[freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

2008-05-21 Thread Florent Daignière
g that ubuntu is bundling alpha versions of FF). -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080521/0c8702da/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] [freenet-chat] Why is freenet so difficult?

2008-05-21 Thread Matthew Toseland
websites) and a couple of bundled applications (for filesharing and uploading freesites). -- next part -- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080521/ee880a29/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

2008-05-21 Thread Matthew Toseland
tion/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080521/2f92f8c7/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

2008-05-21 Thread Florent Daignière
freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080521/b9fc21d3/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] More on Perst was Re: New database for Freenet: db4o

2008-05-21 Thread Matthew Toseland
ame: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080521/9c76efa2/attachment.pgp>

[freenet-dev] db4o and clients was More on Perst was Re: New database for Freenet: db4o

2008-05-21 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 10:42 PM, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On Tuesday 20 May 2008 15:21, Ian Clarke wrote: >> On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:42 AM, Matthew Toseland >> wrote: >> > Another worry with db4o: a lot of configuration needs to be done on the > Db4o >> > object, before creating the

Re: [freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

2008-05-21 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 06:42, Florent Daignière wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 21:58:02]: GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support for all the new 1.5 language features. IMHO this means that there is no longer any reason

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-chat] Why is freenet so difficult?

2008-05-21 Thread Matthew Toseland
On Wednesday 21 May 2008 02:23, William J Brown wrote: I've been trying to use freenet for a week. I can't send mail or post a msg using FMS. Freenet is going nowhere without without some easy way to get help. I set up Outlook's news server for local host 1119, and i get

Re: [freenet-dev] Moving to java 1.5

2008-05-21 Thread Florent Daignière
* Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-21 11:46:57]: On Wednesday 21 May 2008 06:42, Florent Daignière wrote: * Matthew Toseland [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-05-17 21:58:02]: GCC 4.3 shipped in March, including the new ECJ frontend. It has full support for all the new 1.5

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19969 - branches/db4o/freenet/src/freenet/node

2008-05-21 Thread Daniel Cheng
Why not just use the darknet port number? I think each node have a different darknet port number even when they are in the same VM On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 11:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: toad Date: 2008-05-20 15:32:20 + (Tue, 20 May 2008) New Revision: 19969 Added:

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r19992 - branches/db4o/freenet/src/freenet/client/async

2008-05-21 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 7:10 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: toad Date: 2008-05-20 23:10:04 + (Tue, 20 May 2008) New Revision: 19992 Modified: branches/db4o/freenet/src/freenet/client/async/ClientRequestScheduler.java Log: Ask both the transient and non-transient scheduler, or

Re: [freenet-dev] [freenet-cvs] r20017 - branches/db4o/freenet/src/freenet/client/async

2008-05-21 Thread Daniel Cheng
On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 9:54 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: toad Date: 2008-05-21 13:54:05 + (Wed, 21 May 2008) New Revision: 20017 Modified: branches/db4o/freenet/src/freenet/client/async/ClientRequestSchedulerBase.java