Well, obviously the context isn't ideal, but its really is a solid
benefit to the fundamental architecture of Freenet, and probably one
we don't really highlight enough.
I sometimes get the sense that there is an anti-Freenet snobbery among
some of the more "academic" onion routing based tools,
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 4:50 AM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Wednesday 30 April 2008 19:34, Matthew Toseland wrote:
> > On Saturday 26 April 2008 04:57, j16sdiz at freenetproject.org wrote:
> > > Author: j16sdiz
> > > Date: 2008-04-26 03:57:34 + (Sat, 26 Apr 2008)
> > > New Revision:
Re: bad PR for freenet on Slashdot
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date:
Friday 02 May 2008 01:04:54
Groups:
freenet
Followup-To:
freenet
References: 1 2 3
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At Sat, 26 Apr 2008 20:51:38 + starobrno wrote:
Why is this bad PR? If all pedos suddenly left Freenet i
Well, obviously the context isn't ideal, but its really is a solid
benefit to the fundamental architecture of Freenet, and probably one
we don't really highlight enough.
I sometimes get the sense that there is an anti-Freenet snobbery among
some of the more academic onion routing based tools,
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-01 13:47:49]:
Author: toad
Date: 2008-05-01 13:47:49 + (Thu, 01 May 2008)
New Revision: 19643
Added:
trunk/apps/new_installer/res/unix/bin/install_autostart.sh
Modified:
trunk/apps/new_installer/ProcessPanel.Spec.xml
