Re: [freenet-dev] use continuos integration system in Freenet

2012-12-28 Thread Steve Dougherty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/24/2012 12:26 PM, Simon Vocella wrote: Hi All, I see that Freenet don't use a continuos integration system (ci), for who don't know what's a ci, it permits an automatic build and notification after every push (for git) or commit (for

Re: [freenet-dev] use continuos integration system in Freenet

2012-12-28 Thread Steve Dougherty
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/24/2012 12:26 PM, Simon Vocella wrote: Hi All, I see that Freenet don't use a continuos integration system (ci), for who don't know what's a ci, it permits an automatic build and notification after every push (for git) or commit (for

Re: [freenet-dev] FMS: Surrounded nodes and opennet was Re: Really secure inserts?

2012-12-28 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Dienstag, 25. Dezember 2012, 07:49:51 schrieb Fabio Gonzalez: Darn, 10.000€ is just what the BKA (german central police) spends yearly to surveill skype… So they could easily afford making every second freenet node a police-node. If each node to ask others give the plain text,

Re: [freenet-dev] FMS: Surrounded nodes and opennet was Re: Really secure inserts?

2012-12-28 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Montag, 24. Dezember 2012, 21:11:55 schrieb Robert Hailey: With that being said, the scarce resource (in theory) would be location (detectable by network address), because an attacker simulating many nodes would likely have them in a very confined space (like a server closet or a few

Re: [freenet-dev] Depth-first announcement

2012-12-28 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Mittwoch, 21. November 2012, 19:22:25 schrieb Juiceman: This would be an automated system that wouldn't require users emailing someone to add them to the list. Do you know the Gnutella UDP Hostcaches? They are a distributed but serverbased system for getting first connections. One example:

Re: [freenet-dev] Fwd: DNS block

2012-12-28 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
Am Donnerstag, 27. Dezember 2012, 16:52:18 schrieb Ian Clarke: Had this conversation with a provider of wifi-hotspots in Austin. I had initially sent an email complaining that http://freenetproject.org/ was blocked in a coffee shop I frequent. Thank you for forwarding! I passed the URL to

Re: [freenet-dev] Fwd: DNS block

2012-12-28 Thread Ian Clarke
Yeah, he is now claiming it's to prevent copyright infringement, and that I need to contact OpenDNS to get removed from the anonymizers list. But Freenet *is* an anonymizer, so I'm not sure how that argument is supposed to go. Could you ask your journalist friend to contact me before writing

Re: [freenet-dev] Fwd: DNS block

2012-12-28 Thread Arne Babenhauserheide
I pointed him to your new message. Hi might still overlook the message (it’s on identi.ca and twitter, not via email), but let’s hope he sees it. Best wishes, Arne Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2012, 08:50:51 schrieb Ian Clarke: Yeah, he is now claiming it's to prevent copyright infringement, and

Re: [freenet-dev] coding in Freenet

2012-12-28 Thread Juiceman
On Nov 23, 2012 4:09 PM, Matthew Toseland t...@amphibian.dyndns.org wrote: On Friday 23 Nov 2012 20:47:24 Simon Vocella wrote: Hi all, i have more questions after one my little refactoring: - Why you don't user a log4j or similar project to log? There's a lot we could move to third

Re: [freenet-dev] Fwd: DNS block

2012-12-28 Thread Ian Clarke
FYI - they have whitelisted FreenetProject.org - so it's all good. Please let your journalist friend know. Ian. On Fri, Dec 28, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Arne Babenhauserheide arne_...@web.dewrote: I pointed him to your new message. Hi might still overlook the message (it’s on identi.ca and twitter,