java:314)
Turns out that the comput
>A possibility would be for the rabbit icon to have 3 settings:
>* Disable throttling, use all available bandwidth
>* The default, throttle to half link speed
>* Throttle to one quarter of link speed
>Thoughts?
This seems the sanest way to go, at least for windows users, which it
sounds like we're
37 matches
Mail list logo
