Evan Daniel skrev:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
>>> I see 4 basic options. First, we could wait for GWT to support XHTML.
>> Not a good option IMHO, although timing and priorities re merging and
>> enabling web-pushing are debatable...
>
> I assume Google hasn't
xy should never turn a standards-compliant
> page into one that isn't. (It might still change it, as there's
> plenty of standards-compliant stuff that's not safe from a Freenet
> perspective.)
>
> Evan Daniel
-- next part --
A non-text attachm
t;
> Thoughts welcome
>
> sashee
-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20091124/6d5a5b7b/attachment.pgp>
If anyone is still having trouble with git, I suggest watching this
tutorial:
http://excess.org/article/2008/07/ogre-git-tutorial/
You only need to watch the first 40 minutes or so, where it explains all
the basic concepts of git, and its "theoretical model" of commits and how
they link up to
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Christian Funder Sommerlund (Zero3)
wrote:
> Evan Daniel skrev:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
I see 4 basic options. ?First, we could wait for GWT to support XHTML.
>>> Not a good option IMHO, although timing and priorities re
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Sunday 22 November 2009 17:21:11 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:51 AM, sashee wrote:
>>
>> > The XHTML support is still broke, and most likely will be in the
>> > future, as folks at GWT thinks it is low priority (
>>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Christian Funder Sommerlund (Zero3)
wrote:
> Evan Daniel skrev:
>> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Matthew Toseland
>> wrote:
I see 4 basic options. First, we could wait for GWT to support XHTML.
>>> Not a good option IMHO, although timing and priorities re
Evan Daniel skrev:
> On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Matthew Toseland
> wrote:
>>> I see 4 basic options. First, we could wait for GWT to support XHTML.
>> Not a good option IMHO, although timing and priorities re merging and
>> enabling web-pushing are debatable...
>
> I assume Google hasn't
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 2:32 PM, Matthew Toseland
wrote:
> On Sunday 22 November 2009 17:21:11 Evan Daniel wrote:
>> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:51 AM, sashee wrote:
>>
>> > The XHTML support is still broke, and most likely will be in the
>> > future, as folks at GWT thinks it is low priority (
>>
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:35 AM, X. Luo wrote:
> If anyone is still having trouble with git, I suggest watching this
> tutorial:
>
> http://excess.org/article/2008/07/ogre-git-tutorial/
>
> You only need to watch the first 40 minutes or so, where it explains all
> the basic concepts of git, and i
On Sunday 22 November 2009 17:21:11 Evan Daniel wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2009 at 11:51 AM, sashee wrote:
>
> > The XHTML support is still broke, and most likely will be in the
> > future, as folks at GWT thinks it is low priority (
> > http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=
On Sunday 22 November 2009 16:51:10 sashee wrote:
> Hello folks
>
> I've been busy with my final thesis as you've probably noticed and
> couldn't make progress to fix and stabilize the web-pushing
> functionality. The #1 problem with it is that it has became a
> maintenance nightmare to keep the b
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 11:35 AM, X. Luo wrote:
> If anyone is still having trouble with git, I suggest watching this
> tutorial:
>
> http://excess.org/article/2008/07/ogre-git-tutorial/
>
> You only need to watch the first 40 minutes or so, where it explains all
> the basic concepts of git, and i
If anyone is still having trouble with git, I suggest watching this
tutorial:
http://excess.org/article/2008/07/ogre-git-tutorial/
You only need to watch the first 40 minutes or so, where it explains all
the basic concepts of git, and its "theoretical model" of commits and how
they link up to
14 matches
Mail list logo
