On Tuesday 20 May 2008 21:19, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Matthew Toseland > <toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > > On Tuesday 20 May 2008 20:46, bbackde at googlemail.com wrote: > >> Uh? You have to mark in-memory objects as unused to get rid of them? > > > > No, on-disk ones. Because db4o is query-oriented, it doesn't know what objects > > you want and what you don't. > > I think this is probably an apples and oranges comparison. In Perst > you store things in collections, unless I'm missing something those > things still have to be deleted from those collections or Perst will > retain them.
Or you refer to them from another object. Or you refer to them from the root object. But clearly it's a result of different design philosophies. > > Ian. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20080521/9c76efa2/attachment.pgp>
